Randwick Local Planning Panel
Meeting
Thursday 9 July 2020
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
Randwick Local Planning Panel meeting
![]() |
Notice is hereby given that a Randwick Local Planning Panel meeting
will be held by public teleconferencing via Microsoft Teams on
Thursday, 9 July 2020 at 1pm
Declarations of Pecuniary and Non-Pecuniary Interests
Address of RLPP by Councillors and members of the public
Privacy warning;
In respect to Privacy & Personal Information Protection Act, members of the public are advised that the proceedings of this meeting will be recorded.
Urgent Business
General Reports
GR3/20 Delegations of RLPP functions to General Manager...................................................... 1
Development Application Reports
D34/20 18 Jenner Street, Little Bay (DA/598/2019)................................................................. 13
D35/20 36 The Avenue, Randwick (DA/653/2019).................................................................. 43
D36/20 305 & 307 Anzac Parade, Kingsford (DA/571/2019).................................................... 85
D37/20 8 Day Avenue, Kensington (DA/106/2020)................................................................ 113
Kerry Kyriacou
Director City Planning
Randwick Local Planning Panel meeting
General Report No. GR3/20
|
Subject: Delegations of RLPP functions to General Manager |
Executive Summary
· The primary function of the Randwick Local Planning Panel (RLPP) is to determine developments with a high corruption risk, sensitivity or strategic importance. Whilst the current triggers for referral effectively capture these development types, they also capture some minor developments that do not warrant referral.
· Referral of minor and straightforward applications is of minimal community benefit and results in poor utilisation of resources. Therefore, referrals should only be made when increased transparency and accountability is required in order to achieve greater efficiency in the assessment process.
· Section 2.20(8) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, outlines that a Local Planning Panel may delegate any function of the Panel (other than the power of delegation) to the General Manager or other staff of the Council.
· A detailed review of the triggers for referral has been undertaken to identify the minor application types that do not appear to warrant referral. This report considers these ‘unnecessary’ referrals and recommends that determination of certain matters be delegated back to Council staff by the RLPP.
That the Randwick Local Planning Panel (RLPP) delegate determination of the following applications to the General Manager, pursuant to Section 2.20(8) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979:
a. Development Applications for footway trading activities, if the only reason for referral to the RLPP is that the landowner is Council; and
b. Modification applications made under Section 4.55 (1) and Section 4.55(1A) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 where there is a potential for conflict of interest.
|
1.⇩ |
Local Planning Panels Direction - Development Applications - 2018-02-23 |
|
Purpose
Local Planning Panels were established to enhance the integrity of the assessment process, particularly for controversial applications of the types identified in the Local Planning Panels Direction (Attachment 1). Broadly, such applications can be regarded as those that are contentious, sensitive or involving a conflict of interest. However; certain minor development applications have also been captured by the referral triggers.
Referral to the RLPP involves additional time and cost. Therefore, referrals should only be made when increased transparency and accountability is required. Referral of minor/straightforward applications is of minimal community benefit and results in poor utilisation of resources.
A detailed review of the triggers for referral has been undertaken to identify the minor application types that do not appear to warrant referral. This report considers these ‘unnecessary’ referrals and recommends that determination of certain matters be delegated back to Council staff by the Panel.
Background
On 10 August 2017, the Environmental Planning and Assessment and Electoral Legislation Amendment (Planning Panels and Enforcement) Bill was passed. As a result, all Councils in Greater Sydney and Wollongong were required to establish a Local Planning Panel.
The Minister for Planning issued a direction pursuant to Section 9.1 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 on 23 February 2018 (the Ministerial Direction), prescribing that various development applications are to be determined by Local Planning Panels on behalf of Councils (Attachment 1). The ministerial direction also required each Council to determine their own referral criteria for modification applications.
The following criteria have been adopted for referral of modification applications to the RLPP:
1. Modifications made under Section 4.55(2) of the Act where the Randwick Local Planning Panel made a determination on the original application;
2. Modifications made under Section 4.56 of the Act where the original application was determined by the Randwick Local Planning Panel before being granted consent by the Land & Environment Court and the modifications are not of minimal environmental impact;
3. All modification applications where the applicant or landowner is:
· the Council,
· a Councillor,
· a member of Council staff who is principally involved in the exercise of Council's functions under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979,
· a member of Parliament, or
· a relative (within the meaning of the Local Government Act 1993) of a person referred to in (b) to (d).
But not when the development is for the following purposes:
· internal alterations and additions to any building that is not a heritage item,
· advertising signage,
· maintenance and restoration of a heritage item, or
· minor building structures projecting from the building facade over public land (such as awnings, verandas, bay windows, flagpoles, pipes and services, and sun shading devices).
4. Modification applications where there are 10 or more unique submissions by way of objection.
Discussion
Whilst the current triggers for referral effectively capture most controversial development types, they also capture some minor developments that do not warrant referral.
Section 2.20(8) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, outlines that a Local Planning Panel may delegate any function of the Panel (other than the power of delegation) to the General Manager or other staff of the Council.
To date there have not been many applications referred to the RLPP for determination that would fit into the category of minor development. However, it is anticipated that due to recent COVID pandemic and Council’s commitment to assist local small businesses such as restaurants and cafes, there would be an increased in this type of development and it is important that we anticipate and plan to avoid unnecessary referrals in the future.
Below is a discussion of each of the triggers that appear to capture some minor developments that do not warrant referral.
1. Conflict of Interest: Development where Council is the landowner
Under the ministerial direction, development for which Council is the applicant or landowner must be determined by the RLPP. The only exceptions are:
· internal alterations and additions to any building that is not a heritage item,
· advertising signage,
· maintenance and restoration of a heritage item, or
· minor building structures projecting from the building facade over public land (such as awnings, verandas, bay windows, flagpoles, pipes and services, and sun shading devices).
Whist this referral criteria is broadly appropriate, it still captures footway trading applications which do not generally warrant referral to the RLPP
1.1 Footway trading
In most cases, Council is the ‘landowner’ for footpaths. Therefore, any development application that seeks consent to use or make changes to an existing use on a footway will require referral to the RLPP for determination.
The most common footway trading activity is outdoor dining. Footway/outdoor dining areas can only be approved in conjunction with an approved food and drink premise and Council has clear requirements for how and where they can be approved. Council does not currently receive many Development Applications (DAs) for footway dining as most are exempt development and only need approval under the Roads Act. However, there have been recent changes to the development standards in the State Environmental Planning Policy (Exempt and Complying Development Codes) 2008, such that outdoor dining is now only exempt if it is:
(d) not under an awning, unless the awning complies with the requirements set out in BP1.1 and BP1.2 of Volume 1 of the Building Code of Australia.
This may mean that there will be more DAs for footway dining in the future.
The assessment process for footway trading activities is transparent and involves multiple officers. Further, the commercial arrangements for use of the footpath are managed by Council’s property section (not the development assessment team), so there is minimal potential for a conflict of interest due to Council being the landowner.
Finally, if a particular application is contentious (i.e. receives 10 or more unique submissions), it will still be captured for referral to the Panel under the contentious development criteria.
Therefore, it is recommended that the RLPP delegate determination of development applications for footway trading activities to the General Manager if the sole reason for referral to the Panel is that the landowner is Council.
2. Modification applications where there is a potential conflict of interest
Under Council’s referral criteria for modification applications, the panel is required to determine all modification applications where the applicant or landowner is:
· the Council,
· a Councillor,
· a member of Council staff who is principally involved in the exercise of Council's functions under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979,
· a member of Parliament, or
· a relative (within the meaning of the Local Government Act 1993) of a person referred to in (b) to (d).
But not when the development is for the following purposes:
· internal alterations and additions to any building that is not a heritage item,
· advertising signage,
· maintenance and restoration of a heritage item, or
· minor building structures projecting from the building facade over public land (such as awnings, verandas, bay windows, flagpoles, pipes and services, and sun shading devices).
Whist the above referral criteria is appropriate for Section 4.55(2) modification applications. Under the Act:
· a modification application made under Section 4.55 (1) is a modification involving minor error, misdescription or miscalculation; and
· a modification application made under Section 4.55 (1A) is a modification involving minimal environmental impact.
Therefore, these applications do not warrant referral to the RLPP as they must, by definition, be of minimal environmental impact (or simply be correcting an error) and is recommended that the RLPP delegate the determination of these type of modification applications to the General Manager.
Strategic alignment
The relationship with the City Plan is as follows:
Outcome/Direction |
Delivery Program actions |
Outcome |
4. Excellence in urban design and development. |
Direction |
4b. New and existing development is managed by a robust framework. |
Resourcing Strategy implications
Referral of applications to the RLPP involves considerable time and cost. Therefore, delegation of certain determination functions to Council staff will improve the efficiency of the Development Assessment team (by reducing the number of referrals), and prevent unnecessary costs being incurred.
It would also result in increased availability of resources to deal with larger and more complex applications for which the RLPP remains the determining authority
Policy and legislative requirements
Section 2.20(8) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, gives a Local Planning Panel the power to delegate any function of the Panel (other than the power of delegation) to the General Manager or other staff of the Council.
Conclusion
A review of the current criteria for referral to the RLPP revealed that there are some low impact applications that are captured by the criteria, even though they do not warrant referral. To optimise use of available resources, it is recommended that the RLPP delegate determination of low impact developments to the General Manager as detailed in the recommendation section of this report.
Responsible officer: Frank Ko, Manager Development Assessment
File Reference: F2018/00147
Randwick Local Planning Panel meeting
Development Application Report No. D34/20
|
Subject: 18 Jenner Street, Little Bay (DA/598/2019) |
|
|
|
|
Subject Site |
|
|
|
Submissions received
Ù North
|
|
Locality Plan |
1. Executive summary
The application is referred to the Randwick Local Planning Panel (RLPP) as:
· The development involves works to an existing heritage item.
The proposal seeks development consent for the installation of a swimming pool and landscaping.
The key issues associated with the proposal relate to the impact that the development may have upon the heritage significance of the site and the amenity of the adjoining properties.
The proposal is recommended for approval subject to non-standard conditions that relate to archaeological relics, site protection and aboriginal objects, and also a condition to require the swimming pool coping level to be reduced to maintain privacy into the adjoining properties.
2. Site Description and Locality
The subject site is an irregular shaped lot at the end of the Jenner Street with a frontage of 17.7m with side boundaries varying from 14.76m to that northern side and 39.25m at the southern side boudaries. The site has an area of 657m² and is relatively level. At present there is a one and two storey dwelling on the site. See extract of the site survey below.
The site is located within the Prince Henry Hospital Site heritage conservation area under Randwick Local Environmental Plan 2012. The site and a number of buildings on it are listed on the State Heritage Register for its Aboriginal, natural, landscape and built heritage values. The building is located within the Historic Precinct within the former Hospital site, which is also listed as a heritage item under Randwick LEP 2012.
The site has been the subject of a Conservation Management Plan (CMP), Archaeological Management Plan (AMP) and Heritage Impact Assessment carried out by Godden Mackay Logan (GML) in conjunction with the preparation of a Master Plan and Development Control Plan for residential use of the previous hospital site.
Photos of the rear yard of the site and the location of the proposed swimming pool, the location of the pool has been approximated on site as setout below.
3. Relevant history
Nos. 18 & 20 Jenner Street were formerly occupied by Artisans’ Cottage Nos. 8 and 9, constructed in 1888, to provide married staff residences. Artisans’ Cottages Nos. 4, 5, 6 and 7, comprising a further two semi-detached pairs remain at Nos. 22 - 24 and Nos. 26 - 28 Jenner Street.
DA/922/2004 was approved for demolition of Artisans’ Cottages 8 and 9, which were in very poor condition.
DA/94/2006 was approved for construction of 4 x new semi-detached two storey cottages and additions to and refurbishment of the existing four existing Artisans cottages.
4. Proposal
The proposal seeks development consent for the installation of a swimming pool within the rear yard of the site including paving to the pool surrounds, landscaping and perimeter screening landscaping to the rear boundary. The pool and paving are proposed to be up to 600mm above existing ground level so as to be at the same level as the existing paved and lawn area off the side of the dwelling.
Location of swimming pool
Sections of proposed swimming pool
5. Notification
The owners of adjoining and likely affected neighbouring properties were notified of the proposed development in accordance with the Randwick Comprehensive DCP 2013. The following submissions were received as a result of the notification process:
Issue |
Comment |
Prince Henry at Little Bay Community Association
-There is a lack of heritage information submitted with the application.
-There is a lack of structural information with the application and concerns regarding the stability of the nearby heritage wall in relation to the site works and additional loads imposed by the installation of the swimming pool.
-The applicant has not followed the correct process in seeking the consent of the Community Associate before the development application was lodged,
55 Gubbuteh Road Little Bay
-The application has not provided enough information to demonstrate that there will not be any impacts to the adjoining heritage wall in relation to structural impacts.
-There are concerns that adjoining heritage items may be damaged during building works.
-Any heritage office approval should be made available for viewing by interested parties.
-There are concerns in relation to landscaping proposed not being in keeping with the recommended indigenous species as detailed in the Prince Henry Design Guidelines.
-The prescribed process for Development Applications at the Prince Henry site has not been followed.
116/1 Pavilon Drive Little Bay
-Concerns in relation to visual and acoustic privacy because of the use and location of the swimming pool. The raised level of the swimming pool will result in overlooking into their property which may not be prevented by the nominated screening plants.
-There are concerns in relation to impacts to their property that may arise due the excavation for the swimming pool and additional loads imposed by the weight of the water.
-There are discrepancies on the plans in relation to the value of works, the pool volume, location of rain water tank and removal of trees.
-The Community Association of the Prince Henry Estate has not approved the application.
Owners Corporation of SP 81878, 1 Pavilion Drive Little Bay
-There are discrepancies on the plans in relation to the value of works, the pool volume, location of rain water tank and removal of trees.
-There are concerns in relation to impacts to their property that may arise due the excavation for the swimming pool and additional loads imposed by the weight of the water.
-The proposed pool fencing will be higher than the boundary fencing and will be visible from the street.
|
An expanded heritage statement has been provided and referred to the NSW Heritage Council.
Conditions of consent are included with respect to structural engineering details in relation to excavation to ensure the stability of the subject and adjoining sites and features, to be submitted with the Construction Certificate application.
This is not a relevant matter for consideration of this development application.
As noted above, conditions of consent are included with respect to structural engineering details in relation to excavation to ensure the stability of the subject and adjoining sites and features, to be submitted with the Construction Certificate application.
See comment above. A specific condition of approval is recommended to address this concern. This matter has also been addressed by condition and comment from the Heritage Council approval.
The referral advice and approval is included in this report as appendix 1. and is also a public document available upon request.
The Prince Henry DCP Design Guidelines in relation to landscaping does not specifically relate the landscaping to rear private open space that is not visible from the public domain. The type and nature of the landscaping proposed is low scale landscaping consistent with providing for soft landscaping within a private open space surrounding a swimming pool.
This development application has been lodged and assessed as required under the relevant provisions of the applicable and relevant planning provisions.
See Key Issues
Conditions of consent are included with respect to structural engineering details in relation to excavation to ensure the stability of the subject and adjoining sites and features, to be submitted with the Construction Certificate application.
The submitted statement of environmental effects has been amended to correct the capacity of the swimming pool to be consistent with that stated on the BASIX Certificate. No trees which are the subject of the Tree Preservation Order are affected by this proposal.
This is a separate issue that is not relevant to the assessment of this development application.
The submitted statement of environmental effects has been amended to correct the capacity of the swimming pool to be consistent with that stated on the BASIX Certificate. No trees which are the subject of the Tree Preservation Order are affected by this proposal.
Conditions of consent are included with respect to structural engineering details in relation to excavation to ensure the stability of the subject and adjoining sites and features, to be submitted with the Construction Certificate application.
A condition of consent has been included to lower the coping level of the swimming pool which will reduce the extent of the visible swimming pool fencing. |
6. Relevant Environment Planning Instruments
6.1. Randwick Local Environmental Plan 2012 (LEP)
The site is zoned R1 General Residential under Randwick Local Environmental Plan 2012 and the proposal is permissible with consent.
The proposal is consistent with the specific objectives of the zone in that the proposed activity and built form will provide for the housing needs of the community and will protect the amenity of residents.
The following development standards in the RLEP 2012 apply to the proposal:
6.1.1. Clause 5.10 - Heritage conservation
See discussion in Key Issues.
7. Development control plans and policies
7.1. Randwick Comprehensive DCP 2013
The DCP provisions are structured into two components: objectives and controls. The objectives provide the framework for assessment under each requirement and outline key outcomes that a development is expected to achieve. The controls contain both numerical standards and qualitative provisions. Any proposed variations from the controls may be considered only where the applicant successfully demonstrates that an alternative solution could result in a more desirable planning and urban design outcome.
The relevant provisions of the DCP are addressed in Appendix 3.
8. Environmental Assessment
The site has been inspected and the application has been assessed having regard to Section 4.15 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979, as amended.
Section 4.15 ‘Matters for Consideration’ |
Comments |
Section 4.15 (1)(a)(i) – Provisions of any environmental planning instrument |
See discussion in sections 6 & 7 and key issues below.
|
Section 4.15(1)(a)(ii) – Provisions of any draft environmental planning instrument |
Nil. |
Section 4.15(1)(a)(iii) – Provisions of any development control plan |
The proposal generally satisfies the objectives and controls of the Randwick Comprehensive DCP 2013. See table in Appendix 3 and the discussion in key issues below
|
Section 4.15(1)(a)(iiia) – Provisions of any Planning Agreement or draft Planning Agreement |
Not applicable. |
Section 4.15(1)(a)(iv) – Provisions of the regulations |
The relevant clauses of the Regulations have been satisfied. |
Section 4.15(1)(b) – The likely impacts of the development, including environmental impacts on the natural and built environment and social and economic impacts in the locality |
The environmental impacts of the proposed development on the natural and built environment have been addressed in this report.
The proposal will not result in detrimental social or economic impacts on the locality. |
Section 4.15(1)(c) – The suitability of the site for the development |
The site is located in close proximity to local services and public transport. The site has sufficient area to accommodate the proposed land use and associated structures. Therefore, the site is considered suitable for the proposed development. |
Section 4.15(1)(d) – Any submissions made in accordance with the EP&A Act or EP&A Regulation
|
The issues raised in the submissions have been addressed in this report. |
Section 4.15(1)(e) – The public interest |
The proposal promotes the objectives of the zone and will not result in any significant adverse environmental, social or economic impacts on the locality. Accordingly, the proposal is considered to be in the public interest. |
8.1. Discussion of key issues
Heritage
Clause 5.10(4) of the Randwick LEP 2012 requires Council to consider the effect of a proposed development on the heritage significance of the heritage item.
As the site is listed on the State Heritage Register, the proposal generally needs to be the subject of an Integrated Development Application. As the NSW Heritage Council is the consent authority for the application, Council cannot issue development approval until the Heritage Office has provided conditions of consent.
The NSW Heritage Council has granted approval to the development subject to the submitted plans and documentation and conditions that relate to the discovery of any unexpected archaeological relics, site protection and any aboriginal objects.
The letter of advice of approval of the NSW Heritage Council is included in appendix 1.
Privacy
Section 7 of the Randwick Development Control Plan – Low Density Residential details the objectives and controls in relation to Fencing and Ancillary Development, which includes swimming and spa pools.
The relevant objective in this section seeks to provide for ancillary development that enhances the liveability of dwellings and maintains reasonable levels of visual amenity, solar access and privacy for the neighbouring dwellings.
The proposal details the swimming pool at the rear being up to 600mm above the existing ground level. This will have an adverse impact upon the privacy of the adjoining properties at the rear as the coping at this level will enable viewing above the existing dividing fence. Raising that fence to provide for a screen is not appropriate as that would result in poor visual amenity to the properties at rear. A condition of consent is included to reduce the level of the swimming pool coping to a maximum of 100mm above the existing ground level, being RL39.10.
9. Conclusion
That the application to install a swimming pool and landscaping within the rear yard of the dwelling be approved (subject to conditions) for the following reasons:
· The proposal is consistent with the relevant objectives contained within the RLEP 2012 and the relevant requirements of the RDCP 2013
· The proposal is consistent with the specific objectives of the R1 zone in that development will provide for the housing needs of the community and protect the amenity of residents.
Appendix 1: Referrals
1. External referral comments:
1.1. Heritage Council of NSW
2. Internal referral comments:
2.1. Heritage planner
Background
The site is located within the Prince Henry Hospital Site heritage conservation area under Randwick Local Environmental Plan 2012. The site and a number of buildings on it are listed on the State Heritage Register for its Aboriginal, natural, landscape and built heritage values. The building is located within the Historic Precinct within the former Hospital site, which is also listed as a heritage item under Randwick LEP 2012.
The site has been the subject of a Conservation Management Plan (CMP), Archaeological Management Plan (AMP) and Heritage Impact Assessment carried out by Godden Mackay Logan (GML) in conjunction with the preparation of a Master Plan and Development Control Plan for residential use of the previous hospital site.
The Site
The site is located towards the north end of the development area, within the Historic Precinct as identified within the Prince Henry Site, Little Bay section of Randwick DCP 2013. The site is occupied a semi-detached dwelling, part of a pair comprising nos.18 and 20 Jenner Street. Nos.18 - 20 Jenner Street were formerly occupied by Artisans’ Cottage Nos.8 and 9, constructed in 1888, to provide married staff residences. Artisans’ Cottages Nos.4, 5, 6 and 7, comprising a further two semi-detached pairs remain at nos.22 - 24 and Nos.26 - 28 Jenner Street.
Heritage element |
Applies |
Built elements in the vicinity |
· Historic Precinct · Artisans’ Cottages 4, 5, 6 and 7 · Matron Dixon Nurses Home · Significant Road Alignment |
Landscape elements in the vicinity |
· Specimen of coast banksia · Specimen of New Zealand Christmas tree · Sandstone rock cutting · Sandstone outcrops |
Aboriginal archaeological zone |
Zone 2- High Sensitivity |
Aboriginal identified site |
No |
Historical archaeological zone |
Zone 7- former Prince Henry Hospital Complex |
Historical identified site |
No |
Little Bay Geological site |
No |
Remnant native vegetation in the vicinity |
No |
History
DA/922/2004 was approved for demolition of Artisans’ Cottages 8 and 9, which were in very poor condition.
DA/94/2006 was approved for construction of 4 new semi-detached two storey cottages and additions to and refurbishment of the existing four existing Artisans cottages.
Proposal
The current application proposes landscaping works within the rear garden area, including installation of a swimming pool.
Approvals
As the site is listed on the State Heritage Register, the proposal generally needs to be the subject of an Integrated Development Application. As the NSW Heritage Council is the consent authority for the application, Council cannot issue development approval until the Heritage Office has provided conditions of consent.
Submission
The application has been accompanied by a Statement of Environmental Effects which includes a section addressing the Heritage Conservation Area and Archaeological Sensitivity. The SEE considers that:
There is no proposed impact on cultural landscape features such as established heritage significant planting, remnant roadworks or rock cuttings or similar cultural features.
Proposed excavation shall be confined to a small area specific to the proposed pool. The contractors responsible for the excavation works shall be briefed by the pool builder to be aware of the cultural significance of the area. The builder shall be prepared to ‘stop work’ and notify Randwick Council should any indigenous or culturally significant artefacts or rock carvings be observed when preparing for & undertaking the excavation works.
Comments
In relation to Fences, the Prince Henry Site, Little Bay section of Randwick DCP 2013 includes a control that side boundary fences have a maximum height of 1.8m. The SEE notes that the rear of the pool on the northern side will finish approximately 500mm above the natural grade, and that boundary fencing will modified, as required, for safety. It is unclear whether the finished fencing height will be consistent with the DCP control.
Consistency of the proposal with LEP, CMP and AMP
Subject to consent conditions in relation to Aboriginal and Historical Archaeology, it is considered that the proposal will not result in any adverse impacts to identified built or landscape elements, or to the significance of the heritage conservation area, with no potential for the identification of unknown archaeological material. It is considered that the proposed dwelling is generally consistent with the CMP, the AMP, the Amended Master Plan (August 2003), the LEP and the DCP.
Recommendation
The following consent conditions should be included in any consent, in addition to any General terms of Approval issued by Heritage NSW:
Aboriginal Archaeology
· Should Aboriginal objects be found, the Department of Environment and Conservation (DEC) is to be informed (as required by the provisions of the NSW National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974). Subject to an assessment of the extent, integrity and significance of any exposed objects, applications under ether Section 87 or Section 90 of the National Parks and Wildlife Act may be required before works resumes.
· Prior to the commencement of the proposed works, all contractors and relevant personnel involved are to be made aware of the existence of Aboriginal archaeological remains at the Prince Henry site by way of an induction process and of the possibility that more as yet undiscovered Aboriginal cultural material may exist there.
· Site contractors are to be advised of their obligations under the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974 (NSW) and notification procedures in the event that any Aboriginal cultural material is disturbed or exposed during site works.
Historical Archaeology
· Prior to the commencement of any subsurface disturbance (excavation), all those involved are to be made aware of the potential for historical archaeological relics to survive within the area. This is to be done through a site induction, which also notifies all involved of their obligations under the Heritage Act 1977 (NSW).
· In the event that historical archaeological remains or deposits are exposed during the works, the excavation works shall cease immediately and an evaluation of their potential extent and significance should be undertaken and the Heritage Council of NSW be notified under the requirements of the Heritage Act.
Appendix 3: DCP Compliance Table
3.1 C1 Table: Low Density Residential
DCP Clause |
Controls |
Proposal |
Compliance |
|
Classification |
Zoning = R1 |
|
2.4 |
Landscaping and permeable surfaces |
||
|
i) 601 sqm or above = 35% ii) Deep soil minimum width 900mm. iii) Maximise permeable surfaces to front iv) Retain existing or replace mature native trees v) Minimum 1 canopy tree (8m mature). Smaller (4m mature) If site restrictions apply. vi) Locating paved areas, underground services away from root zones. |
Site = 656m² Proposed = 35% |
Yes |
2.5 |
Private open space (POS) |
||
|
Dwelling & Semi-Detached POS |
|
|
|
601 sqm or above = 8m x 8m |
Site = 656m² Proposed = No change to existing POS. |
Yes |
4 |
Building design |
||
4.5 |
Colours, Materials and Finishes |
||
|
i) Schedule of materials and finishes ii) Finishing is durable and non-reflective. iii) Minimise expanses of rendered masonry at street frontages (except due to heritage consideration) iv) Articulate and create visual interest by using combination of materials and finishes. v) Suitable for the local climatic to withstand natural weathering, ageing and deterioration. vi) recycled and re-use sandstone (See also section 8.3 foreshore area.) |
To be conditioned. |
|
4.6 |
Earthworks |
||
|
i) excavation and backfilling limited to 1m, unless gradient too steep ii) minimum 900mm side and rear setback iii) Step retaining walls iv) site conditions allow for side or rear setback less than 900mm (max 2.2m) v) sloping sites down to street level must minimise blank retaining walls (use combination of materials, and landscaping) vi) cut and fill for POS is terraced where site has significant slope: vii) adopt a split-level design viii) Minimise height and extent of any exposed under-croft areas. |
The extent of earthworks are not significant and do not exceed the DCP controls. |
Yes |
7 |
Fencing and Ancillary Development |
||
7.1 |
General - Fencing |
||
|
i) Use durable materials ii) sandstone not rendered or painted iii) don’t use steel post and chain wire, barbed wire or dangerous materials iv) Avoid expansive surfaces of blank rendered masonry to street |
Existing timber fencing. |
Yes |
7.3 |
Side and rear fencing |
||
|
i) 1800mm maximum height (from existing ground level). Sloping sites step fence down (max. 2.2m). ii) Fence may exceed max. if level difference between sites iii) Tapper down to front fence height once past the front façade alignment. iv) Both sides treated and finished. |
The only change nominated on plans to the existing side and rear fencing is any medication to comply with the relevant swimming pool fencing standards. |
Yes |
7.5 |
Swimming pools and Spas |
||
|
i) Locate behind the front building line ii) Minimise damage to existing tree root systems on subject site and adjoining. iii) Located to minimise noise impacts on the adjoining dwellings. iv) Pool and coping related to site topography (max 1m over lower side of site). v) 900mm minimum coping from rear and side boundaries. vi) Incorporate screen planting (min. 3m mature height unless view corridors affected) between setbacks. vii) Position decking to minimise privacy impacts. viii) Pool pump and filter contained in acoustic enclosure and away from the neighbouring dwellings. |
The proposed swimming pool is sited to the rear of the dwelling up to 1000mm from the side and 1270mm from the rear boundaries. A condition of consent is included with respect to the pool plant and equipment being housed within a sound attenuating enclosure.
See discussion in Key Issues in relation to privacy. |
Yes, subject to condition. |
3.2 Prince Henry site, Little Bay
This section of the DCP provides for a framework for the development of land at the Prince Henry Hospital Site at Little Bay and provides controls to guide the built form, environmental and amenity standards and requirements for appropriate heritage protection for the site.
The folllowing provisions of this section of the DCP apply.
Views and Vistas
The main principles in this section of the DCP seek to maintain and enhance key views and vistas throughout the site.
The proposal complies with the objectives of this part of the DCP in that the proposed swimming pool will not have any impact upon the existing views and vistas from and surrounding the subject site.
Heritage Context
The proposed swimming pool and landscaping will not impact upon or detract from the heritage significance of the locality including any identified heritage items.
Archaeological Context
The conditions of consent included as recommended by the Heritage Council of NSW and Council’s Heritage include requirements relating to identification and protection of general archaeology and Aboriginal cultural and archaeological items.
Landscaping and Private Open Space
The proposed new swimming pool and associated landscaping will maintain and maximize the use of the existing private open space to the rear of the dwelling and will not visually dominate the existing built and heritage items or obscure any key views in the immediate locality.
Visual Privacy
As noted above the Key Issues above it is recommended that the level of the pool coping be reduced to be no more than a maximum of 100mm above existing ground level to maintain visual privacy into the adjoining properties.
1.⇩ |
Development Consent Conditions 18 Jenner Street DA/598/2019 |
|
Responsible officer: Perry Head, Environmental Planning Officer
File Reference: DA/598/2019
Development Consent Conditions 18 Jenner Street DA/598/2019 |
Attachment 1 |
DA No: |
DA/598/2019 |
Property: |
18 Jenner Street Little Bay |
Proposal: |
Installation of in ground swimming pool |
Recommendation: |
Approval |
Development Consent Conditions
GENERAL CONDITIONS
The development must be carried out in accordance with the following conditions of consent.
These conditions have been applied to satisfy the relevant requirements of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979, Environmental Planning & Assessment Regulation 2000 and to provide reasonable levels of environmental amenity.
Approved Plans & Supporting Documentation
1. The development must be implemented substantially in accordance with the plans and supporting documentation listed below and endorsed with Council’s approved stamp, except where amended by Council in red and/or by other conditions of this consent:
Plan |
Drawn by |
Dated |
LPDA20-58/1 Rev C |
Conzept Landscape Architects |
26/09/19 |
LPDA20-58/2 Rev B |
Conzept Landscape Architects |
26/09/19 |
LPDA20-58/3 Rev B |
Conzept Landscape Architects |
26/09/19 |
LPDA20-58/4 Rev B |
Conzept Landscape Architects |
26/09/19 |
BASIX Certificate No. |
Dated |
A360699 |
10/10/2019 |
Amendment of Plans & Documentation
2. The approved plans and documents must be amended in accordance with the following requirements:
a) The finished levels of the swimming pool and coping shall be reduced so that the coping is at a maximum RL of 39.10.
Unexpected Historical Archaeological Relics
3. The applicant must ensure that if unexpected archaeological deposits or relics not identified and considered in the supporting documents for this approval are discovered work must cease in the affected area (s) and the Heritage Council of NSW must be notified. Additional assessment and approval may be required prior to works continuing in the affected area(s) based on the nature of the discovery.
Site Protection
4. Significant built and landscape elements are to be protected during site preparation and the works from potential damage. Protection systems must ensure significant fabric, including landscape elements is not damaged or removed.
5. A Temporary Protection Plan shall be submitted with the Section 60 Application for Heritage Council approval. The report shall indicate a detailed methodology to ensure that the significant brick masonry retaining wall and stairs, adjacent to the subject site are protected during the construction works.
Aboriginal Objects
6. Should any Aboriginal objects be uncovered by the work which is not covered by a valid Aboriginal Heritage Impact Permit, excavation or disturbance of the area is to stop immediately and Heritage NSW is to be informed in accordance with the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974 (as amended). Works affecting Aboriginal objects on the site must not continue until Heritage NSW has been informed and the appropriate approvals are in place. Aboriginal objects must be managed in accordance with the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974.
7. Prior to the commencement of the proposed works, all those involved are to be made aware of the existence of Aboriginal archaeological remains at the former Prince Henry Hospital Site by way of an induction process, as well as the possibility that undiscovered Aboriginal cultural material may exist in the area affected by the proposal.
8. Site contractors are to be instructed as to their obligations under the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974 and notification procedures in the event that any Aboriginal cultural material is disturbed or exposed during site works.
Compliance
9. If requested, the applicant and any nominated heritage consultant may be required to participate in audits of Heritage Council of NSW approvals to confirm compliance with conditions of consent.
Section 60 application
10. An application under section 60 of the Heritage Act 1977 must be submitted to, and approved by the Heritage Council of NSW (or delegate), prior to work commencing.
REQUIREMENTS BEFORE A CONSTRUCTION CERTIFICATE CAN BE ISSUED
The following conditions of consent must be complied with before a ‘Construction Certificate’ is issued by either Randwick City Council or an Accredited Certifier. All necessary information to demonstrate compliance with the following conditions of consent must be included in the documentation for the construction certificate.
These conditions have been applied to satisfy the relevant requirements of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979, Environmental Planning & Assessment Regulation 2000, Council’s development consent conditions and to achieve reasonable levels of environmental amenity.
Consent Requirements
11. The requirements and amendments detailed in the ‘General Conditions’ must be complied with and be included in the construction certificate plans and associated documentation.
External Colours, Materials & Finishes
12. The colours, materials and surface finishes to the development must be consistent with the relevant plans, documentation and colour schedules provided with the development application.
Compliance Fee
13. A development compliance and enforcement fee of $90 shall be paid to Council in accordance with Council’s adopted Fees & Charges Pricing Policy, prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate for development.
Long Service Levy Payments
14. The required Long Service Levy payment, under the Building and Construction Industry Long Service Payments Act 1986, must be forwarded to the Long Service Levy Corporation or the Council, in accordance with Section 6.8 of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979.
At the time of this development consent, Long Service Levy payment is applicable on building work having a value of $25,000 or more, at the rate of 0.35% of the cost of the works.
Sydney Water Requirements
15. All building, plumbing and drainage work must be carried out in accordance with the requirements of the Sydney Water Corporation.
The approved plans must be submitted to the Sydney Water Tap in™ online service, to determine whether the development will affect Sydney Water’s waste water and water mains, stormwater drains and/or easements, and if any further requirements need to be met.
The Sydney Water Tap in™ online service replaces the Quick Check Agents as of 30 November 2015
The Tap in™ service provides 24/7 access to a range of services, including:
· Building plan approvals
· Connection and disconnection approvals
· Diagrams
· Trade waste approvals
· Pressure information
· Water meter installations
· Pressure boosting and pump approvals
· Change to an existing service or asset, e.g. relocating or moving an asset.
Sydney Water’s Tap in™ in online service is available at:
The Principal Certifying Authority must ensure that the developer/owner has submitted the approved plans to Sydney Water Tap in online service.
REQUIREMENTS TO BE INCLUDED IN THE CONSTRUCTION CERTIFICATE
The requirements contained in the following conditions of consent must be complied with and details of compliance must be included in the construction certificate for the development.
These conditions have been applied to satisfy the relevant requirements of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979, Environmental Planning & Assessment Regulation 2000, Councils development consent conditions and to achieve reasonable levels of environmental amenity.
Compliance with the Building Code of Australia & Relevant Standards
16. In accordance with section 4.17 (11) of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979 and clause 98 of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Regulation 2000, it is a prescribed condition that all building work must be carried out in accordance with the provisions of the Building Code of Australia (BCA).
BASIX Requirements
17. In accordance with section 4.17 (11) of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979 and clause 97A of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Regulation 2000, the requirements and commitments contained in the relevant BASIX Certificate must be complied with.
The required commitments listed and identified in the BASIX Certificate must be included on the construction certificate plans, specifications and associated documentation, to the satisfaction of the Certifying Authority.
The design of the building must not be inconsistent with the development consent and any proposed variations to the building to achieve the BASIX commitments may necessitate a new development consent or amendment to the existing consent to be obtained, prior to a construction certificate being issued.
Site stability, Excavation and Construction work
18. A report must be obtained from a suitably qualified and experienced professional engineer, which includes the following details, to the satisfaction of the Certifying Authority for the development:-
a) Geotechnical details which confirm the suitability and stability of the site for the development and relevant design and construction requirements to be implemented to ensure the stability and adequacy of the development and adjacent land.
b) Details of the proposed methods of excavation and support for the adjoining land (including any public place) and buildings.
c) Details to demonstrate that the proposed methods of excavation, support and construction are suitable for the site and should not result in any damage to the adjoining premises, buildings or any public place, as a result of the works and any associated vibration.
d) The adjoining land and buildings located upon the adjoining land must be adequately supported at all times throughout demolition, excavation and building work, to the satisfaction of the Principal Certifying Authority.
e) Written approval must be obtained from the owners of the adjoining land to install any ground or rock anchors underneath the adjoining premises (including any public roadway or public place) and details must be provided to the Certifying Authority.
REQUIREMENTS PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORKS
The following conditions of consent must be complied with prior to the commencement of any works on the site. The necessary documentation and information must be provided to the Council or the ‘Principal Certifying Authority’, as applicable.
These conditions have been applied to satisfy the relevant requirements of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979, Environmental Planning & Assessment Regulation 2000 and to provide reasonable levels of public health, safety and environmental amenity.
Certification and Building Inspection Requirements
19. Prior to the commencement of any building works, the following requirements must be complied with:
a) a Construction Certificate must be obtained from the Council or an accredited certifier, in accordance with the provisions of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979.
A copy of the construction certificate, the approved development consent plans and consent conditions must be kept on the site at all times and be made available to the Council officers and all building contractors for assessment.
b) a Principal Certifying Authority (PCA) must be appointed to carry out the necessary building inspections and to issue an occupation certificate; and
c) a principal contractor must be appointed for the building work and the requirements of the Home Building Act 1989 must be satisfied accordingly; and
d) the principal contractor must be advised of the required critical stage inspections and other inspections to be carried out, as specified by the Principal Certifying Authority; and
e) at least two days notice must be given to the Council, in writing, prior to commencing any works.
Construction Site Management Plan
20. A Construction Site Management Plan must be developed and implemented prior to the commencement of any works. The construction site management plan must include the following measures, as applicable to the type of development:
· location and construction of protective site fencing / hoardings;
· location of site storage areas/sheds/equipment;
· location of building materials for construction;
· provisions for public safety;
· dust control measures;
· details of proposed sediment and erosion control measures;
· site access location and construction
· details of methods of disposal of demolition materials;
· protective measures for tree preservation;
· location and size of waste containers/bulk bins;
· provisions for temporary stormwater drainage;
· construction noise and vibration management;
· construction traffic management details;
· provisions for temporary sanitary facilities.
The site management measures must be implemented prior to the commencement of any site works and be maintained throughout the works, to the satisfaction of Council.
A copy of the Construction Site Management Plan must be provided to the Principal Certifying Authority and Council prior to commencing site works. A copy must also be maintained on site and be made available to Council officers upon request.
Dilapidation Reports
21. A dilapidation report must be obtained from a Professional Engineer, Building Surveyor or other suitably qualified independent person, in the following cases:
· excavations for new dwellings, additions to dwellings, swimming pools or other substantial structures which are proposed to be located within the zone of influence of the footings of any dwelling, associated garage or other substantial structure located upon an adjoining premises;
· new dwellings or additions to dwellings sited up to shared property boundaries (e.g. additions to a semi-detached dwelling or terraced dwellings);
· excavations for new dwellings, additions to dwellings, swimming pools or other substantial structures which are within rock and may result in vibration and or potential damage to any dwelling, associated garage or other substantial structure located upon an adjoining premises;
· as otherwise may be required by the Principal Certifying Authority.
The dilapidation report shall include details of the current condition and status of any dwelling, associated garage or other substantial structure located upon the adjoining premises and shall include relevant photographs of the structures, to the satisfaction of the Principal Certifying Authority.
The dilapidation report must be submitted to the Council, the Principal Certifying Authority and the owners of the adjoining/nearby premises encompassed in the report, prior to commencing any site works (including any demolition work, excavation work or building work).
REQUIREMENTS DURING CONSTRUCTION & SITE WORK
The following conditions of consent must be complied with during the demolition, excavation and construction of the development.
These conditions have been applied to satisfy the relevant requirements of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979, Environmental Planning & Assessment Regulation 2000 and to provide reasonable levels of public health, safety and environmental amenity during construction.
Inspections during Construction
22. Building works are required to be inspected by the Principal Certifying Authority, in accordance with section 6.5 of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979 and clause 162A of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Regulation 2000, to monitor compliance with the relevant standards of construction, Council’s development consent and the construction certificate.
Excavations, Back-filling & Retaining Walls
23. All excavations and backfilling associated with the erection or demolition of a building (i.e. pool) must be executed safely in accordance with appropriate professional standards and excavations must be properly guarded and supported to prevent them from being dangerous to life, property or buildings, in particular, the existing buildings and structures on the adjoining site.
Retaining walls, shoring or piling must be provided to support land which is excavated in association with the erection or demolition of a building, to prevent the movement of soil and to support the adjacent land and buildings, if the soil conditions require it. Adequate provisions are also to be made for drainage.
Details of proposed retaining walls, shoring, piling or other measures are to be submitted to and approved by the Principal Certifying Authority.
Support of Adjoining Land
24. In accordance with section 4.17 (11) of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979 and clause 98 E of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Regulation 2000, it is a prescribed condition that the adjoining land and buildings located upon the adjoining land must be adequately supported at all times.
Sediment & Erosion Control
25. Sediment and erosion control measures, must be implemented throughout the site works in accordance with the manual for Managing Urban Stormwater – Soils and Construction, published by Landcom.
Details must be included in the Construction Site Management Plan and a copy must be provided to the Principal Certifying Authority and Council. A copy must also be maintained on site and be made available to Council officers upon request.
Public Safety & Site Management
26. Public safety and convenience must be maintained at all times during demolition, excavation and construction works and the following requirements must be complied with to the satisfaction of Council:
a) Building materials, sand, soil, waste materials, construction equipment or other articles must not be placed upon the footpath, roadway or nature strip at any time.
b) The road, footpath, vehicular crossing and nature strip must be maintained in a good, safe, clean condition and free from any excavations, obstructions, trip hazards, goods, materials, soils or debris at all times. Any damage caused to the road, footway, vehicular crossing, nature strip or any public place must be repaired immediately, to the satisfaction of Council.
c) All building and site activities (including storage or placement of materials or waste and concrete mixing/pouring/pumping activities) must not cause or be likely to cause ‘pollution’ of any waters, including any stormwater drainage systems, street gutters or roadways.
Note: It is an offence under the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 to cause or be likely to cause ‘pollution of waters’, which may result in significant penalties and fines.
d) Access gates and doorways within site fencing, hoardings and temporary site buildings or amenities must not open outwards into the road or footway.
e) Bulk bins/waste containers must not be located upon the footpath, roadway or nature strip at any time without the prior written approval of the Council. Applications to place a waste container in a public place can be made to Council’s Health, Building and Regulatory Services department.
f) Adequate provisions must be made to ensure pedestrian safety and traffic flow during the site works, and traffic control measures are to be implemented in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Roads and Traffic Manual “Traffic Control at Work Sites” (Version 4), to the satisfaction of Council.
Site Signage
27. A sign must be erected and maintained in a prominent position on the site for the duration of the works, which contains the following details:
· name, address, contractor licence number and telephone number of the principal contractor, including a telephone number at which the person may be contacted outside working hours, or owner-builder permit details (as applicable)
· name, address and telephone number of the Principal Certifying Authority,
· a statement stating that “unauthorised entry to the work site is prohibited”.
Restriction on Working Hours
28. Building, demolition and associated site works must be carried out in accordance with the following requirements:
Activity |
Permitted working hours |
All building, demolition and site work, including site deliveries (except as detailed below) |
· Monday to Friday - 7.00am to 5.00pm · Saturday - 8.00am to 5.00pm · Sunday & public holidays - No work permitted |
Excavating or sawing of rock, use of jack-hammers, pile-drivers, vibratory rollers/compactors or the like
|
· Monday to Friday - 8.00am to 1.00pm only · Saturday - No work permitted · Sunday & public holidays - No work permitted |
Additional requirements for all development |
· Saturdays and Sundays where the preceding Friday and/or the following Monday is a public holiday - No work permitted |
An application to vary the abovementioned hours may be submitted to Council’s Manager Health, Building & Regulatory Services for consideration and approval to vary the specified hours may be granted in exceptional circumstances and for limited occasions (e.g. for public safety, traffic management or road safety reasons). Any applications are to be made on the standard application form and include payment of the relevant fees and supporting information. Applications must be made at least 10 days prior to the date of the proposed work and the prior written approval of Council must be obtained to vary the standard permitted working hours.
REQUIREMENTS PRIOR TO THE ISSUE OF AN OCCUPATION CERTIFICATE
The following conditions of consent must be complied with prior to the ‘Principal Certifying Authority’ issuing an ‘Occupation Certificate’.
Note: For the purpose of this consent, any reference to ‘occupation certificate’ shall also be taken to mean ‘interim occupation certificate’ unless otherwise stated.
These conditions have been applied to satisfy the relevant requirements of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979, Environmental Planning & Assessment Regulation 2000, Council’s development consent and to maintain reasonable levels of public health, safety and amenity.
Occupation Certificate Requirements
29. An Occupation Certificate must be obtained from the Principal Certifying Authority prior to any occupation of the building work encompassed in this development consent (including alterations and additions to existing buildings), in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979.
BASIX Requirements & Certification
30. In accordance with Clause 154B of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Regulation 2000, a Certifying Authority must not issue an Occupation Certificate for this development, unless it is satisfied that any relevant BASIX commitments and requirements have been satisfied.
Relevant documentary evidence of compliance with the BASIX commitments is to be forwarded to the Principal Certifying Authority and Council upon issuing an Occupation Certificate.
Noise Control Requirements & Certification
31. The operation of plant and equipment shall not give rise to an ‘offensive noise’ as defined in the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 and Regulations.
In this regard, the operation of the plant and equipment shall not give rise to an LAeq, 15 min sound pressure level at any affected premises that exceeds the background LA90, 15 min noise level, measured in the absence of the noise source/s under consideration by more than 5dB(A) in accordance with relevant NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA) Noise Control Guidelines.
Swimming
32. Swimming pools are to be designed and installed in accordance with the relevant requirements of the Building Code of Australia and be provided with childproof fences and self-locking gates, in accordance with the Swimming Pools Act 1992 and the Swimming Pools Regulation 2008.
The swimming pool is to be surrounded by a child-resistant barrier (e.g. fence), that separates the pool from any residential building (as defined in the Swimming Pools Act 1992) that is situated on the premises and from any place (whether public or private) adjoining the premises; and that is designed, constructed and installed in accordance with Australian Standard AS 1926.1 – 2012 (Swimming Pool Safety Part 1 - Safety Barriers for Swimming Pools).
Gates to pool area must be self-closing and latching at all times and, the gate is required to open outwards from the pool area and prevent a small child opening the gate or door when the gate or door is closed.
Temporary pool safety fencing is to be provided pending the completion of all building work and the pool must not be filled until a fencing inspection has been carried out and approved by the principal certifying authority.
A ‘warning notice’ must be erected in a prominent position in the immediate vicinity of the swimming pool, in accordance with the provisions of the Swimming Pools Regulation 2008, detailing pool safety requirements, resuscitation techniques and the importance of the supervision of children at all times.
33. Swimming pools are to be designed, installed and operated in accordance with the following general requirements:
a) Backwash of the pool filter and other discharge of water is to be drained to the sewer in accordance with the requirements of the Sydney Water Corporation; and
b) All pool overflow water is to be drained away from the building and adjoining premises, so as not to result in a nuisance or damage to premises; and
c) Water recirculation and filtrations systems are required to comply with AS 1926.3 – 2010: Swimming Pool Safety – Water Recirculation and Filtration Systems; and
d) Pool plant and equipment is to be enclosed in a sound absorbing enclosure or installed within a building, to minimise noise emissions and possible nuisance to nearby residents.
Notification of Swimming Pools
34. The owner of the premises must ‘register’ the swimming pool [or spa pool] on the NSW Swimming Pool Register, in accordance with the Swimming Pools Amendment Act 2012.
The Swimming Pool Register is administered by the NSW Office of Local Government and registration on the Swimming Pool Register may be made on-line via their website www.swimmingpoolregister.nsw.gov.au.
Registration must be made prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate for the pool and a copy of the NSW Swimming Pool Certificate of Registration must be forwarded to the Principal Certifying Authority and Council accordingly.
OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS
The following operational conditions must be complied with at all times, throughout the use and operation of the development.
These conditions have been applied to satisfy the relevant requirements of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979, Environmental Planning & Assessment Regulation 2000, Council’s development consent and to maintain reasonable levels of public health and environmental amenity.
Plant & Equipment
35. Noise from the operation of all plant and equipment upon the premises shall not give rise to an ‘offensive noise’ as defined in the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 and Regulations.
In this regard, the operation of the plant and equipment shall not give rise to an LAeq, 15 min sound pressure level at any affected premises that exceeds the background LA90, 15 min noise level, measured in the absence of the noise source/s under consideration by more than 5dB(A) in accordance with relevant NSW Office of Environment & Heritage (EPA) Noise Control Guidelines.
Swimming/Spa Pools
36. The pool plant and equipment shall not be operated during the following hours if the noise emitted can be heard within a habitable room in any other residential premises, or, as otherwise specified in relevant Noise Control Regulations:
· before 8.00am or after 8.00pm on any Sunday or public holiday; or
· before 7.00am or after 8.00pm on any other day.
GENERAL ADVISORY NOTES
The following information is provided for your assistance to ensure compliance with the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979, Environmental Planning & Assessment Regulation 2000, or other relevant legislation and requirements. This information does not form part of the conditions of development consent pursuant to Section 4.17 of the Act.
A1 The requirements and provisions of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979 and Environmental Planning & Assessment Regulation 2000, must be fully complied with at all times.
Failure to comply with these requirements is an offence, which renders the responsible person liable to a maximum penalty of $1.1 million. Alternatively, Council may issue a penalty infringement notice (for up to $6,000) for each offence. Council may also issue notices and orders to demolish unauthorised or non-complying building work, or to comply with the requirements of Council’s development consent.
A2 In accordance with the requirements of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979, building works, including associated demolition and excavation works (as applicable) must not be commenced until:
§ A Construction Certificate has been obtained from an Accredited Certifier or Council,
§ An Accredited Certifier or Council has been appointed as the Principal Certifying Authority for the development,
§ Council and the Principal Certifying Authority have been given at least 2 days notice (in writing) prior to commencing any works.
A3 Council can issue your Construction Certificate and be your Principal Certifying Authority for the development, to undertake inspections and ensure compliance with the development consent and relevant building regulations. For further details contact Council on 9093 6944.
A4 This determination does not include an assessment of the proposed works under the Building Code of Australia (BCA), Disability (Access to Premises – Buildings) Standards 2010 and other relevant Standards. All new building work (including alterations and additions) must comply with the BCA and relevant Standards. You are advised to liaise with your architect, engineer and building consultant prior to lodgement of your construction certificate.
A5 Any proposed amendments to the design and construction of the building may require a new development application or a section 4.55 amendment to the existing consent to be obtained from Council, before carrying out such works
A6 A Local Approval application must be submitted to and be approved by Council prior to commencing any of the following activities on a footpath, road, nature strip or in any public place:-
§ Install or erect any site fencing, hoardings or site structures
§ Operate a crane or hoist goods or materials over a footpath or road
§ Placement of a waste skip or any other container or article.
For further information please contact Council on 9093 6971.
A7 Specific details of the location of the building/s should be provided in the Construction Certificate to demonstrate that the proposed building work will not encroach onto the adjoining properties, Council’s road reserve or any public place.
A8 This consent does not authorise any trespass or encroachment upon any adjoining or supported land or building whether private or public. Where any underpinning, shoring, soil anchoring (temporary or permanent) or the like is proposed to be carried out upon any adjoining or supported land, the land owner or principal contractor must obtain:
§ the consent of the owners of such adjoining or supported land to trespass or encroach, or
§ an access order under the Access to Neighbouring Land Act 2000, or
§ an easement under section 88K of the Conveyancing Act 1919, or
§ an easement under section 40 of the Land & Environment Court Act 1979, as appropriate.
Section 177 of the Conveyancing Act 1919 creates a statutory duty of care in relation to support of land. Accordingly, a person has a duty of care not to do anything on or in relation to land being developed (the supporting land) that removes the support provided by the supporting land to any other adjoining land (the supported land).
A9 External paths and ground surfaces are to be constructed at appropriate levels and be graded and drained away from the building and adjoining premises, so as not to result in the entry of water into the building, or cause a nuisance or damage to any adjoining land.
Finished ground levels external to the building are to be consistent with the development consent and are not to be raised, other than for the provision of approved paving or the like on the ground.
A10 Prior to commencing any works, the owner/builder should contact Dial Before You Dig on 1100 or www.dialbeforeyoudig.com.au and relevant Service Authorities, for information on potential underground pipes and cables within the vicinity of the development site.
A11 Council’s assessment of this application does not include an assessment of compliance with the Swimming Pool Act 1992. All pool barriers, fences and structures within properties containing a swimming pool must comply with the requirements of the Swimming Pool Act 1992, BCA and relevant Australian Standards.
Details of compliance with the Swimming Pool Act 1992, Building Code of Australia and relevant Standards must be included in the Construction Certificate to the satisfaction of the Certifying Authority.
Development Application Report No. D35/20
|
Subject: 36 The Avenue, Randwick (DA/653/2019) |
|
|
|
|
Subject Site |
|
|
|
Submissions received
Ù North
|
|
Locality Plan |
1. Executive summary
The application is referred to the Randwick Local Planning Panel (RLPP) as the development involves demolition of a Heritage Item and the Applicant has an affiliation with a Councillor.
The proposal seeks development consent for alterations and additions to an existing 3 storey terrace dwelling, including a new level above the existing garage at the rear of the site.
The existing terrace dwelling is part of a row of terraces (known as “Avonmore Terrace”) identified as a State Heritage Item and a local Heritage Item under Randwick Local Environmental Plan 2012 (RLEP 2012). The site is located within the St Jude Heritage Conservation Area (HCA) and in the vicinity of Heritage Items. The proposal is classified as Integrated Development, pursuant to Clause 4.6 of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act, 1979 (EP&A Act, 1979) and the application was referred to Heritage NSW seeking General Terms of Approval (GTAs).
The application was publicly notified to the surrounding properties in accordance with Council’s Community Participation Plan and no submissions were received.
The key issues associated with the proposal relate to heritage impacts and the addition above the existing garage at the rear of the site.
Heritage NSW issued GTAs, dated 16 June 2020, subject to minor design amendments and deletion of some proposed internal works at the upper levels of the terrace dwelling. A separate application under section 60 of the Heritage Act 1977 will be required to be submitted and approved by Heritage NSW, prior to commencement of the works. Council’s Heritage Planner also considers to the proposed alterations and additions to be acceptable from a heritage perspective, subject to the external finishes being approved by Council, prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate. Conditions to this effect are included in the recommended development consent.
The proposed studio addition above the garage will result in a minor non-compliance with the envelope controls for outbuilding development under Randwick Development Control Plan 2013 (RDCP 2013). However, the proposal sits comfortably with the adjoining built form context and will not result in any adverse amenity impacts to the adjoining properties. The proposed studio addition above the garage is contextually appropriate for the site and is therefore supported.
The proposal is recommended for approval, subject to conditions.
2. Site Description and Locality
The subject site is known as 36 The Avenue and is legally described as Lot A in DP 394820. The site is 314.4m2, is rectangular in shape and has a 7.24m frontage to The Avenue to the west and a 7.84m frontage to a private lane to the east.
The site contains a 3 storey terrace dwelling with a single level double garage at the rear fronting a private right of way. Refer to Figures 1 to 3.
The existing terrace dwelling is part of a row of terraces identified as a State heritage listed item (SHR No.00565) and identified as local Heritage Item the Randwick Local Environmental Plan 2012 (RLEP 2012) (I454). The site is located within the St Jude Heritage Conservation Area and in the vicinity of Heritage Items at Nos. 1-3 (I452) and 6 The Avenue (I453).
Figure 1 – View from the The Avenue
Figure 2 – View of existing single
storey garage and adjoining development to the north
Figure 3 – View of adjoining
development to the south
3. Relevant history
On 3 December 1993, Council granted development consent for alterations and additions to the existing dwelling (DA 413/1993).
4. Proposal
The proposal seeks development consent for alterations to the existing dwelling and an addition above the existing garage at the rear of the site. A detailed description of the building works is provided in Table 1.
Table 1 – Detailed description of the proposed works
Component |
Proposal |
Internal and external alterations to the existing dwelling |
Ground Floor · demolition of the bay window to the rear wing · new openings to the middle link · new void to the middle link · new kitchen and pantry fitout · replacement doors to the side and rear of the rear wing First Floor · conversion of the middle bedroom to a bathroom and robe · rehanging of the door to the rear verandah · new door to the front bedroom · new void to the mid landing · new small door to the robe. Second Floor · new ensuite off the rear bedroom · relocation of the bedroom door to form a sub hall · reconfiguration of the joinery to the front bedroom · rehanging of the door |
Addition above the garage |
· construction of a studio above the existing garage located partly in a mansard roof with arched windows to the garden and flat roof dormer windows to the rear lane. · The materiality includes coursed, rendered masonry with a metal roof and timber doors to the right of way. |
Landscaping |
· replacement paving to the rear yard · new pond at the garage |
5. Notification
The owners of adjoining and likely affected neighbouring properties were notified of the proposed development in accordance with Council’s Community Participation Plan. No submissions were received as a result of the notification process:
6. Relevant Environment Planning Instruments
6.1. SEPP 55 – Remediation of Land
State Environmental Planning Policy No. 55 - Remediation of Land (SEPP 55) applies to all land and aims to provide for a State-wide planning approach to the remediation of contaminated land.
Clause 7 of SEPP 55 requires the consent authority to consider whether land is contaminated prior to granting consent to the carrying out of any development on that land. There is no evident risk to human health and the environment in this case to warrant a more detailed investigation given the immediate surrounds have been used for residential purposes for a considerable number of years, and there have been no known potentially contaminating activities undertaken on the site. The subject site is not identified under RLEP 2012 as constituting contaminated land or land that must be subject to a site audit statement. Accordingly, nothing restricts Council, under SEPP 55, from consenting to the carrying out of the development.
6.2. SEPP (Vegetation in Non-Rural Areas) 2017
There existing front garden does not contain any significant vegetation. In any event there are no proposed landscape works in the front setback of the site. The rear private open space contains a mature ‘Sunburst’ (Honey Locust) along the southern boundary, located approximately 2.6m from the existing garage. Council’s Landscape officer raises no objection to the proposed works, subject to the imposition of appropriate tree management measures. Conditions to this effect are included in the recommended development consent. Refer to Section 7.1 of the report.
6.3. SEPP (Building Sustainability Index: BASIX) 2004
A separate BASIX certificate for the existing dwelling and the proposed studio above the garage has been submitted in accordance with the requirements of the SEPP (Building Sustainability Index: BASIX) 2004.
6.4. Randwick Local Environmental Plan 2012 (LEP)
The site is zoned R3 Medium Density Residential RLEP 2012 and the proposal is permissible with consent. The proposal is consistent with the objectives of the R3 zone because it will retain the heritage significance of the existing dwelling and protect the amenity of the adjoining properties.
The following development standards in RLEP 2012 apply to the proposal:
Clause |
Development Standard |
Proposal |
Compliance (Yes/No) |
Cl 4.4: Floor space ratio (max) |
0.9:1 |
0.86:1 |
Yes
|
Cl 4.3: Building height (max) |
12m |
No change to the height of the existing terrace dwelling.
6.3 m (studio/garage) |
Yes |
6.4.1. Clause 5.10 - Heritage conservation
As discussed in Section 2, the existing terrace dwelling on the site is part of a row of terraces identified as a State Heritage Item and a local Heritage Item under RLEP 2012. The site is located within the St Jude Heritage Conservation Area (HCA) and in the vicinity of Heritage Items. The proposal is supported by Heritage NSW, subject to minor design amendments and deletion of some proposed internal works at the upper levels of the terrace dwelling. Council’s Heritage Planner considers the proposal to be acceptable from a heritage perspective. The proposal is therefore consistent with this clause. The heritage impacts are discussed further in Section 8.
7. Development control plans and policies
7.1. Randwick Comprehensive DCP 2013 (RDCP 2013)
The RDCP 2013 provisions are structured into two components: objectives and controls. The objectives provide the framework for assessment under each requirement and outline key outcomes that a development is expected to achieve. The controls contain both numerical standards and qualitative provisions. Any proposed variations from the controls may be considered only where the applicant successfully demonstrates that an alternative solution could result in a more desirable planning and urban design outcome. The relevant provisions of the RDCP are addressed in Appendix 2.
8. Environmental Assessment
The site has been inspected and the application has been assessed having regard to Section 4.15 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979, as amended.
Section 4.15 ‘Matters for Consideration’ |
Comments |
Section 4.15 (1)(a)(i) – Provisions of any environmental planning instrument |
Refer to Section 6.
|
Section 4.15(1)(a)(ii) – Provisions of any draft environmental planning instrument |
Nil. |
Section 4.15(1)(a)(iii) – Provisions of any development control plan |
The proposal generally satisfies the objectives and controls of the RDCP 2013. See table in Appendix 2.
|
Section 4.15(1)(a)(iiia) – Provisions of any Planning Agreement or draft Planning Agreement |
Not applicable. |
Section 4.15(1)(a)(iv) – Provisions of the regulations |
The relevant clauses of the Regulations have been satisfied. |
Section 4.15(1)(b) – The likely impacts of the development, including environmental impacts on the natural and built environment and social and economic impacts in the locality |
The environmental impacts of the proposed development on the natural and built environment have been addressed in this report.
The proposed development is consistent with the dominant character in the locality. The proposal will not result in detrimental social or economic impacts on the locality. |
Section 4.15(1)(c) – The suitability of the site for the development |
The site is located in close proximity to local services and public transport. The site has sufficient area to accommodate the proposed land use and associated structures. Therefore, the site is considered suitable for the proposed development. |
Section 4.15(1)(d) – Any submissions made in accordance with the EP&A Act or EP&A Regulation
|
No submissions were received. |
Section 4.15(1)(e) – The public interest |
The proposal promotes the objectives of the R3 zone and will not result in any significant adverse environmental, social or economic impacts on the locality. Accordingly, the proposal is considered to be in the public interest. |
8.1. Discussion of Key Issues
Heritage Impacts
As discussed in Section 2, the existing terrace dwelling is part of a row of terraces identified as a State Heritage Item (SHR No.00565). The application is therefore an Integrated Development pursuant to Clause 4.6 of the EP&A Act, 1979 and was subsequently referred to Heritage NSW seeking GTAs.
Heritage NSW issued GTAs dated 16 June 2020, subject to minor design amendments to the partitions within the proposed robe at the first floor. Whilst Heritage NSW support the majority of the proposed works, the following internal works have not been approved:
· the modification to the door of the proposed robe at the first floor; and
· the ensuite at the second floor.
The Applicant is required to submit an application under Section 60 of the Heritage Act, 1977 to the Heritage Council of NSW, prior to commencing work, reflecting the internal modifications to the design identified in the GTAs. A condition requiring compliance with the conditions in the GTAs is included in the recommended development consent.
The site is also identified as a as a local Heritage Item under RLEP 2012 (I454). The site is located within the St Jude Heritage Conservation Area and in the vicinity of Heritage Items at Nos. 1-3 (I452) and 6 The Avenue (I453). Council’s Heritage Planner supports the proposal from a heritage perspective, subject to the external finishes being approved by Council, prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate. A condition to this effect is included in the recommended development consent.
Council’s Heritage Planner also considers the proposed studio addition above the garage to be consistent in scale, form and character to the existing development along the rear right of way and advises it would not dominate or detract from the setting of the heritage item or significant views from heritage items within the vicinity of the site.
Garage/Studio Addition
The proposal involves the construction of a studio addition above the existing detached garage adjoining a private lane providing access via a right-of-way at the rear of the site. The proposed addition will be located partly in a mansard roof with arched windows to the private open space of the main dwelling and flat roof dormers to the rear boundary. The building will be finished in coursed, rendered masonry with a metal roof and timber doors to the accessway.
Part C1 Section 7.4 of RDCP 2013 establishes the Outbuilding controls, which permit a first floor addition above an existing detached garage, subject to the floorspace being contained within the roof form as an attic and the design incorporating adequate articulation and the amenity of the adjoining properties being maintained.
The proposal is consistent with the Outbuilding controls in RDCP 2013 in that the studio addition will read as single storey structure when viewed from the rear private open space due to the mansard roof with arched dormers. Whilst the proposed addition will read as a two storey structure when viewed from the private lane adjoining to the east, the overall height provides an appropriate built form transition and will bring the existing single storey garage into alignment with that of the double storey adjoining structures (refer to Figure 4).
The proposed nil building setbacks to the side and rear boundaries of the site is compatible with the existing pattern of development along the private lane. The proposal will not result in any adverse amenity impacts to the adjoining properties in terms of overshadowing or visual privacy, and it contributes to the overall appearance and security of the private lane at the rear of the site. Council’s Heritage Planner has advised the proposed studio addition above the garage is consistent in scale, form and character to the existing development along the private lane and is acceptable from a heritage perspective.
It is considered the scale and design of the proposed garage/studio is contextually appropriate for the site and is therefore supported.
Figure 4 – Eastern elevation showing the adjoining development
9. Conclusion
That the application for alterations and additions to an existing three storey terrace dwelling, including a new level above the existing garage be approved (subject to conditions) for the following reasons:
· The proposal is consistent with the objectives contained within the RLEP 2012 and the relevant requirements of the RDCP 2013.
· The proposal will not result in any adverse impact on the heritage significance of the existing row of terrace dwellings or the St Jude HCA.
· The proposal will not result in any adverse amenity impacts to the adjoining properties.
· The scale and design of the proposed garage/studio is contextually appropriate for the site.
Appendix 1: Referrals
1. External referral comments:
1.1. Heritage NSW
The site is identified as a State Heritage Item and the proposal is therefore classified as Integrated Development, pursuant to Clause 4.6 of the EP&A Act, 1979.
Heritage NSW issued GTAs (DOC20/101623), dated 16 June 2020. The Applicant is required to comply with the conditions in the GTAs. A condition to this effect is included in the recommended development consent.
2. Internal referral comments:
2.1. Heritage Planner
The Site
No.36 The Avenue is located on the eastern side of The Avenue, Randwick. It is a centrally located terrace within of an attached row of established three storey Victorian terraces known as “Avonmore Terrace” which encompasses nos. 26-42. The row is located opposite Alison Park and is bounded by a rear lane cul-de-sac which runs in a northerly direction from Alison Road and terminates at the southern boundary of a garage/studio building situated at the rear of No.26 The Avenue.
The dwelling is a three storey painted masonry terrace with a number of decorative features to the principal elevation which are consistent along the row. These include ground floor elevation setback behind a narrow tessellated tile verandah and enclosed to the north and south by protruding party walls. Arched window openings existing on the ground and first floors. A timber verandah with iron balustrade and timber handrail and bullnose corrugated metal roof extends from the first floor level with French doors to first floor elevation. The second floor level comprises two arched windows with mid-level string course (matching the detail to the adjoining terraces within the row).
A two storey rear wing extends from the principal building form with a two storey painted brick extension. The rear elevation also comprises a first floor timber verandah with lace balustrade and valance.
The photographs and description of the dwelling provided within the HIS details that the dwelling contains a large number of original features but has been substantially modified with contemporary kitchen and bathroom fitouts and alterations to the rear wing. Photographs also show that the dwelling underwent substantial alterations for its use as a boarding house during the early twentieth century and later unsympathetic infill of the front verandah area during the mid-twentieth century. Some later additions to the internal decorative elements are also evident.
The rear courtyard and side passage are paved brick, and a timber pergola extends over the passage. A single storey garage structure bounds the site along the rear boundary.
The row is a State heritage listed item (SHR No.00565) and identified as item No.I454 within the Randwick LEP 2012. The site is located within the vicinity of a number of heritage items identified within the Randwick LEP 2012 including:
· State Heritage Item ‘St Jude’s Group’ (St Jude’s Anglican Church, Rectory, Old Borough Chambers and Hall (Note - Cemetery is at 21 Frances Street. (SHR No.00012) Heritage item nos.I374 and I271 within Schedule 5 the Randwick LEP 2012;
· Local heritage item ‘Hetta Building, commercial/residential building’, located at 110-116 Avoca Street and (Heritage Item No.I272);
· The remaining terrace buildings within the ‘Avonmore Terrace’ adjoining the subject dwelling to the south.
The site is located with the St Jude’s Heritage Conservation Area.
The NSW State Heritage Register provides the following ‘Statement of Significance’ for the site:
‘Avonmore is a group of nine Italianate terrace houses of imposing proportions. It was built by John Walsh who completed it in 1888. The row is significant for its Victorian Italianate style façade, its decorative detail and large rooms. Being located opposite Alison Park, it is important for the contribution it makes to the St. Judes Precinct. The elements of the row considered to be of high significance are the entire façade including the central tower and the verandahs with cast iron balustrades and corrugated iron roofs. The interiors (hallways, front rooms, stairs and fire places) of some of the houses are of high significance. The row of terraces demonstrates the process of subdivision and development in Randwick in the late 19th century and the wealth and expectations of the period. (Heritage Branch files).’
The St Jude’s Heritage Conservation Area is recognised for its aesthetic value due to its early church and civic buildings comprising the stone St Jude’s Church and Rectory with the cemetery behind, and late nineteenth century Town Hall and Randwick Public School, with Alison Park surrounded by late nineteenth and early twentieth century buildings, including a significant proportion of Federation dwellings. It also has historical and social significance due to its connection with Simeon Pearce’s promotion of Randwick with the establishment of the Church and of the Borough Council (one of the first established in the colony).
A site visit was carried out on 5 February 2020.
Background
In addition to the physical changes evident within the applicant’s historical research, Council’s records indicate that the land was subdivided into 5 lots on 1927, however there are no other details provided on the change in residential use. The next building application record is from 1982 for the construction of a double garage, and then further alterations and additions to the dwelling in 1989 and 1993.
Proposal
The proposal seeks the following alterations and additions to the existing dwelling:
· Ground floor alterations including removal of the bay window within the rear wing, new openings and void to the middle link, new kitchen and pantry fitout and replacement doors to the side and rear of the wing.
· First floor alterations include the conversion of the middle bedroom to a bathroom and robe, rehanging of the door to the rear verandah, new door to front bedroom and new void to mid-landing.
· Alterations at second floor level include new en-suite off the rear bedroom, relocation of the bedroom door with new sub-hall, reconfiguration of the joinery to the front bedroom and rehanging of the door.
· The proposed works also include the construction of a new two storey garage studio at the rear with access to the laneway. Landscaping works also include replacement of paving to the rear yard, new water feature (pond) adjacent to the garage.
Submission
The development application is accompanied by:
· Drawings prepared by Luigi Rosselli Pty Ltd received 5 December 2019;
· Heritage Impact Statement, prepared by John Oultram Heritage & Design, dated October 2019; and
· Statement of Environmental Effects, prepared by Luigi Rosselli Pty Ltd, dated November 2019.
Controls
Clause 5.10(1) of Randwick Local Environmental Plan 2012 includes and Objective of conserving the heritage significance of heritage items and heritage conservation areas, including associated fabric, setting and views. Clause 5.10(2) requires development consent for alterations to a heritage item. Clause 5.10(4) of Randwick Local Environmental Plan 2012 requires Council to consider the effect of the proposed development on the heritage significance of the heritage item or heritage conservation area, and Clause 5.10(5) requires a heritage management document for development affecting a heritage item, or on land within a heritage conservation area.
The Heritage section of Randwick Development Control Plan 2013 provided Objectives and Controls in relation to heritage properties.
Comments
Ground floor alterations
The proposal generally retains the layout and configuration of the front of the dwelling including the entry foyer, living and dining room areas and retention of existing decorative features including fireplaces, architraves, timber floors, skirtings and arched doorways with mouldings, as well as the original timber stair, balusters and handrail along the northern side of the hallway passage. The proposed works are primarily concentrated to the rear wing which has been previously modified. Works involve internal alterations to accommodate a new kitchen, convert existing mud room to a void area and reinstate original door, arch and door fanlight to side passage. The majority of these works would affect parts of the building previously altered with only partial impacts on the middle linking element between the original building and rear wing. The proposed new archway over the opening would be in keeping with the style and character.
Works to the rear wing also include the alterations to the southern elevation with the removal of the existing bay window and creation of a timber framed vertical bi-fold doorway, and the installation of a new matching opening further east along the wing, both providing access to side courtyard. Works to the eastern elevation of the wing at ground floor level include the installation of new bi-fold full length glazed doors to access the rear courtyard and installation of a retractable canvas awning over. The alterations to the ground level rear wing would not affect original significant fabric and the design of the new openings would be appropriate in terms of their architectural character, proportions, scale and style. Although not annotated on the drawings, the drawing legend lists that the new materials and finishes would include timber, glass and face/recycled brick. A condition requiring final colours and finishes is recommended.
First floor alterations
The proposal includes several notable alterations at first floor level. The master bedroom would be retained, along with its French doors and access to front verandah, its decorative features including fireplace (though non-original), and ceiling details (also non-original) would also be retained and conserved. Works involve the removal of the built-in cupboards and re-hinging of the main bedroom door (off landing) to the opposite side to improve access and are minor.
The works also include the conversion of the existing bedroom 1 to form an en-suite bathroom and walk-in robe. The conversion of the bedroom 1 to a bathroom would incorporate the creation of a new opening on the eastern wall between the master bedroom (with removal of part of the picture rails (which also appear to be non-original) to provide access to robe and en-suite.
Works to the bedroom include new tiling, and installation of plumbing, shower and toilet, however it is proposed to retain the existing fireplace along the southern wall as well as ceiling detail (although these decorative elements are also non-original). While the works result in the loss of a traditional bedroom, the proposal would retain the overall layout of the first floor, allowing continued interpretation of the original room configuration. The majority of its decorative features would be able to be retained and restored. The works would have a neutral impact on the significant of the dwelling. A condition is recommended that the tiling to the floor and walls be done on applied linings to allow existing finishes to be retained.
The existing smaller bathroom (bath 1) would be removed and converted to a void area with skylight above and the works would retain the existing bathroom (bath 2), the sitting room, study and laundry towards the rear of the wing in its current form.
The proposed works to the landing include the removal of the existing (non-original bathroom) and the creation of a new void area, which would be connected to the installation of a skylight within the roof above and to allow light penetration of light access to the ground floor. These works would have a positive impact on the functionality and aesthetic significance of the dwelling as it would remove the intrusive bathroom element and reinstate the quality of the leadlight detail above the landing and enhance the dwelling’s aesthetic significance.
Second floor level
There are additional works proposed at second floor level including the installation of a narrow bathroom to Bedroom 2 with the creation of a new wall which would run parallel to the existing northern wall, and the bedroom door would be relocated to the new bedroom wall. Minor additional works at this level also include the re-hinging of the existing door to Bedroom 3 and the removal of some internal joinery. The new bathroom would not result in a loss of significant fabric and would essentially retain the overall internal layout and room configuration at second floor level. Existing decorative features such as the fireplace (although non-original) would be retained and conserved and neutral impact on the building’s aesthetic significance.
Garage/studio
A single storey double garage is currently located along the rear boundary with access to the rear lane. The rear garage extends almost full width of the site, with a marginal setback from the southern boundary which provides a pedestrian entrance gate. The garage is rendered masonry construction with a metal roof. It is understood that the rear lane is under private ownership and residential owners of Avonmore Terrace have access via a Right of Way.
The western side of the rear lane is dominated by two storey garage and studio structures associated with Avonmore Terrace. To the site’s immediate north, is a two storey garage and studio structure associated with the boutique hotel at No. 34, and further north are similar two storey garage/studio forms associated with the residential uses of nos. 26-30.
The proposal seeks to retain the existing walls of the garage structure at ground floor level with a minor extension of the wall to the southern boundary and construction of a first floor studio dwelling above. The proposed structure would include a part mansard style roof on its western (in site) elevation and comprise a short gentle sloped roof (half mansard) extending from the ridge towards the east (laneway). Its height scale and form is generally consistent with surrounding development on the western side of the lane. The structure would sit below the ridge height of the garage/studio of No.34 to the north, and marginally higher than the similar structure located at No.38. It would be compatible in height and scale to adjacent rear lane development and not detract from the existing laneway character.
Treatment and detailing along the eastern elevation would comprise a new double garage door at ground level and installation of two vertical casement windows at first floor level (the tops of which extend into the roof area). In contrast, the drawings indicate that treatment along the western façade appears to include stone cladding/render to the eastern wall at ground level, and a mansard metal roof form extending over the first floor with three casement windows and timber shutters within the roof. Although not uniform in their design, the treatment to the elevations are generally consistent with both the character of rear lane development along the lane, and the style of the existing dwelling and would conserve the character of the laneway and setting of the heritage item.
A condition is also recommended that details of final colours and finishes for the proposed works are submitted to Council for approval, prior to issue of a construction certificate.
Landscaping works
The proposal aims to retain the existing landscaping within the front setback. The landscaping works primarily relate to the rear setback and involve paving within the courtyard, the retention of two existing trees within the south eastern corner of the existing courtyard and new low level planting along the northern and southern boundaries. The existing courtyard is paved and the proposal retains the established trees along the southern boundary. A small water feature (pond) at the rear of the courtyard extending from the western wall of the new garage is also proposed. The landscaping works retain the landscaped setting of the dwelling and is consistent with the confined landscaped setting of the rear courtyards within the row and meets the objectives and controls for gardens within the DCP.
Impacts on significant views and HCA
The proposed alterations and additions at ground, first and second floor levels would not be visible from The Avenue and would not impact on the Avonmore Terrace’s presentation to the streetscape. As previously discussed the proposed new garage and studio is consistent in scale, form and character to the existing development along the rear laneway and would not dominate or detract from the setting of the heritage item, and would not be visible from the public domain along The Avenue or from Alison Park or affect views from within the St Judes Conservation Area, or significant views from heritage items within the vicinity.
Recommendation
The following conditions should be included in any consent:
· Tiling to the floor and walls for the new bathroom at first floor level to be carried out on applied linings to allow existing finishes to be retained.
· The colours, materials and finishes of the external surfaces to the building are to be compatible with the existing building and surrounding buildings in the heritage conservation area and consistent with the architectural style of the building. Details of the proposed colours, materials and textures (i.e- a schedule and brochure/s or sample board) are to be submitted to and approved by Council’s Director City Planning, in accordance with Section 4.17 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 prior to a construction certificate being issued for the development.
2.2. Development Engineer
Council’s Development Engineer raised no objection, subject to the imposition of standard conditions. These conditions have been included in the recommended development consent.
The following comments were provided by Council’s Landscape Officer:
“Tree Management Comments
There is no significant vegetation in the front setback of the subject site, and as no works are proposed for this area, it will remain unchanged, so no conditions are needed or this area.
In the rear yard, along the southern site boundary, scaled off the plans to be about 2600mm from the western wall of the existing free-standing garage, is a large and mature, 12m x 12m Gleditsia triacanthos ‘Sunburst’ (Honey Locust, T2), of good health and condition, that is covered by the DCP.
It is easily this sites most established specimen, and was observed to have a prominence in this Randwick Heritage Conservation Area, as it occupies not only the entire width of the subject site, but also the adjoining properties to both its north and south.
The Arborists Reports notes the presence of existing structures and surfaces already within its TPZ, including paving, boundary fences and the garage, and whilst the southern wall of the garage is shown as being extended out onto the southern site boundary, along with a studio above, and a new water feature extending beyond its western wall, these works will not pose a major threat as they are within existing footprints, meaning that this tree can be retained situ as an existing site feature, with relevant protection conditions listed in this report.
While the Arborist has confirmed that major clearance pruning to allow for the studio above the existing garage will not be needed, conditions do allow the minor pruning of some smaller diameter branches, which given the amount involved, will not affect this tree in anyway.
The smaller, 3-4m tall Camelia (T2) immediately to its west is too small for the DCP, so while shown as being retained and incorporated into the new garden bed shown along this boundary, Council is unable to formally require this as part of this consent.”
Appendix 2: DCP Compliance Table
Part B2: Heritage
DCP Clause |
Controls |
Proposal |
Compliance (Yes/No/NA/ Conditioned) |
1.7 |
State Heritage Items |
||
|
Heritage items of State Significance in Schedule 5 of the RLEP are also listed on the NSW State Heritage Register. The NSW Heritage Council is the consent authority for any development proposal affecting State Heritage Items, or for any site covered by an Interim Heritage Order under the NSW Heritage Act 1977.
Consent from the NSW Heritage Council requires either the submission of an Integrated DA, or a prior Section 60 application under the NSW Heritage Act 1977.
Applicants are advised to consult with either Council or the Heritage Branch of the NSW Office of Environment and Heritage, in relation to works affecting State Heritage Items. |
The existing terrace dwelling is part of a row of terraces identified as a State heritage item (“Avonmore Terrace”) (SHR No.00565).
The application is therefore Integrated Development pursuant to Clause 4.6 of the EP&A Act, 1979 and was subsequently referred to Heritage NSW seeking its GTAs.
|
Yes |
1.13 |
Heritage Management Document |
||
|
A heritage impact assessment is generally required for development relating to a heritage item or property within a heritage conservation area including alterations and additions, demolition or construction of a replacement building.
A heritage impact assessment may also be required for development adjacent to or in the vicinity of a heritage item or heritage conservation area.
For major changes or demolition, the required Heritage Impact Statement should be prepared by a specialist heritage consultant able to advise on options to minimise heritage impact. |
The application is accompanied by a Heritage Impact Statement, prepared by John Outram. |
Yes |
2 |
Development Controls |
||
2.1 |
Heritage Items and Heritage conservations Areas |
||
|
All development must demonstrate how it respects the heritage values of the heritage item or the heritage conservation area.
The development controls in this section of RDCP 2013 primarily relate to new built form. The proposed alterations to the existing dwelling are largely internal and not visible within the streetscape. The proposed studio level addition above the garage is considered contextually appropriate for the site. |
The application is accompanied by a Heritage Impact Statement, prepared by John Outram. Council’s Heritage Planner considers the proposal to be acceptable from a heritage perspective. |
Yes |
4 |
Heritage Conservation Areas: Statements of Significance, Values and Guidelines |
||
4.17 |
Heritage Conservations Area St Judes |
||
|
The St Jude’s Heritage Conservation Area is recognised for its aesthetic value due to its early church and civic buildings comprising the stone St Jude’s Church and Rectory with the cemetery behind, and late nineteenth century Town Hall and Randwick Public School, with Alison Park surrounded by late nineteenth and early twentieth century buildings, including a significant proportion of Federation dwellings. It also has historical and social significance due to its connection with Simeon Pearce’s promotion of Randwick with the establishment of the Church and of the Borough Council (one of the first established in the colony). |
The site is located with the St Jude’s Heritage Conservation Area. Council’s Heritage Planner considers that the proposal will not have an adverse impact on the significance of the HCA. |
Yes |
Part C1: Low Density Residential
DCP Clause |
Controls |
Proposal |
Compliance (Yes/No/NA/ Conditioned) |
2.3 |
Site coverage |
||
|
Up to 300 sqm = 60% 301 to 450 sqm = 55% 451 to 600 sqm = 50% 601 sqm or above = 45% |
180m2 or 54% (as existing)
|
Yes |
2.4 |
Landscaping and permeable surfaces |
||
|
i) Up to 300 sqm = 20% ii) 301 to 450 sqm = 25% iii) 451 to 600 sqm = 30% iv) 601 sqm or above = 35% v) Deep soil minimum width 900mm. vi) Maximise permeable surfaces to front vii) Retain existing or replace mature native trees viii) Minimum 1 canopy tree (8m mature). Smaller (4m mature) If site restrictions apply. ix) Locating paved areas, underground services away from root zones. |
51m2 or 15.5%
The non-compliance is existing. The proposal includes improvements to the existing garden at the rear of the site, including the replacement of existing paving and is therefore acceptable. |
No |
2.5 |
Private open space (POS) |
||
|
Dwelling & Semi-Detached POS |
|
|
|
Up to 300 sqm = 5m x 5m 301 to 450 sqm = 6m x 6m 451 to 600 sqm = 7m x 7m 601 sqm or above = 8m x 8m |
6 m x 6 m (as existing)
|
Yes |
3 |
Building envelope |
||
3.1 |
Floor space ratio LEP 2012 = 0.9:1 |
0.87:1 |
Yes |
3.2 |
Building height |
|
|
|
Maximum overall height LEP 2012 = 9.5 m |
6.3m (proposed studio/garage)
There will be no change to the overall height of the existing terrace dwelling. |
Yes |
|
i) Maximum external wall height = 7m (Minimum floor to ceiling height = 2.7m) ii) Sloping sites = 8m iii) Merit assessment if exceeded |
6.45 m |
Yes |
3.3 |
Setbacks |
||
3.3.1 |
Front setbacks i) Average setbacks of adjoining (if none then no less than 6m) Transition area then merit assessment. ii) Corner allotments: Secondary street frontage: - 900mm for allotments with primary frontage width of less than 7m - 1500mm for all other sites iii) do not locate swimming pools, above-ground rainwater tanks and outbuildings in front |
There will be no change to the front setback of the existing dwelling. |
Yes |
3.3.2 |
Side setbacks: Semi-Detached Dwellings: · Frontage less than 6m = merit · Frontage b/w 6m and 8m = 900mm for all levels Refer to 6.3 and 7.4 for parking facilities and outbuildings |
The proposed studio addition to the garage will have a nil setback to the side boundary.
There will be no change to the side setback of the existing terrace dwelling. |
Yes |
3.3.3 |
Rear setbacks i) Minimum 25% of allotment depth or 8m, whichever lesser. Note: control does not apply to corner allotments. ii) Provide greater than aforementioned or demonstrate not required, having regard to: - Existing predominant rear setback line - reasonable view sharing (public and private) - protect the privacy and solar access iii) Garages, carports, outbuildings, swimming or spa pools, above-ground water tanks, and unroofed decks and terraces attached to the dwelling may encroach upon the required rear setback, in so far as they comply with other relevant provisions. iv) For irregularly shaped lots = merit assessment on basis of:- - Compatibility - POS dimensions comply - minimise solar access, privacy and view sharing impacts
Refer to 6.3 and 7.4 for parking facilities and outbuildings |
The proposed studio addition to the garage will have a nil setback to the rear boundary.
No change to the existing dwelling. |
Yes |
4 |
Building design |
||
4.1 |
General |
||
|
Respond specifically to the site characteristics and the surrounding natural and built context - · articulated to enhance streetscape · stepping building on sloping site, · no side elevation greater than 12 m · encourage innovative design |
The proposed studio addition to the garage is contextually appropriate for the site.
There will be no change to the existing dwelling. |
Yes |
4.5 |
Colours, Materials and Finishes |
||
|
i) Schedule of materials and finishes ii) Finishing is durable and non-reflective. iii) Minimise expanses of rendered masonry at street frontages (except due to heritage consideration) iv) Articulate and create visual interest by using combination of materials and finishes. v) Suitable for the local climate to withstand natural weathering, ageing and deterioration. vi) recycle and re-use sandstone (See also section 8.3 foreshore area.) |
The proposed studio addition to the garage includes rolled roof sheeting and rendered wall finish. Council’s Heritage Planner has recommended the colours, materials and finishes of the external surfaces to the building are to be compatible with the existing building and surrounding buildings in the HCA and consistent with the architectural style of the building.
|
Yes, subject to condition. |
5 |
Amenity |
||
5.1 |
Solar access and overshadowing |
||
|
Solar access to proposed development: |
|
|
|
i) Portion of north-facing living room windows must receive a minimum of 3 hrs direct sunlight between 8am and 4pm on 21 June ii) POS (passive recreational activities) receive a minimum of 3 hrs of direct sunlight between 8am and 4pm on 21 June. |
The living room windows at the northeast elevation and rear southeast elevation will be retained. There will be no change to the solar access at ground level. However, the proposed open plan living, kitchen and dining area at the rear of the dwelling will improve ambient light and internal amenity for the occupants.
There will be some minor reduction to solar access to the private open space in the morning to midday at the winter solstice due to shadows cast by the proposed addition above the garage, however the reduction does not reduce sunlight access to less than three hours in accordance with Council’s solar access requirements.
The proposed studio above the garage has east and west facing windows which will receive a minimum of three hours sunlight at the winter solstice. |
Yes |
|
Solar access to neighbouring development: |
|
|
|
i) Portion of the north-facing living room windows must receive a minimum of 3 hours of direct sunlight between 8am and 4pm on 21 June. iv) POS (passive recreational activities) receive a minimum of 3 hrs of direct sunlight between 8am and 4pm on 21 June. v) Solar panels on neighbouring dwellings, which are situated not less than 6m above ground level (existing), must retain a minimum of 3 hours of direct sunlight between 8am and 4pm on 21 June. If no panels, direct sunlight must be retained to the northern, eastern and/or western roof planes (not <6m above ground) of neighbouring dwellings. vi) Variations may be acceptable subject to a merits assessment with regard to: · Degree of meeting the FSR, height, setbacks and site coverage controls. · Orientation of the subject and adjoining allotments and subdivision pattern of the urban block. · Topography of the subject and adjoining allotments. · Location and level of the windows in question. · Shadows cast by existing buildings on the neighbouring allotments. |
The shadow diagrams submitted with the application indicate additional overshadowing to the private right of way at 12:00pm at the winter solstice due to the proposed addition above the garage.
The proposal will not result in any unreasonable shadow impacts to the adjoining properties.
|
Yes |
5.2 |
Energy Efficiency and Natural Ventilation |
||
|
i) Provide day light to internalised areas within the dwelling (for example, hallway, stairwell, walk-in-wardrobe and the like) and any poorly lit habitable rooms via measures such as: · Skylights (ventilated) · Clerestory windows · Fanlights above doorways · Highlight windows in internal partition walls ii) Where possible, provide natural lighting and ventilation to any internalised toilets, bathrooms and laundries iii) living rooms contain windows and doors opening to outdoor areas Note: The sole reliance on skylight or clerestory window for natural lighting and ventilation is not acceptable |
The application is accompanied by a BASIX Certificate and is therefore acceptable in respect of energy efficiency.
The modification to windows at the rear will improve light penetration to the dwelling. |
Yes |
5.3 |
Visual Privacy |
||
|
Windows |
|
|
|
i) Proposed habitable room windows must be located to minimise any direct viewing of existing habitable room windows in adjacent dwellings by one or more of the following measures: - windows are offset or staggered - minimum 1600mm window sills - Install fixed and translucent glazing up to 1600mm minimum. - Install fixed privacy screens to windows. - Creating a recessed courtyard (minimum 3m x 2m). ii) Orientate living and dining windows away from adjacent dwellings (that is orient to front or rear or side courtyard) |
There will be no change to the window openings at the first floor of the existing dwelling. The western elevation of the studio level addition above the garage will contain three windows orientated 90 degrees from the side boundaries with privacy shutters to allow solar and privacy control, as desired. It is noted the studio above the garage at No. 38 The Avenue also contains windows at the first floor western elevation. Given the small size of the studio it is not likely to result in any unreasonable privacy impacts to the rear of the adjoining properties. |
Yes |
5.4 |
Acoustic Privacy |
||
|
i) noise sources not located adjacent to adjoining dwellings bedroom windows Attached dual occupancies ii) Reduce noise transmission between dwellings by: - Locate noise-generating areas and quiet areas adjacent to each other. - Locate less sensitive areas adjacent to the party wall to serve as noise buffer. |
The design and layout of the proposed studio is appropriate to minimise acoustic privacy impacts. |
Yes |
5.5 |
Safety and Security |
||
|
i) Dwelling’s main entry on front elevation (unless narrow site) ii) Street numbering at front near entry. iii) 1 habitable room window (glazed area min 2 square metres) overlooking the street or a public place. iv) Front fences, parking facilities and landscaping does not to obstruct casual surveillance (maintain safe access) |
The studio design incorporates windows at the eastern elevation to maximise casual surveillance opportunities to the adjoining right of way. |
Yes |
5.6 |
View Sharing |
||
|
i) Reasonably maintain existing view corridors or vistas from the neighbouring dwellings, streets and public open space areas. ii) Retaining existing views from the living areas are a priority over low use rooms iii) Retaining views for the public domain takes priority over views for the private properties iv) Fence design and plant selection must minimise obstruction of views v) Adopt a balanced approach to privacy protection and view sharing vi) Demonstrate any steps or measures adopted to mitigate potential view loss impacts in the DA. (certified height poles used) |
The proposal will not result in any unreasonable view impacts from the surrounding properties.
|
Yes |
6 |
Car Parking and Access |
||
6.1 |
Location of Parking Facilities: |
|
|
|
i) Maximum 1 vehicular access ii) Locate off rear lanes, or secondary street frontages where available. iii) Locate behind front façade, within the dwelling or positioned to the side of the dwelling. Note: See 6.2 for circumstances when parking facilities forward of the front façade alignment may be considered. iv) Single width garage/carport if frontage <12m; Double width if: - Frontage >12m, - Consistent with pattern in the street; - Landscaping provided in the front yard. v) Minimise excavation for basement garages vi) Avoid long driveways (impermeable surfaces) |
The existing provision of two car spaces in the garage will not change.
|
Yes |
7.4 |
Outbuildings |
||
|
i) Locate behind the alignment of the front building façade. ii) Position to optimise backyard space and must not be located within the required permeable surfaces. iii) Except for laneway development, outbuildings must be single storey only, and must not exceed a maximum height of 3.6m and a wall height of 2.4m. iv) Outbuildings may be constructed to the side and rear boundaries where: - The external walls are finished and do not require frequent maintenance; - There are no windows or openings facing the adjoining allotments; and - Adequate solar access to the adjoining dwellings is maintained. v) Where there is an existing detached garage at the rear of the allotment, a first floor addition may be considered subject to the following measures: - Contain the upper floor level within the roof form as an attic storey; - Articulate the facades; - Provide an integrated landscape design with screen planting to visually soften the outbuilding; - Does not create excessive structural bulk as viewed from the adjoining properties; - Maintain adequate solar access to the adjoining dwellings; and - Maintain adequate privacy to the adjoining dwellings. vi) Outbuildings may be used as habitable space, but must not be used as a separate business premises
|
The proposed addition above the garage will be located behind the main dwelling at the rear of the site.
The proposed addition above the garage does not contain any windows along the side elevations. The nil setback to the side and rear boundaries is compatible with the two storey structures on the adjoining properties.
The proposed studio above the garage will read as single storey structure when viewed from the rear private open space. Whilst the proposed addition will read as a two storey structure when viewed from the private lane, it is considered to be contextually appropriate for the site. |
Refer to the Key Issues section of this report. |
1.⇩ |
Conditions - 36 The Avenue, Randwick - DA/653/2019 |
|
Responsible officer: Plandev Pty Ltd, Thomas Mithen
File Reference: DA/653/2019
Conditions - 36 The Avenue, Randwick - DA/653/2019 |
Attachment 1 |
Folder /DA No: |
DA/653/2019 |
Property: |
36 The Avenue, RANDWICK NSW 2031 |
Proposal: |
Alterations and additions to an existing 3 storey terrace dwelling, including a new level above the existing garage (Heritage Item). |
Recommendation: |
Approval |
Development Consent Conditions
GENERAL CONDITIONS
The development must be carried out in accordance with the following conditions of consent.
These conditions have been applied to satisfy the relevant requirements of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979, Environmental Planning & Assessment Regulation 2000 and to provide reasonable levels of environmental amenity.
Approved Plans & Supporting Documentation
1. The development must be implemented substantially in accordance with the plans and supporting documentation listed below and endorsed with Council’s approved stamp, except where amended by Council in red and/or by other conditions of this consent:
Plan |
Drawn by |
Dated |
Received by Council |
DA02 Site and Roof Plan Issue A |
Luigi Rosselli |
29 November 2019 |
5 December 2019 |
DA03 Ground Floor Plan Issue A |
Luigi Rosselli |
29 November 2019 |
5 December 2019 |
DA04 First Floor Plan Issue A |
Luigi Rosselli |
29 November 2019 |
5 December 2019 |
DA05 Second Floor Plan Issue A |
Luigi Rosselli |
29 November 2019 |
5 December 2019 |
DA06 Elevations Issue A |
Luigi Rosselli |
29 November 2019 |
5 December 2019 |
DA07 Elevations Issue A |
Luigi Rosselli |
29 November 2019 |
5 December 2019 |
DA08 Elevations Issue A |
Luigi Rosselli |
29 November 2019 |
5 December 2019 |
DA09 Section Issue A |
Luigi Rosselli |
29 November 2019 |
5 December 2019 |
BASIX Certificate No. |
Dated |
Received by Council |
A360488 |
29 November 2019 |
5 December 2019 |
1041447S |
29 November 2019 |
5 December 2019 |
Heritage NSW – General Terms of Approval
2. The conditions contained in the General Terms of Approval issued by Heritage NSW (DOC20/101623), dated 16 June 2020 shall be complied with. A separate application under section 60 of the Heritage Act 1977 will be required to be submitted and approved by Heritage NSW, prior to commencement of the works.
REQUIREMENTS BEFORE A CONSTRUCTION CERTIFICATE CAN BE ISSUED
The following conditions of consent must be complied with before a ‘Construction Certificate’ is issued by either Randwick City Council or an Accredited Certifier. All necessary information to demonstrate compliance with the following conditions of consent must be included in the documentation for the construction certificate.
These conditions have been applied to satisfy the relevant requirements of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979, Environmental Planning & Assessment Regulation 2000, Council’s development consent conditions and to achieve reasonable levels of environmental amenity.
Consent Requirements
3. The requirements and amendments detailed in the ‘General Conditions’ must be complied with and be included in the construction certificate plans and associated documentation.
Colours and Materials
4. The colours, materials and finishes of the external surfaces to the building are to be compatible with the existing building and surrounding buildings in the heritage conservation area and consistent with the architectural style of the building. Details of the proposed colours, materials and textures (i.e., a schedule and brochure/s or sample board) are to be submitted to and approved by Council’s Director City Planning, prior to a construction certificate being issued for the development.
Section 7.12 Development Contributions
5. In accordance with Council’s Development Contributions Plan effective from 21 April 2015, based on the development cost of $424,380 the following applicable monetary levy must be paid to Council: $4,243.80.
The levy must be paid in cash, bank cheque or by credit card prior to a construction certificate being issued for the proposed development. The development is subject to an index to reflect quarterly variations in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) from the date of Council’s determination to the date of payment. Please contact Council on telephone 9093 6999 or 1300 722 542 for the indexed contribution amount prior to payment.
To calculate the indexed levy, the following formula must be used:
IDC = ODC x CP2/CP1
Where:
IDC = the indexed development cost
ODC = the original development cost determined by the Council
CP2 = the Consumer Price Index, All Groups, Sydney, as published by the ABS in respect of the quarter ending immediately prior to the date of payment
CP1 = the Consumer Price Index, All Groups, Sydney as published by the ABS in respect of the quarter ending immediately prior to the date of imposition of the condition requiring payment of the levy.
Council’s Development Contribution Plans may be inspected at the Customer Service Centre, Administrative Centre, 30 Frances Street, Randwick or at www.randwick.nsw.gov.au.
Compliance Fee
6. A development compliance and enforcement fee of $424.38 shall be paid to Council in accordance with Council’s adopted Fees & Charges Pricing Policy, prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate for development.
Long Service Levy Payments
7. The required Long Service Levy payment, under the Building and Construction Industry Long Service Payments Act 1986, must be forwarded to the Long Service Levy Corporation or the Council, in accordance with Section 6.8 of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979.
At the time of this development consent, Long Service Levy payment is applicable on building work having a value of $25,000 or more, at the rate of 0.35% of the cost of the works.
Security Deposits
8. The following security deposits requirement must be complied with prior to a construction certificate being issued for the development, as security for making good any damage caused to Council’s assets and infrastructure; and as security for completing any public work; and for remedying any defect on such public works, in accordance with section 4.17(6) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979:
· $600 - Damage / Civil Works Security Deposit
The security deposits may be provided by way of a cash, cheque or credit card payment and is refundable upon a satisfactory inspection by Council upon the completion of the works which confirms that there has been no damage to Council's assets and infrastructure.
The developer/builder is also requested to advise Council in writing and/or photographs of any signs of existing damage to the Council roadway, footway, or verge and other assets prior to the commencement of any building/demolition works.
To obtain a refund of relevant deposits, a Security Deposit Refund Form is to be forwarded to Council’s Development Engineer upon issuing of an occupation certificate or completion of the civil works.
Sydney Water Requirements
9. All building, plumbing and drainage work must be carried out in accordance with the requirements of the Sydney Water Corporation.
The approved plans must be submitted to the Sydney Water Tap in™ online service, to determine whether the development will affect Sydney Water’s waste water and water mains, stormwater drains and/or easements, and if any further requirements need to be met.
The Sydney Water Tap in™ online service replaces the Quick Check Agents as of 30 November 2015
The Tap in™ service provides 24/7 access to a range of services, including:
· Building plan approvals
· Connection and disconnection approvals
· Diagrams
· Trade waste approvals
· Pressure information
· Water meter installations
· Pressure boosting and pump approvals
· Change to an existing service or asset, e.g. relocating or moving an asset.
Sydney Water’s Tap in™ in online service is available at:
https://www.sydneywater.com.au/SW/plumbing-building-developing/building/sydney-water-tap-in/index.htm
The Principal Certifying Authority must ensure that the developer/owner has submitted the approved plans to Sydney Water Tap in online service.
Tree Protection Measures
10. In order to ensure retention of the large and mature Gleditsia triacanthos ‘Sunburst’ (Honey Locust, T1) located in the rear setback of the subject site, on the southern boundary in good health, the following measures are to be undertaken:
a. All documentation submitted for the Construction Certificate application must show its retention, with the position and diameter of both its trunk and canopy to be clearly and accurately shown on all plans in relation to the works.
b. Any excavations associated with the installation of new services, pipes, stormwater systems or similar in the rear setback must be consistent with what is shown on the Stormwater Drainage Services – Ground Floor Plan & Details by Partridge Hydraulic Services, dwg SWDA 1.2, rev P1, dated 15/11/19, with the Certifying Authority/PCA to confirm that all services plans are both prepared and then installed on-site in accordance with this requirement.
c. All Construction Certificate plans must show that the footprint of the garage/studio and water feature will be consistent with what is shown on the Ground Floor Plan, dwg DA03, in terms of their size and setback to the tree, with distances in millimetres to its trunk to be provided.
d. All Construction Certificate plans must also include a notation stating that “the existing paving in the rear setback, surrounding the tree, must be retained in-situ throughout the course of works as a form of ground protection”, and if this paving is to be removed and replaced, this must be the last component of works performed.
e. Ground levels within the rear courtyard must be consistent with what has been shown on the Ground Floor Plan, dwg DA03, and other than the approved works, there must be no other new structures such as continuous strip footings, planter boxes or similar.
f. Prior to the commencement of any site works, its trunk (as well as any lower affected branches) are to be physically protected by wrapping layers of geo-textile, underfelt or Hessian, from ground level to a minimum height of 2m, to which, 2m lengths of 50mm x 100mm hardwood timbers, spaced at 150mm centres shall be placed around its circumference, and are to be secured by 8 gauge wires or steel strapping at 300mm spacing. NO nailing to the trunk.
g. This protection shall be installed prior to the commencement of demolition and construction works and shall remain in place until all works are completed, to which, signage containing the following words shall be clearly displayed and permanently attached: “TREE PROTECTION, DO NOT REMOVE".
h. In order to prevent soil/sediment being washed over its root system, erosion control measures must be installed at ground level, along the edge of the paving to the north of its trunk.
i. There is to be no storage of materials, machinery or site office/sheds, nor is cement to be mixed or chemicals spilt/disposed of and no stockpiling of soil or rubble around its trunk, with all Site Management Plans to acknowledge these requirements.
j. Where roots are encountered which are in direct conflict with the approved works, they may be cut cleanly by hand (using only hand held tools, not machinery), with the affected area to be backfilled with clean site soil as soon as practically possible.
k. Any new common boundary fencing, within its 6 metre TPZ radius, can only be a system which is supported on localised pad footings, not strip footings, with details confirming compliance to be shown on all Construction Certificate plans.
l. If roots are encountered during installation of footings for new dividing fencing, these footings must be re-positioned to allow their preservation.
m. The PCA must ensure compliance with all of these requirements, both on the plans as well as on-site during the course of construction, and prior to issuing any type of Occupation Certificate.
REQUIREMENTS TO BE INCLUDED IN THE CONSTRUCTION CERTIFICATE
The requirements contained in the following conditions of consent must be complied with and details of compliance must be included in the construction certificate for the development.
These conditions have been applied to satisfy the relevant requirements of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979, Environmental Planning & Assessment Regulation 2000, Councils development consent conditions and to achieve reasonable levels of environmental amenity.
Compliance with the Building Code of Australia & Relevant Standards
11. In accordance with section 4.17 (11) of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979 and clause 98 of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Regulation 2000, it is a prescribed condition that all building work must be carried out in accordance with the provisions of the Building Code of Australia (BCA).
BASIX Requirements
12. In accordance with section 4.17 (11) of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979 and clause 97A of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Regulation 2000, the requirements and commitments contained in the relevant BASIX Certificate must be complied with.
The required commitments listed and identified in the BASIX Certificate must be included on the construction certificate plans, specifications and associated documentation, to the satisfaction of the Certifying Authority.
The design of the building must not be inconsistent with the development consent and any proposed variations to the building to achieve the BASIX commitments may necessitate a new development consent or amendment to the existing consent to be obtained, prior to a construction certificate being issued.
Stormwater Drainage
13. A surface water/stormwater drainage system must be provided in accordance with the following requirements, to the satisfaction of the Certifying Authority and details are to be included in the construction certificate:-
a) Surface water/stormwater drainage systems must be provided in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Building Code of Australia (Volume 2) and relevant Standards;
b) The surface water/stormwater must be drained and discharged to the street gutter or, subject to site suitability, the stormwater may be drained to a suitably designed absorption pit;
c) Any absorption pits or soaker wells should be located not less than 3m from any adjoining premises and the stormwater must not be directed to any adjoining premises or cause a nuisance;
d) External paths and ground surfaces are to be constructed at appropriate levels and be graded and drained away from the building and adjoining premises, so as not to result in the entry of water into the building, or cause a nuisance or damage to the adjoining premises;
e) Details of any proposed drainage systems or works to be carried out in the road, footpath or nature strip must be submitted to and approved by Council before commencing these works:
f) A certificate, from a suitably qualified person must be submitted to the PCA and Council, prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate, which confirms that the stormwater drainage system has been provided in accordance with the requirements of this consent, relevant standards and requirements.
Bathroom Tiling
14. The tiling to the floor and walls for the new bathroom at first floor level be carried out on applied linings to allow existing finishes to be retained.
REQUIREMENTS PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORKS
The following conditions of consent must be complied with prior to the commencement of any works on the site. The necessary documentation and information must be provided to the Council or the ‘Principal Certifying Authority’, as applicable.
These conditions have been applied to satisfy the relevant requirements of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979, Environmental Planning & Assessment Regulation 2000 and to provide reasonable levels of public health, safety and environmental amenity.
Certification and Building Inspection Requirements
15. Prior to the commencement of any building works, the following requirements must be complied with:
a) a Construction Certificate must be obtained from the Council or an accredited certifier, in accordance with the provisions of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979.
A copy of the construction certificate, the approved development consent plans and consent conditions must be kept on the site at all times and be made available to the Council officers and all building contractors for assessment.
b) a Principal Certifying Authority (PCA) must be appointed to carry out the necessary building inspections and to issue an occupation certificate; and
c) a principal contractor must be appointed for the building work, or in relation to residential building work, an owner-builder permit may be obtained in accordance with the requirements of the Home Building Act 1989, and the PCA and Council are to be notified accordingly; and
d) the principal contractor must be advised of the required critical stage inspections and other inspections to be carried out, as specified by the Principal Certifying Authority; and
e) at least two days notice must be given to the Council, in writing, prior to commencing any works.
Section 60 Application – Heritage NSW
16. Prior to commencement of any building works, an application under section 60 of the Heritage Act 1977 must be submitted to, and approved by, the Heritage Council of NSW (or delegate). The Section 60 application must incorporate the modifications and requirements in the General terms of Approval issued by Heritage NSW dated 16 June 2020.
Home Building Act 1989
17. In accordance with section 4.17 (11) of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979 and clause 98 of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Regulation 2000, the relevant requirements of the Home Building Act 1989 must be complied with.
Details of the Licensed Building Contractor and a copy of the relevant Certificate of Home Warranty Insurance or a copy of the Owner-Builder Permit (as applicable) must be provided to the Principal Certifying Authority and Council.
Dilapidation Reports
18. A dilapidation report must be obtained from a Professional Engineer, Building Surveyor or other suitably qualified independent person, in the following cases:
· excavations for new dwellings, additions to dwellings, swimming pools or other substantial structures which are proposed to be located within the zone of influence of the footings of any dwelling, associated garage or other substantial structure located upon an adjoining premises;
· new dwellings or additions to dwellings sited up to shared property boundaries (e.g. additions to a semi-detached dwelling or terraced dwellings);
· excavations for new dwellings, additions to dwellings, swimming pools or other substantial structures which are within rock and may result in vibration and or potential damage to any dwelling, associated garage or other substantial structure located upon an adjoining premises;
· as otherwise may be required by the Principal Certifying Authority.
The dilapidation report shall include details of the current condition and status of any dwelling, associated garage or other substantial structure located upon the adjoining premises and shall include relevant photographs of the structures, to the satisfaction of the Principal Certifying Authority.
The dilapidation report must be submitted to the Council, the Principal Certifying Authority and the owners of the adjoining/nearby premises encompassed in the report, prior to commencing any site works (including any demolition work, excavation work or building work).
Construction Noise & Vibration Management Plan
19. Noise and vibration emissions during the construction of the building and associated site works must not result in damage to nearby premises or result in an unreasonable loss of amenity to nearby residents and the relevant requirements of the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 and NSW EPA Guidelines must be satisfied at all times.
Noise and vibration from any rock excavation machinery, pile drivers and all plant and equipment must be minimised, by using appropriate plant and equipment, silencers and the implementation of noise management strategies.
A Construction Noise Management Plan, prepared in accordance with the NSW EPA Construction Noise Guideline by a suitably qualified person, is to be implemented throughout the works, to the satisfaction of the Council. A copy of the strategy must be provided to the Principal Certifying Authority and Council prior to the commencement of works on site.
Construction Site Management Plan
20. A Construction Site Management Plan must be developed and implemented prior to the commencement of any works. The construction site management plan must include the following measures, as applicable to the type of development:
· location and construction of protective site fencing / hoardings;
· location of site storage areas/sheds/equipment;
· location of building materials for construction;
· provisions for public safety;
· dust control measures;
· details of proposed sediment and erosion control measures;
· site access location and construction
· details of methods of disposal of demolition materials;
· protective measures for tree preservation;
· location and size of waste containers/bulk bins;
· provisions for temporary stormwater drainage;
· construction noise and vibration management;
· construction traffic management details;
· provisions for temporary sanitary facilities.
The site management measures must be implemented prior to the commencement of any site works and be maintained throughout the works, to the satisfaction of Council.
A copy of the Construction Site Management Plan must be provided to the Principal Certifying Authority and Council prior to commencing site works. A copy must also be maintained on site and be made available to Council officers upon request.
Demolition Work
21. Demolition Work must be carried out in accordance with Australian Standard AS2601-2001, Demolition of Structures and relevant work health and safety requirements.
A Demolition Work Plan must be prepared for the demolition works which should be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority (PCA), not less than two (2) working days before commencing any demolition work. A copy of the Demolition Work Plan must be maintained on site and be made available to Council officers upon request.
If the work involves asbestos products or materials, a copy of the Demolition Work Plan must also be provided to Council not less than 2 days before commencing those works.
Demolition & Construction Waste Plan
22. A Demolition and Construction Waste Management Plan (WMP) must be development and implemented for the development.
The Waste Management Plan must provide details of the type and quantities of demolition and construction waste materials, proposed re-use and recycling of materials, methods of disposal and details of recycling outlets and land fill sites.
Where practicable waste materials must be re-used or recycled, rather than disposed and further details of Council's requirements including relevant guidelines and pro-forma WMP forms can be obtained from Council's Customer Service Centre or by telephoning Council on 1300 722 542.
Details and receipts verifying the recycling and disposal of materials must be kept on site at all times and presented to Council officers upon request.
Public Utilities
23. A Public Utility Impact Assessment must be carried out to identify all public utility services located on the site, roadway, nature strip, footpath, public reserve or any public areas associated with and/or adjacent to the building works.
Documentary evidence from the relevant public utility authorities confirming that their requirements have been or are able to be satisfied, must be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the commencement of any works.
The owner/builder must make the necessary arrangements and meet the full cost for telecommunication companies, gas providers, Energy Australia, Sydney Water and other authorities to adjust, repair or relocate their services as required.
REQUIREMENTS DURING CONSTRUCTION & SITE WORK
The following conditions of consent must be complied with during the demolition, excavation and construction of the development.
These conditions have been applied to satisfy the relevant requirements of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979, Environmental Planning & Assessment Regulation 2000 and to provide reasonable levels of public health, safety and environmental amenity during construction.
Inspections during Construction
24. Building works are required to be inspected by the Principal Certifying Authority, in accordance with section 6.5 of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979 and clause 162A of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Regulation 2000, to monitor compliance with the relevant standards of construction, Council’s development consent and the construction certificate.
Site Signage
25. A sign must be erected and maintained in a prominent position on the site for the duration of the works, which contains the following details:
· name, address, contractor licence number and telephone number of the principal contractor, including a telephone number at which the person may be contacted outside working hours, or owner-builder permit details (as applicable)
· name, address and telephone number of the Principal Certifying Authority,
· a statement stating that “unauthorised entry to the work site is prohibited”.
Restriction on Working Hours
26. Building, demolition and associated site works must be carried out in accordance with the following requirements:
Activity |
Permitted working hours |
All building, demolition and site work, including site deliveries (except as detailed below) |
· Monday to Friday - 7.00am to 5.00pm · Saturday - 8.00am to 5.00pm · Sunday & public holidays - No work permitted |
Excavating or sawing of rock, use of jack-hammers, pile-drivers, vibratory rollers/compactors or the like
|
· Monday to Friday - 8.00am to 5.00pm · Saturday - No work permitted · Sunday & public holidays - No work permitted |
An application to vary the abovementioned hours may be submitted to Council’s Manager Health, Building & Regulatory Services for consideration and approval to vary the specified hours may be granted in exceptional circumstances and for limited occasions (e.g. for public safety, traffic management or road safety reasons). Any applications are to be made on the standard application form and include payment of the relevant fees and supporting information. Applications must be made at least 10 days prior to the date of the proposed work and the prior written approval of Council must be obtained to vary the standard permitted working hours.
Removal of Asbestos Materials
27. Any work involving the demolition, storage or disposal of asbestos products and materials must be carried out in accordance with the following requirements:
· Occupational Health & Safety legislation and WorkCover NSW requirements
· Randwick City Council’s Asbestos Policy
· A WorkCover licensed demolition or asbestos removal contractor must undertake removal of more than 10m2 of bonded asbestos (or as otherwise specified by WorkCover or relevant legislation). Removal of friable asbestos material must only be undertaken by contractor that holds a current friable asbestos removal licence. A copy of the relevant licence must be provided to the Principal Certifying Authority.
· On sites involving the removal of asbestos, a sign must be clearly displayed in a prominent visible position at the front of the site, containing the words ‘DANGER ASBESTOS REMOVAL IN PROGRESS’ and include details of the licensed contractor.
· Asbestos waste must be stored, transported and disposed of in compliance with the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 and the Protection of the Environment Operations (Waste) Regulation 2005. Details of the landfill site (which must be lawfully able to receive asbestos materials) must be provided to the Principal Certifying Authority.
· A Clearance Certificate or Statement, prepared by a suitably qualified person (i.e. an occupational hygienist, licensed asbestos assessor or other competent person), must be provided to Council and the Principal certifying authority upon completion of the asbestos related works which confirms that the asbestos material have been removed appropriately and the relevant conditions of consent have been satisfied.
A copy of Council’s Asbestos Policy is available on Council’s web site at www.randwick.nsw.gov.au in the Building & Development Section or a copy can be obtained from Council’s Customer Service Centre.
Excavations, Back-filling & Retaining Walls
28. All excavations and backfilling associated with the erection or demolition of a building must be executed safely in accordance with appropriate professional standards and excavations must be properly guarded and supported to prevent them from being dangerous to life, property or buildings.
Retaining walls, shoring or piling must be provided to support land which is excavated in association with the erection or demolition of a building, to prevent the movement of soil and to support the adjacent land and buildings, if the soil conditions require it. Adequate provisions are also to be made for drainage.
Details of proposed retaining walls, shoring, piling or other measures are to be submitted to and approved by the Principal Certifying Authority.
Support of Adjoining Land
29. In accordance with section 4.17 (11) of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979 and clause 98 E of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Regulation 2000, it is a prescribed condition that the adjoining land and buildings located upon the adjoining land must be adequately supported at all times.
30. Prior to undertaking any demolition, excavation or building work in the following circumstances, a report must be obtained from a professional engineer which details the methods of support for the dwelling or associated structure on the adjoining land, to the satisfaction of the Principal Certifying Authority:
· when undertaking excavation or building work within the zone of influence of the footings of a dwelling or associated structure that is located on the adjoining land;
· when undertaking demolition work to a wall of a dwelling that is built to a common or shared boundary (e.g. semi-detached or terrace dwelling);
· when constructing a wall to a dwelling or associated structure that is located within 900mm of a dwelling located on the adjoining land;
· as may be required by the Principal Certifying Authority.
The demolition, excavation and building work and the provision of support to the dwelling or associated structure on the adjoining land, must also be carried out in accordance with the abovementioned report, to the satisfaction of the Principal Certifying Authority.
Sediment & Erosion Control
31. Sediment and erosion control measures, must be implemented throughout the site works in accordance with the manual for Managing Urban Stormwater – Soils and Construction, published by Landcom.
Details of the sediment and erosion control measures to be implemented on the site must be included in with the Construction Management Plan and be provided to the Principal Certifying Authority and Council. A copy must also be maintained on site and be made available to Council officers upon request.
Public Safety & Site Management
32. Public safety and convenience must be maintained at all times during demolition, excavation and construction works and the following requirements must be complied with:
a) Public access to the building site and materials must be restricted by existing boundary fencing or temporary site fencing having a minimum height of 1.5m, to Council’s satisfaction.
Temporary site fences are required to be constructed of cyclone wire fencing material and be structurally adequate, safe and constructed in a professional manner. The use of poor quality materials or steel reinforcement mesh as fencing is not permissible.
a) Building materials, sand, soil, waste materials, construction equipment or other articles must not be placed upon the footpath, roadway or nature strip at any time.
b) The road, footpath, vehicular crossing and nature strip must be maintained in a good, safe, clean condition and free from any excavations, obstructions, trip hazards, goods, materials, soils or debris at all times. Any damage caused to the road, footway, vehicular crossing, nature strip or any public place must be repaired immediately, to the satisfaction of Council.
c) All building and site activities (including storage or placement of materials or waste and concrete mixing/pouring/pumping activities) must not cause or be likely to cause ‘pollution’ of any waters, including any stormwater drainage systems, street gutters or roadways.
Note: It is an offence under the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 to cause or be likely to cause ‘pollution of waters’, which may result in significant penalties and fines.
d) Access gates and doorways within site fencing, hoardings and temporary site buildings or amenities must not open out into the road or footway.
e) Site fencing, building materials, bulk bins/waste containers and other articles must not be located upon the footpath, roadway or nature strip at any time without the prior written approval of the Council. Applications to place a waste container in a public place can be made to Council’s Health, Building and Regulatory Services department.
f) Adequate provisions must be made to ensure pedestrian safety and traffic flow during the site works and traffic control measures are to be implemented in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Roads and Traffic Manual “Traffic Control at Work Sites” (Version 4), to the satisfaction of Council.
g) A Road / Asset Opening Permit must be obtained from Council prior to carrying out any works within or upon a road, footpath, nature strip or in any public place, in accordance with section 138 of the Roads Act 1993 and all of the conditions and requirements contained in the Road / Asset Opening Permit must be complied with. Please contact Council’s Road/Asset Openings officer on 9093 6691 for further details.
h) Temporary toilet facilities are to be provided, at or in the vicinity of the work site throughout the course of demolition and construction, to the satisfaction of WorkCover NSW and the toilet facilities must be connected to a public sewer or other sewage management facility approved by Council.
Site Signage
33. A sign must be erected and maintained in a prominent position on the site for the duration of the works, which contains the following details:
· name, address, contractor licence number and telephone number of the principal contractor, including a telephone number at which the person may be contacted outside working hours, or owner-builder permit details (as applicable)
· name, address and telephone number of the Principal Certifying Authority,
· a statement stating that “unauthorised entry to the work site is prohibited”.
Survey Requirements
34. A Registered Surveyor’s check survey certificate or other suitable documentation must be obtained at the following stage/s of construction to demonstrate compliance with the approved setbacks, levels, layout and height of the building to the satisfaction of the Principal Certifying Authority (PCA):
· prior to construction (pouring of concrete) of the footings or first completed floor slab,
· upon completion of the building, prior to issuing an occupation certificate,
· as otherwise may be required by the PCA.
The survey documentation must be forwarded to the Principal Certifying Authority and a copy is to be forwarded to the Council, if the Council is not the Principal Certifying Authority for the development.
Building Encroachments
35. There must be no encroachment of any structures or building work onto Council’s road reserve, footway, nature strip or public place.
Tree Management
36. Whilst Council’s supports retention of the Camelia (T2) in the rear setback of the subject site, on the southern boundary, within the future side garden area as has been shown, it is an insignificant specimen, so may be removed as part of the rear courtyard and landscape works in this same area, should the applicant wish, subject to full implementation of the garden areas and planting that has been shown on the Ground Floor Plan, dwg DA03.
Pruning
37. Permission is granted for the minimal and selective pruning of ONLY those lower growing, lower order branches from the eastern aspect of the mature Gleditsia triacanthos ‘Sunburst’ (Honey Locust, T1) that is located in the rear setback of the subject site, along the southern boundary, only where needed in order to avoid damage to the tree; or; interference with works associated with the studio level above the existing garage as shown.
38. All pruning can only be undertaken by a Practising Arborist who holds a minimum of AQF Level III in Arboriculture, and to the requirements of Australian Standard AS 4373-2007 'Pruning of Amenity Trees,’ and NSW Work Cover Code of Practice for the Amenity Tree Industry (1998).
REQUIREMENTS PRIOR TO THE ISSUE OF AN OCCUPATION CERTIFICATE
The following conditions of consent must be complied with prior to the ‘Principal Certifying Authority’ issuing an ‘Occupation Certificate’.
Note: For the purpose of this consent, any reference to ‘occupation certificate’ shall also be taken to mean ‘interim occupation certificate’ unless otherwise stated.
These conditions have been applied to satisfy the relevant requirements of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979, Environmental Planning & Assessment Regulation 2000, Council’s development consent and to maintain reasonable levels of public health, safety and amenity.
Occupation Certificate Requirements
39. An Occupation Certificate must be obtained from the Principal Certifying Authority prior to any occupation of the building work encompassed in this development consent (including alterations and additions to existing buildings), in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979.
BASIX Requirements & Certification
40. In accordance with Clause 154B of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Regulation 2000, a Certifying Authority must not issue an Occupation Certificate for this development, unless it is satisfied that any relevant BASIX commitments and requirements have been satisfied.
Relevant documentary evidence of compliance with the BASIX commitments is to be forwarded to the Principal Certifying Authority and Council upon issuing an Occupation Certificate.
Council’s Infrastructure, Vehicular Crossings, street verge
41. The applicant must meet the full cost for Council or a Council approved contractor to repair/replace any damaged sections of Council's footpath, kerb & gutter, nature strip etc which are due to building works being carried out at the above site. This includes the removal of cement slurry from Council's footpath and roadway.
42. All external civil work to be carried out on Council property (including the installation and repair of roads, footpaths, vehicular crossings, kerb and guttering and drainage works), must be carried out in accordance with Council's "Crossings and Entrances – Contributions Policy” and “Residents’ Requests for Special Verge Crossings Policy” and the following requirements:
a) Details of the proposed civil works to be carried out on Council land must be submitted to Council in a Civil Works Application Form. Council will respond, typically within 4 weeks, with a letter of approval outlining conditions for working on Council land, associated fees and workmanship bonds. Council will also provide details of the approved works including specifications and construction details.
b) Works on Council land, must not commence until the written letter of approval has been obtained from Council and heavy construction works within the property are complete. The work must be carried out in accordance with the conditions of development consent, Council’s conditions for working on Council land, design details and payment of the fees and bonds outlined in the letter of approval.
c) The civil works must be completed in accordance with the above, prior to the issuing of an occupation certificate for the development, or as otherwise approved by Council in writing.
OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS
The following operational conditions must be complied with at all times, throughout the use and operation of the development.
These conditions have been applied to satisfy the relevant requirements of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979, Environmental Planning & Assessment Regulation 2000, Council’s development consent and to maintain reasonable levels of public health and environmental amenity.
External Lighting
43. External lighting to the premises must be designed and located so as to minimise light-spill beyond the property boundary or cause a public nuisance.
Waste Management
44. Adequate provisions are to be made within the premises for the storage and removal of waste and recyclable materials, to the satisfaction of Council.
Plant & Equipment – Noise Levels
45. The operation of all plant and equipment on the premises shall not give rise to an ‘offensive noise’ as defined in the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 and Regulations.
In this regard, the operation of the plant and equipment shall not give rise to an LAeq, 15 min sound pressure level at any affected premises that exceeds the background LA90, 15 min noise level, measured in the absence of the noise source/s under consideration by more than 5dB(A) in accordance with relevant NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA) Noise Control Guidelines.
Use of parking spaces
46. The car spaces within the development are for the exclusive use of the occupants of the building. The car spaces must not be leased to any person/company that is not an occupant of the building.
47. The studio above the garage must not be used for separate residential accommodation or as a separate residential occupancy at any time.
GENERAL ADVISORY NOTES
The following information is provided for your assistance to ensure compliance with the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979, Environmental Planning & Assessment Regulation 2000, or other relevant legislation and requirements. This information does not form part of the conditions of development consent pursuant to Section 4.17 of the Act.
A1 The requirements and provisions of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979 and Environmental Planning & Assessment Regulation 2000, must be fully complied with at all times.
Failure to comply with these requirements is an offence, which renders the responsible person liable to a maximum penalty of $1.1 million. Alternatively, Council may issue a penalty infringement notice (for up to $3,000) for each offence. Council may also issue notices and orders to demolish unauthorised or non-complying building work, or to comply with the requirements of Council’s development consent.
A2 In accordance with the requirements of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979, building works, including associated demolition and excavation works (as applicable) must not be commenced until:
§ A Construction Certificate has been obtained from an Accredited Certifier or Council,
§ An Accredited Certifier or Council has been appointed as the Principal Certifying Authority for the development,
§ Council and the Principal Certifying Authority have been given at least 2 days notice (in writing) prior to commencing any works.
A3 Council can issue your Construction Certificate and be your Principal Certifying Authority for the development, to undertake inspections and ensure compliance with the development consent and relevant building regulations. For further details contact Council on 9093 6944.
A4 This determination does not include an assessment of the proposed works under the Building Code of Australia (BCA) and other relevant Standards. All new building work (including alterations and additions) must comply with the BCA and relevant Standards and you are advised to liaise with your architect, engineer and building consultant prior to lodgement of your construction certificate.
A5 Any proposed amendments to the design and construction of the building may require a new development application or a section 4.55 amendment to the existing consent to be obtained from Council, before carrying out such works
A6 A Local Approval application must be submitted to and be approved by Council prior to commencing any of the following activities on a footpath, road, nature strip or in any public place:-
§ Install or erect any site fencing, hoardings or site structures
§ Operate a crane or hoist goods or materials over a footpath or road
§ Placement of a waste skip or any other container or article.
For further information please contact Council on 9093 6971.
A7 Specific details of the location of the building/s should be provided in the Construction Certificate to demonstrate that the proposed building work will not encroach onto the adjoining properties, Council’s road reserve or any public place.
A8 This consent does not authorise any trespass or encroachment upon any adjoining or supported land or building whether private or public. Where any underpinning, shoring, soil anchoring (temporary or permanent) or the like is proposed to be carried out upon any adjoining or supported land, the land owner or principal contractor must obtain:
§ the consent of the owners of such adjoining or supported land to trespass or encroach, or
§ an access order under the Access to Neighbouring Land Act 2000, or
§ an easement under section 88K of the Conveyancing Act 1919, or
§ an easement under section 40 of the Land & Environment Court Act 1979, as appropriate.
Section 177 of the Conveyancing Act 1919 creates a statutory duty of care in relation to support of land. Accordingly, a person has a duty of care not to do anything on or in relation to land being developed (the supporting land) that removes the support provided by the supporting land to any other adjoining land (the supported land).
A9 The finished ground levels external to the building must be consistent with the development consent and are not to be raised, other than for the provision of approved paving or the like on the ground
A10 An application must be submitted to an approved by Council prior to the installation and operation of any proposed greywater or wastewater treatment systems, in accordance with the Local Government Act 1993.
Greywater/Wastewater treatment systems must comply with the relevant requirements and guidelines produced by NSW Health, NSW Office of Environment and Heritage and other relevant regulatory requirements.
A11 Underground assets (e.g. pipes, cables etc.) may exist in the area that is subject to your application. In the interests of health and safety and in order to protect damage to third party assets please contact Dial before you dig at www.1100.com.au or telephone on 1100 before excavating or erecting structures (This is the law in NSW). If alterations are required to the configuration, size, form or design of the development upon contacting the Dial before You Dig service, an amendment to the development consent (or a new development application) may be necessary. Individuals owe asset owners a duty of care that must be observed when working in the vicinity of plant or assets. It is the individual’s responsibility to anticipate and request the nominal location of plant or assets on the relevant property via contacting the Dial before you dig service in advance of any construction or planning activities.
A12 The applicant is to advise Council in writing and/or photographs of any signs of existing damage to the Council roadway, footway, or verge prior to the commencement of any building/demolition works.
A13 Further information and details on Council's requirements for trees on development sites can be obtained from the recently adopted Tree Technical Manual, which can be downloaded from Council’s website at the following link, http://www.randwick.nsw.gov.au - Looking after our environment – Trees – Tree Management Technical Manual; which aims to achieve consistency of approach and compliance with appropriate standards and best practice guidelines.
Development Application Report No. D36/20
|
Subject: 305 & 307 Anzac Parade, Kingsford (DA/571/2019) |
|
|
|
|
Subject Site |
|
|
|
Submissions received
Ù North
|
|
Locality Plan |
The application is referred to the Randwick Local Planning Panel (RLPP) as the Development Application (DA) is accompanied by a Planning Agreement (PA).
The DA and planning agreement were publicly exhibited for a period of 14 days and 28 days respectively. Several submissions were received as part of the exhibition periods most of which were in support of the application. The PA was also referred to the Ordinary Council meeting on 23rd June 2020, where it was resolved to enter into the PA subject to determination by the RLPP.
The proposal seeks development consent for digital signage and surrounding vertical garden installed to a portion of the 6th storey of the southern side elevation of an existing 9 storey building at No. 305 Anzac Parade, Kingsford. The signage and vertical garden encroach over the neighbouring property at No. 307 Anzac Parade and the neighbour’s consent has been provided. The proposed signage measures 42.8sqm with the surrounding vertical garden separated into planter boxes and green wall representing 2.5 times the size of the signage across a visible part of the southern elevation which measures around 350sqm.
The proposed signage has an area greater than 20sqm, higher than 8m above ground level and within 250m of a classified road (Anzac Parade) and was referred to the RMS who have provided concurrence. The PA is submitted to satisfy the ‘Public benefit test’ required under Section 4 of the Transport Corridor Outdoor Advertising and Signage Guidelines - Assessing Development Applications under SEPP 64 (Guidelines) (DPE, Nov 2017). In addition to the public benefits test, the applicant is required to demonstrate consistency with the specific design criteria for transport corridors and the relevant DCP for the local area. A key criterion for assessment of the appropriateness of an advertising sign is whether the advertising sign will be consistent with the future desired character of an area. Other assessment considerations include whether surrounding land use is compatible with the type, form and scale of the advertising being proposed.
In regard to the public benefits test, it is acknowledged it contains the appropriate items that can be included in a PA having regard to Section 4 of the Guidelines.
In planning terms, however, it is considered that the benefits offered by the applicant in the PA does not make the development acceptable. The proposed location and size of the signage is inconsistent with the exhibited and desired location of signage in the Kingsford Centre where signage in the centre is predominantly located at ground and first floor level and mostly facing Anzac Parade. Signage located outside of these established and encouraged signage ‘zones’ does not rationalise or simplify existing advertising but rather will dominate existing and desired signage in the town centre resulting in visual clutter and complexity of signage along this transport corridor. The sign will be located at an elevation that predominantly contains residential uses above the 2 storey commercial land uses and will be seen as far back as 500m to the south from the intersection of Sturt Street and Anzac Parade adjacent to R3 zoned medium density residential zone.
The proposal includes green wall and planters which are encouraged and do in fact contribute to urban design at a local level however it is not considered this should be at the expense of an inappropriately located signage in a dominant position and bears no resemblance to the existing character of signage or that which is desired within the Kingsford Centre. Support of such signage has the real potential to result in an adverse precedent for signage in the Kingsford Centre.
Overall, the proposed size is inappropriately located and of considerable size that if installed will be at the expense of detracting from the land use planning and zone objectives. It will contribute to visual clutter of signage and will be inconsistent with the established and desired future character of signage in the area having regard to Part D2, and Part F2 of the RDCP for the Kingsford Centre and Outdoor Advertising and Signage. The signage will also be inconsistent with the K2K planning proposal, relevant clauses in SEPP 64 and the Guidelines for signage along a transport corridor.
Therefore, it is recommended that the DA and accompanying PA be refused by the RLPP on planning grounds being the negative planning outcomes arising from the circumstances of the development for outdoor advertising and it does not align with the existing or future vision for the Kingsford Centre.
2. Site Description and Locality
The subject site is known as 305 & 307 Anzac Parade and is legally described as Lot 100 DP 1156327 & Lot 1 DP 104068 respectively. The site at No. 305 Anzac Parade is 496m2, and 307 Anzac Parade is 354 m2. Both sites are regular in shape with 305 Anzac having a frontage of 10m and 307 Anzac has 7m frontage to Anzac Parade to the east.
The redevelopment of 305 Anzac Parade in 2007-2010 (DA/237/2007) contains a mixed-use development part rear 4 storey and part front 9 storey building with a central level 1 podium separating the two built forms. The front 9 storey building comprises a ground level shop fronting Anzac Parade with parking and services located behind to Houston Lane. The levels above contain a boarding house development, a level 1 central podium containing communal facilities and boarding rooms at the rear and levels above.
The site to the south at No. 307 Anzac Parade, as well as other buildings further south up to the Borrodale Road intersection with Anzac Parade, contain two storey buildings of older stock. These buildings appear to contain shop or commercial premises at both ground and first floor level.
The adjoining site to the north at 301-303 Anzac Parade contains a part-8 part-10 storey mixed use development with commercial at ground level fronting Anzac Parade and residential dwellings above. The first 8 storeys of this building are located close to the Anzac Parade frontage and substantial front setbacks for the 2 topmost storeys. The adjoining and subject building generally align with each other along the Anzac Parade frontage.
The Kingsford Centre is a traditional strip based centre containing a mix of two storey premises containing ground floor and first floor commercial/retail with some premises containing residential at the first floor. The multi-storey shop top housing and mixed uses in the centre contain commercial at ground level and residential above. The subject site and adjoining development to the north at 301-303 Anzac Parade as well as properties opposite from No. 438 to 458 Anzac Parade demonstrate the four storey wall frontage with larger front setbacks for higher levels.
Advertising in the Town Centre is predominately occurring across commercial uses at ground and first floor levels with signage mostly limited to ground level shopfronts, across awning fascia and at first floor level façade and parapets.
Figure 1: aerial view of subject site and surrounding area.
3. Relevant history
DA/467/2017: DA for a digital sign on the southern elevation of the existing building at No. 305 Anzac Parade, Kingsford was refused by Justice Pain of the Land and Environment Court on 1 March 2019. The refusal was based on the following grounds:
· The proposed development was not consistent with the objectives of SEPP 64 as it was not compatible with the desired future amenity and visual character of the area;
· The advertising structure should be subservient to the mixed-use nature of the locality and the sign was a significant intrusion into the higher residential zone because of its location;
· The proposed signage was not compatible with the desired future character as required by the objectives of the zone and outdoor advertising; and
· The high level, dominant position introduces visual clutter in a location where there is no signage.
The difference between the current and previous PA is that the current DA, whilst maintaining the sign in its previously refused location now contains a vertical green wall and planter partially surrounding the digital sign and the planning agreement contains additional public benefit provisions including increased monetary contribution from $15,000 to $20,000 per annum and additional public benefits such as:
· free Wi-Fi, and
· free Kingsford Business Council community advertising for 12 x 1-week periods.
4. Proposal
The proposal seeks development consent for installation and ongoing operation of a vertical living garden with integrated digital advertising sign (operating from 6am to 10pm daily) mounted to the existing southern wall of 305 Anzac Parade, Kingsford. The development includes structures that overhang the adjoining property, being Lot 1 DP 104068, commonly known as No. 307 Anzac Parade with depths of 300mm (Sign), 365mm (Breathing Wall) and 550mm (Planter Boxes). A photomontage provided at Figure 2 below. The Applicant has leasehold agreements with the respective property owners of Nos. 305 Anzac Parade and 307 Anzac Parade for period of consent sought being 15 years.
Figure 2: photomontage of the application (source: applicants SEE)
A draft PA accompanies the DA to satisfy the ‘public benefit test’ required under Section 4 of Transport Corridor Outdoor Advertising and Signage Guidelines - Assessing Development Applications Under SEPP 64 (Guidelines) (DPE, Nov 2017)) providing the following public benefits as per the submitted:
a. the procurement, installation and ongoing maintenance of the ‘Junglefy’ living green wall on the southern façade of 305 Anzac Parade, Kingsford as specified in plans submitted with the Development Application, and all associated costs including its’ removal and make-good;
b. the procurement, installation and on-going maintenance of a free community WI-FI service for the duration that the Digital Signage is in use, which must include signal coverage to, at least, the following key areas of pedestrian dwell time: Meeks Street Plaza and the Strachan Street Light Rail platform;
c. A total of $20,000, on an annual basis (Monetary Contribution); to be used for a Public Purpose means public benefits including to improve the traffic safety for drivers, pedestrians and cyclists within the Kingsford Centre; for new infill trees and planting along Anzac Parade; and the future development of Meeks Street Plaza; and
d. 12 campaigns of 1-week in duration per annum on the Digital Signage for the Kingsford Chamber of Commerce Inc to advertise and promote local businesses (only within the 2032 postcode) and activities.
5. Notification
The owners of adjoining and likely affected neighbouring properties were notified and advertised of the proposed development in accordance with the Randwick Comprehensive DCP 2013 for a period of 14 days from 30 October 2019 to 13 November 2019. The draft PA was notified and advertised in accordance with S7.5(1) of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979 (EP&A Act) which requires that a PA cannot be entered into, and cannot be amended or revoked, unless public notice has been given of the proposed agreement, amendment or revocation, and a copy of the proposed agreement, amendment or revocation has been available for inspection by the public for a period of not less than 28 days. The subject draft PA was publicly advertised and notified in the Southern Courier for 30 days, from 30 January to 2 March 2020
As a result of the above exhibition periods, Council received 9 submissions in support of the application with 1 objection concerning the heat load from the signage on internal premises at 307 Anzac Parade. Two (2) of the submissions in support also raised concern with the potential for light nuisance associated with signage operating between 10pm to 5am and requesting that the signage be removed after 15 years as proposed. It should be noted that the proposed signage is not seeking to operate between 10pm and 5am and SEPP 64 places a limit of 15 years consent for this type of signage.
The following submissions were received as a result of the notification process and addressed in the table below:
· 307 Anzac Parade;
· Emailed submission.
Issue |
Comment |
The proposed development will result in heat load onto No. 307 Anzac Parade |
The heat load from the use of the sign is identified as being managed by a fan. Additional ventilated solutions may require external supplemental Air Conditioning as provided in the specifications for the proposed digital sign.
Whilst the above methods, may reduce operating temperature and heat load it has the potential to result in adverse noise and vibration impacts on the both occupants of the existing boarding house and the neighbouring property to the south at No. 307 Anzac Parade. The application does not include an acoustic report addressing the potential noise or vibration nuisance on occupants of the boarding house at 305 Anzac Parade and on surrounding developments such as at No. 307 Anzac Parade. Notwithstanding, Council’s Environmental Health Officer recommends that should consent be granted conditions may be included to address and manage potential offensive sound and vibration impacts on surrounding development. |
Light nuisance potentially results in light nuisance on neighbouring properties. |
Council’s Environmental Health Officer has reviewed the applicant’s lighting impact assessment report and recommends that should consent be granted a condition be placed on the consent to validate compliance with AS 4282-2019 Control of the Obtrusive Effects of Outdoor Lighting – a requirement under SEPP 64 and NSW Transport Corridor Outdoor Advertising. |
6. Relevant Environment Planning Instruments
6.1. State Environmental Planning Policy (SEPP) No 64—Advertising and Signage
Relevant clauses in the SEPP include: 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 22, Schedule 1 (also identified as Table 2 in the Guidelines).
Clause 3 identifies the policy aims namely subclause 1a) and e) which states as follows:
3 (1) This Policy aims:
(a) to ensure that signage (including advertising):
(i) is compatible with the desired amenity and visual character of an area, and
(ii) provides effective communication in suitable locations, and
(iii) is of high-quality design and finish,
(e) to ensure that public benefits may be derived from advertising in and adjacent to transport corridors.
Clause 4 contains definitions including that the proposed sign is defined as a wall advertisement within an advertising structure located along a classified road – Anzac Parade and subject to SEPP 64 and Transport Corridor Outdoor Advertising and Signage Guidelines - Assessing Development Applications under SEPP 64 (Guidelines) (DPE, Nov 2017).
Clause 7 indicates that the SEPP prevails to the extent of any inconsistent with another EPI.
Clause 8 states a consent authority must not grant development consent to an application to display signage unless the consent authority is satisfied:
(a) that the signage is consistent with the objectives of this Policy as set out in clause 3 (1) (a), (shown above) and
(b) that the signage the subject of the application satisfies the assessment criteria specified in Schedule 1.
Clause 10 identifies that the proposed signage is not prohibited by its location in a particular zone or area and Clause 11 identifies that subject to the SEPP the proposal requires consent.
Under Clause 12 Council is the consent authority however, pursuant to Ministerial direction under Section 9.1 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (the Act) issued on 23 February 2018, taking effect on 1 March 2018, as planning agreements are identified as ‘sensitive development’ for which the developer has offered to enter into in the Development Application (DA), the Randwick Local Planning Panel (RLPP) is the consent authority.
Clause 13 sets out the matters for consideration and does not allow consent to an application to display an advertisement unless the advertising structure is consistent with the objectives of the SEPP set out in Clause 3(1)(a), the consent authority is satisfied that the proposal is acceptable in terms of its impacts and it satisfies any other relevant requirements of this policy. Subclause 13 (3) requires public benefit arrangements to be entered into in connection with the signage – see Appendix 2 and Section 8.1 ‘Public benefit’ in this report.
Clause 14 identifies the proposed sign is limited to a maximum period of 15 years or a lesser period specified by the consent authority.
Clauses 17, 18 & 22 of the SEPP, identify the proposed advertising sign is wall advertisement more than 20sqm in area (and <45sqm), situated more than 8m above ground level and within 250m of a classified road which requires RMS concurrence (See Appendix 1.1) and the consent authority is required to be satisfied that the advertising structure is consistent with Schedule 1 of the SEPP and the Guidelines in Transport Corridor Outdoor Advertising and Signage Guidelines - Assessing Development Applications Under SEPP 64 (Guidelines) (DPE, Nov 2017)). It is noted that criteria for assessment in Schedule 1 of SEPP 64 are expanded upon by Table 2 in the Guidelines as they relate to advertising in transport corridors, namely Design issues, Road safety, and Public benefits test for advertisement proposals. Appendix 2 contains an assessment against the relevant clauses, Schedule 1 and expanded upon Guidelines. Where relevant, where non-compliances warranting further discussion is contained in Section 8.1 of this report and other sections of this report.
6.2. Randwick Local Environmental Plan 2012 (LEP)
The site is zoned B2 Local Centre under Randwick Local Environmental Plan 2012 and the proposal for advertising signs is permissible with consent.
· To provide a range of retail, business, entertainment and community uses that serve the needs of people who live in, work in and visit the local area.
· To encourage employment opportunities in accessible locations.
· To maximise public transport patronage and encourage walking and cycling.
· To enable residential development that is well-integrated with, and supports the primary business function of, the zone.
· To facilitate a high standard of urban design and pedestrian amenity that contributes to achieving a sense of place for the local community.
· To minimise the impact of development and protect the amenity of residents in the zone and in the adjoining and nearby residential zones.
· To facilitate a safe public domain.
The proposal is inconsistent with the specific objectives of the zone in that the proposed activity and built form does not contribute to a high standard of urban design in the Kingsford Local Centre as the location and size of the signage is inconsistent with the mixed use and land use character in the Kingsford Local Centre. The proposal is located in a part of the site that is reserved for residential uses and will not protect the amenity of residents in the zone resulting in adverse visual impact on residents, pedestrians and potential acoustic impacts on occupants within the existing boarding house. The proposed development will not be consistent with the existing and desired streetscape character and the proposed digital signage will set an undesirable precedent within the Kingsford Centre.
Overall, the proposed signage is not suitable for the site and will be incompatible with the existing and desired future land use and character of the Kingsford Centre.
Draft K2K Panning Proposal
7. Development control plans and policies
7.1. Randwick Comprehensive DCP 2013
The DCP provisions are structured into two components: objectives and controls. The objectives provide the framework for assessment under each requirement and outline key outcomes that a development is expected to achieve. The controls contain both numerical standards and qualitative provisions. Any proposed variations from the controls may be considered only where the applicant successfully demonstrates that an alternative solution could result in a more desirable planning and urban design outcome.
· Part B4 - Landscaping and Biodiversity
· Part D2 - Kingsford Centre
· Part F2 – Outdoor advertising and signage.
The relevant provisions of the DCP are addressed in Appendix 2.
8. Environmental Assessment
The site has been inspected and the application has been assessed having regard to Section 4.15 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979, as amended.
Section 4.15 ‘Matters for Consideration’ |
Comments |
Section 4.15 (1)(a)(i) – Provisions of any environmental planning instrument |
See discussion in sections 6 & 7 and key issues below.
|
Section 4.15(1)(a)(ii) – Provisions of any draft environmental planning instrument |
The proposal is assessed as being inconsistent with the draft environmental planning instrument, being the K2K Planning Proposal. |
Section 4.15(1)(a)(iii) – Provisions of any development control plan |
The proposal does not satisfy the objectives and controls of the Randwick Comprehensive DCP 2013 in regard to Part D2 Kingsford Centre and F2 Outdoor advertising and signage. See relevant tables in Appendix 2 and the discussion in key issues below
|
Section 4.15(1)(a)(iiia) – Provisions of any Planning Agreement or draft Planning Agreement |
The Draft planning Agreement is considered to contain the appropriate elements required in a PA pursuant to Section 4 of the Guidelines. However, it fails on planning grounds and is therefore not an appropriate to enter into the planning agreement. |
Section 4.15(1)(a)(iv) – Provisions of the regulations |
The relevant clauses of the Regulations have been satisfied. |
Section 4.15(1)(b) – The likely impacts of the development, including environmental impacts on the natural and built environment and social and economic impacts in the locality |
The environmental impacts of the proposed development on the natural and built environment have been addressed in this report.
The proposed development is inconsistent with the dominant character in the locality.
The proposal will result in detrimental social or economic impacts on the locality. |
Section 4.15(1)(c) – The suitability of the site for the development |
The site does not have sufficient area to accommodate the proposed land use and associated structures. Therefore, the site is considered unsuitable for the proposed development. |
Section 4.15(1)(d) – Any submissions made in accordance with the EP&A Act or EP&A Regulation
|
The issues raised in the submissions have been addressed in this report. |
Section 4.15(1)(e) – The public interest |
The proposal does not promote the objectives of the zone and results in significant adverse environmental impacts on the locality. Accordingly, the proposal is not considered to be in the public interest. |
8.1. Discussion of key issues
State Environmental Planning Policy No 64—Advertising and Signage & Transport Corridor Outdoor Advertising and Signage Guidelines - Assessing Development Applications Under SEPP 64.
A key criterion for assessment of the appropriateness of an advertising sign is whether the advertising sign will be consistent with the existing and desired character of an area. The proposed DA seeks signage that is predominately the same as that which was refused in the previous application except that it now contains a green wall/planter boxes that partially surround the signage and added public benefits. The following is a discussion of these key aspects of the proposed signage and its impact on the character of the area and the public benefits provided for in the draft PA.
· Character of the area
As provided for in the Court case of DA/467/2017, Commissioner Pain concurred with Council’s expert witness in an assessment of the character of the Kingsford Centre reflecting a dual nature as both a commercial and retail centre up to two storeys in height with shop top development fronting Anzac Parade and taller residential apartment blocks set back and behind this strip. The Assessment Officer’s view is that the character has not changed from that observed. The Commissioner also agreed with Council’s expert witness that advertising should be subservient to the mixed-use nature of the locality. That the proposal represents a significant intrusion into the higher residential zone. It would sit well above the existing large amount of signage (as defined in SEPP 64), consisting of building identification, business identification and advertisement signage in the two-storey commercial and retail strip along Anzac Parade. The proposed location of the site has not changed, and its size and location intrude above the 2 storey strip of shops in the area that remains inconsistent with the predominant location of signage in the area, which will therefore dominate other signage.
The proposed DA incorporates a green wall and planters across parts of the southern elevation and will to a certain extent soften the visual impacts of the signage, however this does not mean that the sign will now be compatible with the character of the current land use of the Centre.
With regards to the future character of the area, direction is provided for by the K2K planning proposal, which is currently with the DPIE waiting for gazettal, and operating as a draft EPI. The status of the draft EPI is different to the K2K planning strategy in place at the time of the previous DA and now contains greater statutory weight. Council’s Strategic Planning section has provided assessment comments to which the assessment officer concurs that that the proposed signage is incompatible with the desired future character of the area which is envisaged as continuation of the centre as a mixed commercial and retail zone with residential uses located above (DA/467/2017). The proposed advertising structure is incompatible with the envisaged commercial character at ground and first floor level in the town centre and is therefore inconsistent with the future desired character of the area.
It is further noted, that by proposing a sign and green wall that encroaches over the side boundary of the adjoining site to the south at No. 307 Anzac Parade in a centre which contains boundary to boundary development at side boundaries will hinder amalgamation and redevelopment of sites to the south of the adjoining lot and ultimately limit the orderly development of land envisaged as the future desired character of the Kingsford Centre.
· Public benefit (Draft Planning Agreement – PA)
Clause 18 of SEPP 64 covering signage with an area between 20sqm and 45sqm, located more than 8m above ground level must not be granted consent unless arrangements consistent with the Section 4 of the Guidelines (Transport Corridor Outdoor Advertising and Signage Guidelines - Assessing Development Applications Under SEPP 64 (DPE, Nov 2017)) have been entered into for the provision of the public benefits to be provided in connection with the signage (display of the advertisement):
The draft PA has been prepared in accordance with the EP&A Act and meets the procedures of Council’s Planning Agreement Policy. The draft PA has been provided in satisfaction of the ‘public benefit test’ as follows:
a. the procurement, installation and ongoing maintenance of the ‘Junglefy’ living green wall on the southern façade of 305 Anzac Parade, Kingsford as specified in plans submitted with the Development Application, and all associated costs including its’ removal and make-good;
b. the procurement, installation and on-going maintenance of a free community WI-FI service for the duration that the Digital Signage is in use, which must include signal coverage to, at least, the following key areas of pedestrian dwell time: Meeks Street Plaza and the Strachan Street Light Rail platform;
c. A total of $20,000, on an annual basis (Monetary Contribution); to be used for a Public Purpose means public benefits including to improve the traffic safety for drivers, pedestrians and cyclists within the Kingsford Centre; for new infill trees and planting along Anzac Parade; and the future development of Meeks Street Plaza; and
d. 12 campaigns of 1-week in duration per annum on the Digital Signage for the Kingsford Chamber of Commerce Inc to advertise and promote local businesses (only within the 2032 postcode) and activities.
The draft PA was presented at the Ordinary Council Meeting on 23rd June 2020 on the basis that it represented a matter of public interest with the following recommendation:
That Council agree to enter into the Planning Agreement relating to the proposed development under DA/571/2019 at 305 & 307 Anzac Parade, Kingsford, pursuant to Section 7.4 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 subject to a consent being issued by the Randwick Local Planning Panel.
The resolution of the OCM is as follows:
RESOLUTION: (Stavrinos/Roberts) that Council agree to enter into the Planning Agreement relating to the proposed development under DA/571/2019 at 305 & 307 Anzac Parade, Kingsford, pursuant to Section 7.4 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 subject to a consent being issued by the Randwick Local Planning Panel.
The draft PA meets the Council’s Planning Agreement Policy procedures and Section 4 of the Guideline as to items considered an ‘appropriate’ public benefit. Notwithstanding, as the PA accompanies a DA, it is ultimately a decision for the RLPP as to whether Council enters into the PA. In this respect, a key principle that guides use of PA’s is that a development that is unacceptable on planning grounds will not be permitted because of planning benefits offered by developers that do not make the development acceptable in planning terms (Council’s Planning Agreements Policy – Sept 2007).
In this respect, and as assessed throughout this report, on planning grounds the proposed size and location of the signage and green wall is considered unacceptable in that the proposed sign does not meet the specific design criteria for signage in a transport corridor as set out in Schedule 1 of SEPP 64 and Table 2 of the Guidelines. The location and size of the signage will dominate the streetscape, be inconsistent with the specific residential uses envisaged in this higher part of the site within the Kingsford Centre which is also well above the predominant location of signage in the Centre that is located at ground and first floor level in the centre. The proposed signage adds to the visual clutter and complexity of signage and will ultimately degrade the existing and desired character of the Kingsford Centre – a key design criteria for signage along a transport corridor.
In addition, this application also represents an undesirable precedent for similar applications for signage to other buildings in the Kingsford Centre containing blank walls on the same side of Anzac Parade as well as to other Local Centres in the wider Randwick LGA, although these would be subject to separate assessment and concurrence by the RMS.
Therefore, it is recommended that the PA not be entered into as the public benefits do not make the development acceptable on planning terms having regard to the relevant clauses of SEPP 64 and the Guidelines having regard to the specific design criteria for signage along this transport corridor.
9. Conclusion
A consideration of the proposal as submitted including additional information concludes that the proposed digital sign does not meet the relevant objectives of the B2 Local Centre as the proposal does not contribute to a high standard of urban design in the Kingsford Centre due to the location and size at such at 6th storey will dominate the mixed use and land use character in the Kingsford Centre where commercial development is predominately located at ground and first floor level and at a level reserved for residential development. The proposed development also encroaches over the adjoining lot to the south at No. 307 Anzac Parade and is incompatible and will detract from the existing and desired streetscape character and has the potential to set an undesirable precedent within the Kingsford Centre.
The proposal should be refused for the following reasons:
· The proposal is inconsistent with the relevant objectives contained within the RLEP 2012 and the relevant requirements of the RDCP 2013 having regard to Part F2 Outdoor Advertising.
· The proposal is inconsistent with the specific objectives of the B2 zone in that the proposed signage is inconsistent with the predominant location of outdoor advertising in the area at ground and first floor level parapets at a height line where residential uses are located.
· The scale and design of the proposal is considered to dominate the southern elevation of an existing building.
· The signage on southern elevation is unsuitable for the site as it encroaches onto the adjoining southern lot, which will hinder the amalgamation and redevelopment potential of the southern adjoining lots or isolate the adjoining lot to the south at 307 Anzac Parade and will be incompatible with the desired future character of the area.
· The development does not enhance the visual quality of the public domain/streetscape directing attention away from the view and vista along the Anzac Parade corridor.
· The proposed development will negatively impact and be incompatible with the residential component of the existing and envisaged uses within the Kingsford Town Centre and is therefore inconsistent with Schedule 1 of SEPP 64 and S2.3.2 Sign placement in transport corridors in urban areas of Transport Corridor Outdoor Advertising and Signage Guidelines.
· The proposed development will result in visual clutter as it will dominate the viewing rights of adjacent advertisers, which are predominately located at ground and first floor levels along the Anzac Parade and therefore is inconsistent with Schedule 1 of SEPP 64 and S2.4 Sign clutter controls of Transport Corridor Outdoor Advertising and Signage Guidelines.
· The proposal is inconsistent with the draft environmental planning instrument, being the K2K Planning Proposal.
Appendix 1: Referrals
1. External referral comments:
1.1. RMS
1.2. Sydney Airports Corporation Limited (SACL)
The height of the signage is more than 15.24m above ground level and the SACL have provided concurrence to the proposed height subject to conditions.
2. Internal referral comments:
2.1. Strategic Planning
Background:
This memo considers the …..proposal in the context of the Kensington and Kingsford Town Centre Planning Strategy (The Strategy) and working draft DCP (draft DCP). These documents set out the vision, strategies and planning controls to guide future growth of the two town centres, including the design of new development and improvements to the public domain.
The subject proposal is for digital third-party advertising signage on the southern external wall of the existing building at 305 Anzac Parade, Kingsford in conjunction with a vertical green ‘ living wall’. The proposed signage is to be located approximately 14.9m from the road clearance (mid building), has display dimensions of 12.54m x 3.39m, and a wall protrusion encroaching upon the neighbouring property boundary at 307 Anzac Parade.
It is noted that this is the second proposal for illuminated third party signage at this location, with the previous development application (DA/467/2017) for an advertising sign determined by way of a Class 1 appeal (deemed refusal) and dismissed by Justice Pain (decision date 1 March 2019) on the grounds of incompatibility with the desired future character of the Kingsford town centre.
Kensington and Kingsford Town Centre Planning Review
K2K Planning Strategy
The Kensington and Kingsford Town Centre Planning Review was undertaken over 2015-2016 to update the planning framework, address population growth projections, improve the quality of building design and the public realm, encourage economic activity and accommodate the Sydney City to South East Light Rail infrastructure along Anzac Parade.
The subsequent Kensington and Kingsford Town Centre Planning Strategy (the Strategy) contains objectives and implementation actions to facilitate high quality development and address existing public domain deficiencies, including visual clutter stemming from excessive and inappropriately designed and located signage. The Strategy proposes new built form controls to facilitate redevelopment across both centres, in conjunction with additional greening and landscaping and public domain interventions to enhance and create a sense of place that is attractive and free from clutter.
Strategies and implementation actions relevant to the development proposal are summarised as follows:
8.3 Public Domain- Strategy (1)
Minimise visual clutter and create legible streetscapes.
Action (c)
Strengthen DCP controls relating to signage within the town centres by requiring that:
· New works involve the removal of unsympathetic signage where possible
· All new signage be set below the street awning or awning fascia; and
· A signage plan is to be submitted as part of the redevelopment of sites.
K2K Planning Proposal
The K2K Planning Proposal (PP) has now been submitted to the Department of Planning, Industry and Environment (DPIE) for finalisation/gazettal following its exhibition in August/September 2019. The PP endorsed by Council in December 2019, is an outcome of the Planning Strategy and proposes amendments to the Randwick LEP 2012 building height and FSR provisions across the Kensington and Kingsford town centres to facilitate redevelopment. In relation to the subject site and properties immediately south along the western side of Anzac Parade, the Planning Proposal proposes an increase in height from 24m to 31m (7 to 9 storeys) and an increase in FSR from 3:1 to 4:1.
Draft DCP – Kensington and Kingsford Town Centres
The draft DCP for the Kensington and Kingsford town centres is currently being prepared and supplements the proposed RLEP 2012 provisions for the centres with detailed planning controls to guide the design and assessment of new development. The draft DCP translates the key directions and implementation actions of the Planning Strategy with planning controls that:
· Facilitate the uplift of development sites to accommodate additional growth and ensure design excellence
· Provide for the appropriate location for signage below the street awning or facia to minimise visual clutter
· Support the integration of green walls and green roofs into the design of new buildings to enhance the environmental sustainability and amenity of the centres
· Encourage green walls and public art on blank walls to add visual interest to the town centres and minimise the visual bulk of buildings.
Submission
The proponent states that the application should be supported on the following grounds:
· The proposed signage and vertical living wall are permissible uses in the B2 Local Centres zone and would be compatible with the desired future character of Kingsford town centre as having a high standard of urban design and sense of place.
· The vertical green wall would contribute to the environmental and visual amenity of Kingsford town centre by contribution of vertical green space in an area with little street tree planting.
· The proposed signage is to be self-funded through the advertising component.
· The proposal would not preclude future redevelopment of the neighbouring building (307 Anzac Parade) due to a temporary easement and time limited nature of the development consent being sought. Furthermore it is claimed that sites immediately south of the proposal are unlikely to be redeveloped in the near future regardless, due to their high land prices, the relatively low uplift from the rezoning, fragmented ownership patterns, lengthy leases, and soil and groundwater conditions which make multi-level excavations for basements expensive and cost prohibitive.
Discussion
Signage is an important feature in town centres and if well designed and well positioned can reinforce the character of buildings, promote businesses, and contribute to streetscape legibility and vitality. Conversely, poorly designed signage can contribute to visual clutter, dominate built form and impact adversely upon amenity of pedestrians and motorists.
The Strategy is clear that the desired future character for Kingsford town centre is a coherent public realm that is free from clutter and with a high level of visual and pedestrian amenity. As aforementioned, the Strategy specifically identifies appropriate locations for signage as being below the street awning and the awning fascia. It is inherently clear that mid-building signage is not a desirable outcome for the town centre.
The proposal accordingly is not considered to align with the planned future vision for the Kingsford town centre for the following reasons:
· The proposal’s mid-building elevation, use of LED technology and excessive size and proportions would add a visually prominent and detracting element to the public domain which is inconsistent with the existing character of the Kingsford town centre. As highlighted previously, most of the existing signage in Kingsford is associated with local businesses and located below the awning or on the awning fascia with very little elevated signage and no digital signs.
· The proposed signage is incongruent with the desired future character of the Kingsford town centre, which is reflected in the Strategy’s vision for an attractive, coherent and welcoming public realm that is free from clutter (see Section 8.3 Public Domain of the Strategy). Further, the Strategy’s implementation actions for signage (which are currently being formulated) stipulate that DCP controls be prepared to limit signage to the awning or on the awning fascia. The positioning of signage on the mid-level of the building elevation is not a desirable outcome for the Kingsford town centre and was not contemplated in the K2K Strategy.
· The proposal would create a precedent for similar forms of signage and pre-empt the future character of Kingsford town centre prior to the exhibition and adoption of DCP controls.
· While the vertical living wall is consistent with the desire for Kingsford town centre to have a greener, more sustainable focus, the provision of such would not mitigate or negate the adverse visual impacts the proposed signage would have upon the public realm. It also further raises issues about long term maintenance given its positioning on the southern side elevation of the building and encroachment onto the neighbouring property. Notably the DCP controls currently being prepared will give further clarity about the treatment of blank walls so that design, environmental and maintenance issues are considered holistically. The draft DCP will also strengthen requirements for landscaping to be designed and integrated as part of new development proposals.
· The encroachment of the sign onto the adjoining property boundary at 307 Anzac Parade has the potential to hinder amalgamation and redevelopment of sites to the south of proposal. The built form/urban design study underpinning the Strategy and Planning Proposal carefully considered existing site characteristics (such as contributory facades), locational context, environmental constraints, the relationship with surrounding development and dwelling yield in its modelling of built form controls for the sites. The resulting built form controls have been rigorously tested and are appropriate to support and facilitate the redevelopment of the town centre. Anecdotal observations on market conditions and feasibility are not considered relevant in this regard.
Conclusion:
The proposed mid building third party advertising structure does not align with the vision for the revitalisation of the Kingsford town centre that is clearly articulated in the Planning Strategy, Planning Proposal and draft DCP currently being prepared. The proposed signage would exacerbate existing visual clutter issues and create a precedent for similar advertising structures in the town centre. While the proposed vertical green wall may contribute to landscaping as contemplated in Council’s Strategy, it would not mitigate the adverse visual amenity impacts of the proposed illuminated signage on the public realm and compromise future development on the adjoining land to the south. On this basis, the proposal is not considered to be consistent with the prevailing and planned desired future character of the Kingsford town centre.
2.2. Development Engineer
An application has been received for the installation of illuminated digital advertising signage and a ‘green wall’ at the above site.
This report is based on the following plans and documentation:
· Architectural Plans by Arcadis, dwg’s DA.01-04, issue 2, 29/9/19;
· Statement of Environmental Effects by ABC Planning, dated October 2019;
· Covering letter by Junglefy, undated, but stamped by Council 25/10/19;
· Structural Design Statement by Diagnostic & Remedial Engineering, dated 05/09/16;
· Planting Strategy by Junglefy, v1.0, dated 13/09/19;
· Vertical Garden Plan of Management by Junglefy, dated 12/09/19.
Landscape Comments
The only component of this application that requires assessment is the ‘green wall’ proposed over the full height and width of the southern face of the existing building, with the submitted design and reports nominating a total of 24 species for use, to be installed over 4 different zones, that have been strategically selected due to their suitability to the prevailing climatic conditions, including wind exposure and solar access.
While vertical growth via the use of vines (which typically form part of these systems) will not be possible here due to a lack of solar access, a combination of cascading type plants and breathing walls will be provided to create a visually appealing outcome, rather than a minimal strategy, or monoculture.
The submission details that an ‘intelligent’ irrigation system with Bluetooth connection will be used to retrieve weather data and forecasts, and along with soil moisture sensors will ensure accurate irrigation management, with drainage to be collected in drip trays which will then be directed to the sewer.
The green wall will also be ventilated via an electric axial impeller, to ensure uniform air flow across all plants and growing medium, which both increases the rate of carbon dioxide draw down, and the amount of air that can be filtered and cooled by the units.
Junglefy are an industry leader regarding green walls, with the conditions of consent recommended in their Plan of Management associated with its implementation/installation, maintenance and then removal/de-commissioning, having been formally incorporated into this report.
Engineering certification confirms that attaching the proposed signage to the face of the building will have no effect on structural integrity; however, this same certification cannot be found for the planter boxes, with conditions requiring that this be formally provided.
The benefits of green walls are well-known, including reducing heating and cooling costs, visual and acoustic screening, assisting with air pollution, as well as visual appeal, and while it is understood that the signage component of this application may not be supported due to several non-compliances with Council’s strategic directives for this type of development in the Kensington to Kingsford Commercial Centre (K2K); when this green wall is assessed purely on its merits, (also noting that the southern neighbours have consented to the resulting encroachment of their air space, refer D03697624 & D03697623), this initiative can be supported, as it aligns with Council’s vision of using these systems to soften the built forms, and on this basis, relevant conditions have been provided.
2.3. Environmental Health
Proposed Development:
Installation and option of digital signage and vertical garden on southern face of existing building 305 Anzac Parade, Kingsford, with a Voluntary Planning Agreement proposing a $20,000 p.a contribution to Randwick Council, on-going maintenance of vertical garden, free community Wi-Fi within vicinity of the site and provision of signage media campaigns to promote local businesses.
Environmental Health Comments:
Vertical Garden Plan of Management
A vertical garden plan of management (VGPOM) was submitted to Council dated 12 September 2019 (reference: V1.0) which outlines the Junglefy infrastructure system design including the expected environmental benefits and performance. Proposed conditions have been incorporated and referenced from the City of Sydney ‘Green roofs and walls policy’ adopted by City of Sydney in April 2014.
Lighting impact assessment
A lighting impact assessment was submitted to Council and prepared by Electrolight Australia Pty Ltd dated 16 September 2019. The objective of the assessment is to report on compliance with the State Environmental Planning Policy No. 64 – Advertising and Signage (SEPP 64), NSW Transport Corridor Outdoor Advertising and Signage Guidelines, and AS4282-2019 Control of the Obtrusive Effects of Outdoor Lighting.
Based on an assessment of the surrounding environment, the proposed signage is located within Environmental Zone A4 under AS4282, therefore the maximum nighttime luminance is 350 cd/m2.
It is intended that the digital signage be illuminated from 6am until 10pm, a condition shall be placed on the consent to validate compliance with AS 4282-2019 Control of the obtrusive effects of outdoor lighting and lighting impact assessment.
Noise and vibration
An acoustic report has not been submitted in relation to the potential noise and vibration created by the illuminated digital sign between the hours of 6am – 10pm, to ensure there is no impact to the existing amenity of the surrounding environment, a condition will be placed on the consent should the issue of offensive noise or vibration nuisance arise.
Appendix 2: Compliance Tables
1. State Environmental Planning Policy No. 64 – Advertising and Signage
1.1 Schedule 1:
Relevant Clause |
Comment |
1. Character of the area Is the proposal compatible with the existing or desired future character of the area or locality in which it is proposed to be located?
|
See key issues section of this report. The proposed signage is of a size and location that is inconsistent with the existing and desired future amenity and visual character of the area. The existing character of the area shows predominately 2 storey building facades lining Anzac Parade, and the proposed sign sitting above these facades will be incompatible with the location of signage in the surrounding area which is largely limited to ground and first floor levels across the front facades of buildings. Does not comply see key issues section. |
Is the proposal consistent with a particular theme for outdoor advertising in the area or locality?
|
There is theme for signage within the Kingsford business area for general awning and shopfront signage over ground and first floor level. The proposed signage will set a poor precedent for outdoor advertising in the surrounding area. Does not comply see key issues section |
2. Special areas
Does the proposal detract from the amenity or visual quality of any environmentally sensitive areas, heritage areas, natural or other conservation areas, open space areas, waterways, rural landscapes or residential areas? |
The site is not within an environmentally sensitive area. Not applicable. |
3. Views and vistas Does the proposal obscure or compromise important views? |
The view and vista of the corridor along Anzac Parade will be interrupted by the proposed sign as viewed from various locations - the most notable of which is at the apex to the curving road leading towards the intersections of Anzac Parade and Borrodale Road and the various pedestrian footpaths on both sides of Anzac Parade. The proposed sign will be very noticeable from several locations at street level and will be the only advertisement at that level in a dominant position (DA/467/2017). Whilst the green wall softens the appearance of the sign, it cannot lessen the compromising location and size of the sign as it relates to the streetscape along Anzac Parade. Does not comply. |
Does the proposal dominate the skyline and reduce the quality of vistas? |
The proposed sign detracts from the vista along Anzac Parade in a north bound direction by dominating the predominately two storey facades lining Anzac Parade and directing attention away from the corridor of facades along Anzac Parade. The proposed sign will also be visible from around 500m south of the site along Anzac Parade. Does not comply |
Does the proposal respect the viewing rights of other advertisers? |
No, the proposal will adversely affect the viewing rights of other advertisers as it is of a considerable size and at a considerable height that is significantly more prominent to the size and location of signs in the vicinity and within the Kingsford Centre. The proposed advertising structure will also be viewable around 550m from the south on Anzac Parade. Does not comply. |
4. Streetscape, setting or landscape
Are the scale, proportion and form of the proposal appropriate for the streetscape, setting or landscape?
|
The proposed advertising structure is located well above the predominantly ground and first floor level signage along this part of the Kingsford Centre and represents a significant intrusion into the higher residential zone located above. The proposed advertising structure results in a prominent or obtrusive presence along Anzac Parade which as noted earlier is viewable for a considerable distance along Anzac Parade. Does not comply. |
Does the proposal contribute to the visual interest of the streetscape, setting or landscape? |
The proposed advertising structure is partially surrounded by a green wall which introduces visual interest into streetscape landscaping, Collectively, the proposed advertising structure will not contribute to visual interest of the streetscape as the height and size of the signage will dominate the streetscape setting in the business zone, introducing visual clutter in a part of the site that is inconsistent with the dominant location of signage in the area (limited to ground level and first floor level commercial premises). The draft PA includes provisions for the green wall’s procurement, installation and ongoing maintenance including its removal and make-good after a 15-year consent limited by SEPP 64. Should the green wall fail, the SEE makes provisions for turning off the sign. Partial compliance. |
Does the proposal reduce clutter by rationalising and simplifying existing advertising? (aligns with S2.4 of the guidelines) |
The high level, dominant position introduces visual clutter in a location where there is no signage as viewed by pedestrians and north bound vehicular traffic on Anzac Parade. Does not comply. |
Does the proposal screen unsightliness? |
The proposed green wall will to an extent screen unsightliness of the existing untreated southern elevation alongside No. 307 Anzac Parade. |
Does the proposal protrude above buildings, structures or tree canopies in the area or locality? |
Yes. |
5. Site and building Is the proposal compatible with the scale, proportion and other characteristics of the site or building, or both, on which the proposed signage is to be located? (aligns with S2.5.1 b) general criteria in the guidelines) |
The area occupied by the signage across the southern elevation takes up around 12% of the viewable parts of the southern elevation. The proposed signage is located on the side elevation of a building encroaches onto an adjoining site and is incompatible with the zero-lot alignment at side boundaries which is characteristic of existing and future development in the Kingsford Centre. The signage as noted in the earlier Court proceedings should be subservient to the mixed-use nature of the locality however the sign remains a significant intrusion into the higher residential zone because of its location. Does not comply. See below: Section 1.2: S2.5.2 Wall Advertisements |
Does the proposal respect important features of the site or building, or both? (aligns with S2.5.1 c) general criteria in the guidelines) |
The proposed sign does not respect the features of the site or building in that it is not within the boundaries of the building bur rather encroaches over the side boundary of the adjoining site which is inconsistent with the zero lot alignment afforded for development of the adjoining lot and lots further south of the site. Partial compliance. |
Does the proposal show innovation and imagination in its relationship to the site or building, or both? (aligns with S2.5.1 a) general criteria in the guidelines) |
The proposed signage and green wall represent a level of innovation. However as previously noted this is not sustainable in that it will be inconsistent with the characteristics of buildings in the area which contain boundary to boundary development at the sides that hinder amalgamation and redevelopment of adjoining sites to the south that are envisaged for the surrounding town centre. It is clearly not co-located with other signage in the Kingsford Centre. Partial compliance. |
Associated devices and logos with advertisements and advertising structures Have any safety devices, platforms, lighting devices or logos been designed as an integral part of the signage or structure on which it is to be displayed? |
Not applicable. |
6. Illumination Would illumination result in unacceptable glare?
|
The application includes a report indicating that illumination from the signage will not result in any unacceptable glare. Should approval be granted suitable conditions may be included in order to ensure on-going compliance with relevant Australian Standards. |
Would illumination affect safety for pedestrians, vehicles or aircraft? |
See comment above. |
Would illumination detract from the amenity of any residence or other form of accommodation? |
The proposal contains a report indicating that it will not detract from the amenity of any residence or other form of accommodation. It is unclear whether the application has surveyed all residential premises in the vicinity of the site to determine if the signage would not detract from the amenity of any residence or other form of accommodation. It is also noted that an acoustic report was not submitted and therefore any acoustic impacts to residents is not known. The proposed advertising structure encroaching onto 307 Anzac Parade and in close proximity to southern adjoining properties has the potential to adversely impact the amenity of residential premises on same and similar horizontal plane if amalgamation and redevelopment of the adjoining sites were able to be developed. Whilst the draft planning agreement builds in a lesser period for the proposed signage should redevelopment of the adjoining land occur, development of the adjoining lot is unlikely to occur given the advertising structure encroaches over the adjoining land at No. 307 Anzac Parade and at the very least would isolate the orderly development of this site should those further south be amalgamated and developed. |
Can the intensity of the illumination be adjusted, if necessary? |
Yes, based on the submitted documentation. |
Is the illumination subject to a curfew? |
Yes |
7. Safety
Would the proposal reduce the safety for any public road? |
RMS has provided concurrence and recommended appropriate conditions should the proposal be recommended for approval. |
Would the proposal reduce the safety for pedestrians or bicyclists? |
|
Would the proposal reduce the safety for pedestrians, particularly children, by obscuring sightlines from public areas? |
1.2 Transport Corridor Outdoor Advertising and Signage Guidelines -
The following contains an assessment against the expanded upon sections of the Guidelines:
· Section 2 Design Issues
S2.3.2 - Sign placement in transport corridors in urban areas
Consideration must be given to the compatibility of advertising development with surrounding land uses and whether such advertising will impact on sensitive locations. For instance, placement of advertising along transport corridors should not result in increased visibility of signage in adjacent or surrounding residential areas.
See assessment in schedule 1 above with particular regard to incompatible location of the signage with regards to the inherent location of residential uses existing and envisaged for the business zone. In short, the proposed location of the signage is inconsistent with the objectives of the B2 zone as it is inconsistent with the predominant location of outdoor advertising in the area at ground and first floor level parapets at a height line where residential uses are currently located and where they are inherently located within the Kingsford Centre.
S2.4 Sign Clutter Controls – see Section 4 of the Table above.
S2.5 Site specific and structural criteria
S2.5.1 d) The placement of the advertising structure should not require the removal of significant trees or other native vegetation. Complies
S2.5.1 e) The advertisement proposal should incorporate landscaping that complements the advertising structure and is in keeping with the landscape and character of the transport corridor.
• The development of a landscape management plan may be required as a condition of consent.
• Landscaping outlined within the plan should require minimal maintenance.
The proposal includes landscaping that complements the advertising structure however it is not in keeping with the landscape and character of the transport corridor which is located at street level and where newer development occurs within planters that align with the street.
S2.5.1 f) Any safety devices, platforms, lighting devices or logos should be designed as an integral part of the signage or structure on which it is to be displayed. No details on safety devices provided. Logo is displayed at the bottom of the sign.
S2.5.2 Wall Advertisements
The proposed wall advertisement does not protrude more than 300mm beyond the southern elevation however the proposed sign has an area of 42.8sqm and takes up 12% of the 353sqm of the southern elevation of the front building that protrudes above the adjoining site at No. 307 Anzac Parade. The proposed wall advertisement is also inconsistent with Section 2 Design issues of the Guidelines as assessed in Section 1.1 of this report: Schedule 1 of SEPP 64 (recreated in Table 2 of the Guidelines).
S2.5.8 Digital Signs
The consent authority must be satisfied that the digital sign meets the criteria listed in Table 3 of the guidelines identifying controls regarding:
· the motion and message sequencing;
· signage must not be capable of being mistaken for prescribed traffic control devises or providing driver instructions;
· dwell times limited to not less than 10 seconds (proposal provides a dwell time of 15 seconds) as Anzac Parade has a speed zone <80km/hr. (note: S2.5.10 allows for a higher dwell time for improved residential amenity);
· limited transition time between messages;
· maximum luminance levels;
· limitations on signage actions, text content, required to be fixed during school zone hours;
· ability for re-assessment of signage conditions should road conditions change;
· requirement for a log of signage displayed to be kept and requirement for road safety check.
The applicant has indicated that the proposed development will meet the minimum criteria for digital signs in the Guidelines, It is noted that RMS has provided concurrence subject to conditions and should consent be granted suitable conditions may be included such as prohibiting video and animated signs facing a road reserve.
· Section 3: Advertisements and road safety: Criteria and requirements for road safety and illuminance may be met by conditions from RMS and Council’s Environmental Health Section.
· Section 4 – Public benefits test for advertisement proposals – Public benefit is provided as part of the proposed PA and whilst negotiation of a PA is undertaken independent of the assessment of this DA for the purpose of probity and transparency, the Consent authority is required to consider all relevant matters for consideration under Clause 13 of SEPP 64, which includes an assessment of planning matters in Schedule 1 of the SEPP and the Guidelines.
As part of an assessment against Schedule 1 and the Guidelines, the proposal fails on planning grounds in that it will not be consistent with the existing character of the area and nor will it be consistent with the desired future character of the area. The proposed signage will result in visual clutter and contribute to complexity of signage in the area. It is also considered that the proposed sign and green wall which encroaches over the side boundary of the adjoining lot will hinder amalgamation and redevelopment of sites to the south of the subject site to that level is permissible and envisaged in the Kingsford Centre under the K2K planning proposal – a draft EPI.
1.3 Randwick Comprehensive Development Control Plan 2013:
o Part B4- Landscaping and Biodiversity
The proposed green wall contains significant material outlining the ongoing maintenance of planting which satisfies the RDCP. Councils Landscape Officer has also commented on the proposed green wall recommending conditions to be applied should the DA be recommended for approval.
o Part D2 - Kingsford Centre
The DCP does not provide outdoor advertising signage guidelines outside of the provisions contained in Part F2 of the RDCP for Outdoor advertising and signage. Notwithstanding, this part of the DCP does contain provisions requiring non-residential uses at ground and first floor level and as discussed in other sections of this report, the proposed location of the signage above these levels will be inconsistent with the existing and desired future character of the Kingsford Centre. In relation to existing characteristics and desired future development, the Town Centre has an established commercial area with small and fragmented allotments and for future development:
· that site amalgamation is required to enable redevelopment and contribute to the desired future character of the area (S2.1) and,
· that a nil-side setback arrangement across all storeys is generally acceptable (S2.4).
Given the subject site already contains a nil side setback and the proposal seeks to locate the signage encroaching over the side boundary shared with No. 307 Anzac Parade, it would mean that for at least 15 years, the signage would discouraged amalgamation and re-development of the adjoining sites to the south or potentially isolate the site at No. 307 Anzac Parade. Having regard to the above, the proposed development is both inconsistent with the existing and the desired future character of the Kingsford Centre. Additionally, as discussed in the key issues section of this report under the draft K2K Planning Proposal and comments provided by Council’s Strategic Planning department, the proposed signage is inconsistent with the strategy and desired future character of the Kingsford Centre.
o Part F2 – Outdoor advertising and signage
DCP Clause |
Control |
Proposal |
Compliance |
2 |
General Design and Siting |
||
|
(i) Signage should recognise the legitimate needs for directional advice, business identification and promotion. |
The signage is for advertising promotion which is not confined to the actual business located on site. The proposed advertising structure is inconsistent with the predominant nature of signage within the Kingsford Centre which contains low-scale signage associated with the identification of businesses and the services that they offer rather than being for the purposes of ‘advertising’. |
Does not comply |
|
(ii) Signage must complement and be compatible with the development on which it is situated and with adjoining development. |
The signage is incompatible with the existing development and dominates the adjoining development to the south. It will be highly visible from northbound vehicular traffic from around 500m away and pedestrian traffic along both sides of Anzac Parade. |
Does not comply |
|
(iii) Signage should not obscure architecturally decorative details or features of buildings or dominate building facades. It should be placed on the undecorated wall surfaces or designed sign panels provided. |
The signage at the 6th storey will dominate the predominately residential uses that exist and likely to exist at this level that is above the two storey commercial/retail strip of shops and mixed-use developments. The proposed signage as viewed south of the site will sit above and dominate the row of two storey shop premises located south of the subject site. |
Does not comply |
|
(iv) Entry building facades and /or walls must not be painted or covered with cladding or other material to act as a large billboard type. |
N/A |
N/A |
|
(v) Where a building or site contains multiple tenancies or uses, a coordinated approach for all signs is required. |
The site contains only one shop premises with entry for the residential off to the side. Signage is only provided at ground level under the awning |
Complies |
|
(ix) Signage must not be flashing or animated. |
The signage will involve a cycle of illuminated advertisements however, the proposed sign is permitted under SEPP 64 and the Guidelines which prevails to the extent of this inconsistency. It is also noted that RMS concurrence has been provided subject to a condition whereby images displayed on the sign must not contain/use: · Flashing or flickering lights or content · Animated displays, moving parts or simulated movement · Complex displays that hold a driver’s attention beyond “glance appreciation” · Displays resembling traffic control devices by use of colour, shape or words that can be · construed as giving instruction to traffic for example, red, amber or green circles, · octagons, crosses, triangles and words such as ‘stop’ or ‘halt’ · A method of illumination that distracts or dazzles · Dominant use of colours red or green |
No, however illuminated signs are permitted under the SEPP 64 and the Guidelines and prevail. See comment at left. |
3 |
Signage Based on land use zones |
||
3.2 |
Business Zones |
||
|
(i) The size and shape of any signage must relate to the size of the building or space to which it is to be attached to or placed on. Larger building facades are capable of accommodating larger signs without detracting from the appearance of the building. |
Wall advertisements located at the side elevations are anticipated as being located at first floor level. The proposed signage at 6th storey isn’t anticipated in the business zone where business premises are largely contained at ground and first floor level only. |
Does not comply |
|
(ii) Signage must not dominate or obscure a building or its architectural features. Advertising should highlight and reinforce architectural details. |
The proposed advertising structure will dominate the two-storey scale of buildings located south of the site along Anzac Parade. |
Does not comply |
|
(iii) Roof signs and advertising structures must not project above the parapet of the building or that part of the building to which they are attached (including signs and bunting mounted on plant rooms or other roof structures). |
The proposed sign will project above the parapet of No. 307 Anzac Parade by a significant amount. |
Does not comply |
|
(iv) Avoid fin signs, projecting wall signs and above awning signs (sitting on the awning). |
The wall advertising structure projects 300mm beyond the face of the buildings southern elevation and complies with SEPP 64. |
Complies |
|
(Vii) Upper level signs are best located at major focal points of a building only, to advertise arcades, plazas, etc…and to provide as corporate identity for developments which contain a range of businesses. |
The major focal point of the building is located at the front ground and first floor level as is the major focal points of other buildings in the area. The proposed advertising structure is located at the side of the building at the 6th level which is above and outside the focal point of the building. |
Does not comply |
|
(Viii) Outdoor advertising on or attached to buildings must align and relate to the architectural design lines on a building façade or, in the absence of architectural detail or decoration, relate to the design lines of adjacent buildings. |
The southern elevation of the existing building contains only variations in materials associated with floors and walls in a rectangular shape. The proposed advertising structure extends beyond these existing lines of the building and sits well above the two storey design lines of the adjacent building. |
Does not comply. |
|
(viii) Limit under awning to one per shop or for larger premises one per 6 metres of shop frontage. |
None proposed. |
NA |
|
(ix) Under awning signs must be at least 2.6 metres above footpath level. |
None proposed. |
NA |
Nil
Responsible officer: Louis Coorey, Senior Environmental Planning Officer
File Reference: DA/571/2019
Randwick Local Planning Panel meeting
Development Application Report No. D37/20
|
Subject: 8 Day Avenue, Kensington (DA/106/2020) |
|
|
|
|
Subject Site |
|
|
|
Submissions received
Ù North
|
|
Locality Plan |
1. Executive summary
The application is referred to the Randwick Local Planning Panel (RLPP) as:
· The development involves works to an existing heritage item.
The proposal seeks development consent for the construction of an in-ground swimming pool with associated deck and landscaping works to the rear of the site.
The key issues associated with the proposal relate to the impact that the development may have upon the heritage significance of the site and the amenity of the adjoining properties.
The proposal is recommended for approval subject to conditions of consent.
2. Site Description and Locality
The subject site is known as No. 8 Day Avenue, Kensington and is legally described as Lot 249 in DP 13208. The site is located on the northern side of Day Avenue between Tunstall Avenue to the west and Inglethorpe Avenue to the east.
The site is 533.2m2, is regular in shape and has a 12.495m frontage to Day Avenue to the south. The site contains a bungalow style residential dwelling which is identified within the Randwick LEP 2012 as of heritage significance (Listing No. I119). The site is one of six heritage bungalows on the street located between No.6 and No.10, both also identified as heritage bungalows.
The locality is residential in nature and contains a mixture of low-density residential development comprising of mostly single and two storey dwelling houses.
The existing rear yard is currently mostly turfed with paving at the far north and decking adjoining the dwelling. The site is in close proximity to the Australian Golf Club, The University of New South Wales and Anzac Parade.
An existing Lemon Scented Gum Corymbia citridora tree is located at the north-eastern corner of the site at the rear where the works are proposed. The tree itself will be retained and protected as outlined within the applicants submitted arborist report.
Figure 1. Streetscape view; 8 Day Avenue, Kensington
Figure 2+3. Existing rear view; 8 Day Avenue, Kensington
3. Relevant history
DA/159/2010/A:
Council granted consent on 10 February 2011 for a section 96 modification (now known as 4.55) of the approved development by the addition of a window at first floor level on the eastern façade.
DA/951/2011:
Council granted consent to Development Application No. DA/951/2011 for the pruning of a hazardous branch from a eucalyptus tree at the rear.
DA/460/2012:
Council granted consent to Development Application No. DA/460/2012 for the addition of skylight on western side of the existing dwelling on 22 August 2012.
4. Proposal
The proposal seeks development consent for the construction of a 9m x 3m in-ground concrete swimming pool with a 39,000L capacity. The pool has a shallow depth of 1,000mm and a maximum depth of 1,800mm. The proposed pool filter equipment is to be located behind the proposed new section of decking at the north of the site and to be enclosed with a soundproof enclosure.
The DA also proposes associated landscaping works that include paving and decking around the new pool and 1,200mm glass panel pool fencing in accordance with NSW pool fencing regulations. Associated works also include new fencing to the rear of the site and 300mm pot planting of Elaeocarpus eumundi at the northern boundary with a 3m mature height.
5. Notification
The owners of the adjoining sites and likely affected neighboring properties were notified of the proposed development in accordance with Councils Public Notification process. No submissions were received as a result of the notification process.
6. Relevant Environment Planning Instruments
6.1. State Environmental Planning Policy (Building Sustainability Index) 2004
The trigger for BASIX Certification is when the estimated cost of works for residential development (new dwelling(s)/alterations and additions) is equal to or above $50,000. BASIX Certification is also triggered when proposing a swimming pool with a volume of 40,000 litres. The total volume of each of the in-ground swimming pools are below the 40,000 litre volume.
Therefore, no BASIX Certification is required under the provisions of the SEPP (Building Sustainability Index: BASIX) 2004.
6.2. State Environmental Planning Policy No 55 – Remediation of Land
State Environmental Planning Policy No. 55 - Remediation of Land (SEPP 55) applies to all land and aims to provide for a State-wide planning approach to the remediation of contaminated land.
Clause 7 of SEPP 55 requires the consent authority to consider whether land is contaminated prior to granting consent to the carrying out of any development on that land. The subject site is not identified under RLEP 2012 as constituting contaminated land or land that must be subject to a site audit statement. Accordingly, nothing restricts Council, under SEPP 55, from consenting to the carrying out of the development.
6.3. Randwick Local Environmental Plan 2012 (LEP)
The site is zoned R2 Low Density Residential under Randwick Local Environmental Plan 2012 and the proposal is permissible with consent.
The proposal is consistent with the specific objectives of the zone in that the proposed activity and built form will not be impacted by the proposed pool and associated works.
The following development standards in the RLEP 2012 apply to the proposal:
Clause |
Development Standard |
Proposal |
Compliance (Yes/No) |
Cl 4.4: Floor space ratio (max) |
0.5:1 |
No change |
Yes |
Cl 4.3: Building height (max) |
9.5m |
No change |
Yes |
6.3.1. Clause 5.10 - Heritage conservation
Clause 5.10 requires Council to consider the effect of the proposed development on the heritage significance of the heritage item or heritage conservation area. The site is listed as a Heritage Item (I119). The application was subsequently referred to Council’s Heritage Planner for review. The comments provided by Council’s Heritage Planner are included in Appendix 1.
7. Development control plans and policies
7.1 Randwick Comprehensive DCP 2013
The DCP provisions are structured into two components: objectives and controls. The objectives provide the framework for assessment under each requirement and outline key outcomes that a development is expected to achieve. The controls contain both numerical standards and qualitative provisions. Any proposed variations from the controls may be considered only where the applicant successfully demonstrates that an alternative solution could result in a more desirable planning and urban design outcome.
The relevant provisions of the DCP are addressed in Appendix 2.
8. Environmental Assessment
The site has been inspected and the application has been assessed having regard to Section 4.15 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979, as amended.
Section 4.15 ‘Matters for Consideration’ |
Comments |
Section 4.15 (1)(a)(i) – Provisions of any environmental planning instrument |
See discussion in sections 6 & 7 and key issues below.
|
Section 4.15(1)(a)(ii) – Provisions of any draft environmental planning instrument |
Nil. |
Section 4.15(1)(a)(iii) – Provisions of any development control plan |
The proposal generally satisfies the objectives and controls of the Randwick Comprehensive DCP 2013. See table in Appendix 2 and the discussion in key issues below.
|
Section 4.15(1)(a)(iiia) – Provisions of any Planning Agreement or draft Planning Agreement |
Not applicable. |
Section 4.15(1)(a)(iv) – Provisions of the regulations |
The relevant clauses of the Regulations have been satisfied. |
Section 4.15(1)(b) – The likely impacts of the development, including environmental impacts on the natural and built environment and social and economic impacts in the locality |
The environmental impacts of the proposed development on the natural and built environment have been addressed in this report.
The proposed development is consistent with the dominant character in the locality and will therefore not result in any impacts to the dominant character of the locality as viewed from the street.
The proposal will not result in detrimental social or economic impacts on the locality. |
Section 4.15(1)(c) – The suitability of the site for the development |
The site is located in close proximity to local services and public transport. The site has sufficient area to accommodate the proposed land use and associated structures. Therefore, the site is considered suitable for the proposed development. |
Section 4.15(1)(d) – Any submissions made in accordance with the EP&A Act or EP&A Regulation
|
No submissions were received as a result of the notification process. |
Section 4.15(1)(e) – The public interest |
The proposal promotes the objectives of the zone and will not result in any significant adverse environmental, social or economic impacts on the locality. Accordingly, the proposal is considered to be in the public interest. |
9. Conclusion
That the application to construct a 39,000L in-ground swimming pool with associated landscaping works that include paving, decking and new fencing to the rear of the site be approved (subject to conditions) for the following reasons:
· The proposal is consistent with the relevant objectives contained within the RLEP 2012 and the relevant requirements of the RDCP 2013
· The proposal is consistent with the specific objectives of Clause 5.10 Heritage Conservation
· The scale and design of the proposal is considered to be suitable for the location and is compatible with the desired future character of the locality.
Appendix 1: Referrals
1. Internal referral comments:
1.1. Heritage planner
The subject application was referred to Council’s Heritage Planner who provided the following recommendation:
The Site
The site is occupied by a single storey Californian Bungalow style dwelling with lower ground level garage incorporated into the steeply sloping site, which is listed as a heritage item under Randwick LEP 2012. The Heritage NSW database sheet for the property includes the following description: “Garage at basement level. Stairs run beside the front rather than at 90 degrees. Roof form different to that of No. 10 but quite compatible. Large jerkin head gable. Appears more or less unaltered. Some interesting detail.” . A number of surrounding dwellings are also listed as heritage items including nos.1 – 5 Day Avenue, and nos.6 – 10 Day Avenue. The Inventory Sheet for nos.6 – 10 notes them to be an “Outstanding group of three bungalows. Complement those opposite. Same general comments apply.” The Inventory Sheet for nos.1 – 5 notes “Considerable variation in design but strong consistency in colours, material and massing … Simply styled in keeping with period. … Such grand examples of the style rare in the Municipality. Especially valuable for their intactness and fine streetscape grouping.”
Proposal
The application proposes to construct a new swimming pool in the rear garden of the property, adjacent to the eastern side boundary.
Submission
The application has been accompanied by a Heritage Impact Statement prepared by Taylor Brammer. The HIS advises that DA/159/2010 included a new first floor and restoration of the street front of the dwelling including tuck pointing of the brick work, painting and terracotta tiling. The HIS concludes that:
Through a review of the historical values of the place, the proposal of an in-ground pool to the rear of No 8 Day Avenue will have no impact on the relationship of the front façade of the house and streetscape with no change to the streetscape presentation of the house and garden. There will be minimal impact to the rear of the property due to the in ground location of the proposed pool and the proposed landscape treatment. There will be no impact on the existing landscape patterns of the place by the virtue of the location of the swimming pool in the rear garden and the retention of the Lemon Scented tree.
Controls
Clause 5.10(1) of Randwick Local Environmental Plan 2012 includes and Objective of conserving the heritage significance of heritage items and heritage conservation areas, including associated fabric, setting and views.
Clause 5.10(4) of Randwick Local Environmental Plan 2012 requires Council to consider the effect of the proposed development on the heritage significance of the heritage item or heritage conservation area.
The Heritage section of Randwick Development Control Plan 2013 provided Objectives and Controls in relation to heritage properties. In relation to Gardens, Garden Elements and Swimming Pools, clause 2.11 of the DCP includes a Control that swimming pools must be located at the area of the property and where possible should retain important trees an areas of soft landscaping. Swimming pools must not result in significant changes to ground levels on the site.
Comments
The proposed swimming pool is to be located in the rear garden of the property. The landscape section drawing shows a raised planter box along the western side boundary and suggests that the existing turf is at a level of 33.74, and do not show any cut and fill on the site. The site survey indicates a considerable fall from west to east, and does not indicate the retaining wall associated with the planter box. Given the fall of the site, the proposed levels associated with the swimming pool are not unreasonable. The proposed swimming pool will somewhat reduce the grassed area in the rear garden, but it appears that no tree removal is required. There are no heritage objections to the proposed swimming pool in the rear garden which will be generally consistent with DCP Controls.
Recommendation
No additional consent conditions are required.
1.2 Tree Management & Landscape Comments
The subject application was also referred to Council’s Landscape Officer who provided the following recommendation:
There is a semi-mature Ulmus parvifolia (Chinese Weeping Elm) on Council’s verge, to the west of the existing driveway, centrally across the width of the site, whose true size has been reduced to about 4m x 4m due to heavy topping away from the overhead wires, but still appears in good health, is protected by the DCP, and is also part of a formal strategy of this species, which as a group, contribute to the streetscape and heritage characteristics of the area.
While there are no external works that would pose a direct threat to this tree, in recognition of its importance to the future streetscape, protection conditions and a bond have still been imposed so as to avoid secondary impacts such as damage by trucks, machinery, deliveries and similar.
The only other vegetation that requires assessment for this application is in the rear setback of the subject site, right in the northeast corner, where there is a mature, 16m tall Corymbia maculata (Spotted Gum), of fair health and condition that is also protected by the DCP.
The natural fall of ground levels away to the east gives it a slightly elevated position, with its crown observed to have a presence in the immediate area, and whilst not shown on the survey, there is an existing retaining wall and planter box to its west, that steps up the block towards the northwest site corner, which is shown as being retained, to which, additional screen planting will be added, with concrete surfacing also existing in front (to the south) of this wall.
The threats identified to its preservation, in order of both proximity and severity, are excavations associated with:
· Footings for the elevated timber deck in the area between the tree and pool surrounds;
· Preparation of sub-grade and changes to existing ground levels for the paved pool surrounds;
· Pipe work for the pool filter and equipment;
· The northern wall of the actual pool.
While decking will completely surround its trunk, conditions require that it be supported on localised pad footings, so that ground disturbance and root damage is minimised, with Council also requiring that the existing impervious surface in this area be formally demolished and removed by hand, as this will improve future growing conditions.
When scaled off the plans, the paved pool surround will be offset about 3200mm to its south, with the actual pool wall to be 3800mm away (both measured from the centre of its trunk), with the Arborist Report calculating that this would be wholly outside of its Structural Root Zone (SRZ), and while it will encroach its less critical Tree Protection Zone (TPZ), will only amount to 9.61%, which is categorised as minor (>10%), and on this basis, can be managed by the tree, so has been supported by the Arborist.
Relevant tree protection measures have been included in this report to ensure it is retained as an existing site feature as part of this development.
Appendix 2: DCP Compliance Table
Section C1: Low Density Residential
Controls |
Proposal |
Compliance |
|
2 |
Site planning |
|
|
2.4 |
Landscaping and permeable surfaces |
||
|
i) Up to 300 sqm = 20% ii) 301 to 450 sqm = 25% iii) 451 to 600 sqm = 30% iv) 601 sqm or above = 35% v) Deep soil minimum width 900mm. vi) Maximise permeable surfaces to front vii) Retain existing or replace mature native trees viii) Minimum 1 canopy tree (8m mature). Smaller (4m mature) If site restrictions apply. ix) Locating paved areas, underground services away from root zones. |
Site = 533.2m2
Proposed = 166.21m2 (31%) |
Complies |
2.5 |
Private open space (POS) |
||
|
Dwelling & Semi-Detached POS |
|
|
|
Up to 300 sqm = 5m x 5m 301 to 450 sqm = 6m x 6m 451 to 600 sqm = 7m x 7m 601 sqm or above = 8m x 8m |
Site = 533.2m2
Private open space exceeds 7m x 7m. |
Complies |
3.3 |
Setbacks |
||
3.3.1 |
Front setbacks i) Average setbacks of adjoining (if none then no less than 6m) Transition area then merit assessment. ii) Corner allotments: Secondary street frontage: - 900mm for allotments with primary frontage width of less than 7m - 1500mm for all other sites iii) do not locate swimming pools, above-ground rainwater tanks and outbuildings in front |
No change to existing front setback. |
Complies |
3.3.2 |
Side setbacks: Semi-Detached Dwellings: · Frontage less than 6m = merit · Frontage b/w 6m and 8m = 900mm for all levels Dwellings: · Frontage less than 9m = 900mm · Frontage b/w 9m and 12m = 900mm (Gnd & 1st floor) 1500mm above · Frontage over 12m = 1200mm (Gnd & 1st floor), 1800mm above.
Refer to 6.3 and 7.4 for parking facilities and outbuildings |
The proposed pool is located with a 1m setback to the eastern boundary. Retaining wall on eastern boundary is to be retained also. |
Complies |
3.3.3 |
Rear setbacks i) Minimum 25% of allotment depth or 8m, whichever lesser. Note: control does not apply to corner allotments. ii) Provide greater than aforementioned or demonstrate not required, having regard to: - Existing predominant rear setback line - reasonable view sharing (public and private) - protect the privacy and solar access iii) Garages, carports, outbuildings, swimming or spa pools, above-ground water tanks, and unroofed decks and terraces attached to the dwelling may encroach upon the required rear setback, in so far as they comply with other relevant provisions. iv) For irregularly shaped lots = merit assessment on basis of:- - Compatibility - POS dimensions comply - minimise solar access, privacy and view sharing impacts
Refer to 6.3 and 7.4 for parking facilities and outbuildings |
The pool is proposed to be setback 4.6m from the rear boundary. |
Complies |
4 |
Building design |
||
4.6 |
Earthworks |
|
|
|
i) excavation and backfilling limited to 1m, unless gradient too steep ii) minimum 900mm side and rear setback iii) Step retaining walls iv) site conditions allow for side or rear setback less than 900mm (max 2.2m) v) sloping sites down to street level must minimise blank retaining walls (use combination of materials, and landscaping) vi) cut and fill for POS is terraced where site has significant slope: vii) adopt a split-level design viii) Minimise height and extent of any exposed under-croft areas. |
The proposal includes excavation to a maximum depth of 1.8m for the inground swimming pool with a 1000mm side setback. The extent of excavation is appropriate for a swimming pool. |
Complies |
5 |
Amenity |
||
5.4 |
Acoustic Privacy |
||
|
i) Noise sources not located adjacent to adjoining dwellings bedroom windows Attached dual occupancies ii) Reduce noise transmission between dwellings by: - Locate noise-generating areas and quiet areas adjacent to each other. - Locate less sensitive areas adjacent to the party wall to serve as noise buffer. |
Proposed pool is to be located within the rear yard, not expected to generate any noise greater than that expected on a residential allotment .
Pool filter to be housed within a soundproof filter box behind decking. |
Complies |
7 |
Fencing and Ancillary Development |
||
7.5 |
Swimming pools and Spas |
||
|
i) Locate behind the front building line
ii) Minimise damage to existing tree root systems on subject and adjoining sites.
i) Locate to minimise noise impacts on the adjoining dwellings.
ii) Pool and coping level related to site topography (max 1m over lower side of site).
iii) Setback coping a minimum of 900mm from the rear and side boundaries.
iv) Incorporate screen planting (min. 3m mature height unless view corridors affected) between setbacks.
v) Position decking to minimise privacy impacts.
vi) Pool pump and filter contained in acoustic enclosure and away from the neighbouring dwellings. |
The proposed swimming pool is located at the rear of the property behind the building line.
Existing tree at the rear to be protected and retained as per arborist report and conditions from Councils Landscape Officer
Location of the pool considered acceptable.
Pool is located at existing ground level.
The pool is setback 4.6m from the rear boundary and 1m from the eastern boundary. Existing retaining wall on the eastern boundary is to be retained
Screen planting is proposed at the rear northern boundary.
Decking located at rear and maintains ground level.
Pool filter to be housed within a soundproof enclosure behind decking at rear. |
Complies |
1.⇩ |
Dev Consent Conditions (general) - DA/106/2020 - 8 Day Avenue, Kensington |
|
Responsible officer: Roseanna Meech, Student Environmental Planning Officer
File Reference: DA/106/2020
Dev Consent Conditions (general) - DA/106/2020 - 8 Day Avenue, KENSINGTON |
Attachment 1 |
DA No: |
DA/106/2020 |
Property: |
8 Day Avenue, KENSINGTON NSW 2033 |
Proposal: |
New in ground swimming pool (Heritage Item). |
Recommendation: |
Approval |
Development Consent Conditions
GENERAL CONDITIONS
The development must be carried out in accordance with the following conditions of consent.
These conditions have been applied to satisfy the relevant requirements of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979, Environmental Planning & Assessment Regulation 2000 and to provide reasonable levels of environmental amenity.
Approved Plans & Supporting Documentation
1. The development must be implemented substantially in accordance with the plans and supporting documentation listed below and endorsed with Council’s approved stamp, except where amended by Council in red and/or by other conditions of this consent:
Plan |
Drawn by |
Dated |
LA01 (Rev A) |
Taylor Brammer |
18/02/2020 |
LA02 (Rev A) |
18/02/2020 |
|
LA03 (Rev B) |
29/06/2020 |
|
LA04 (Rev A) |
07/05/2020 |
REQUIREMENTS BEFORE A CONSTRUCTION CERTIFICATE CAN BE ISSUED
The following conditions of consent must be complied with before a ‘Construction Certificate’ is issued by either Randwick City Council or an Accredited Certifier. All necessary information to demonstrate compliance with the following conditions of consent must be included in the documentation for the construction certificate.
These conditions have been applied to satisfy the relevant requirements of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979, Environmental Planning & Assessment Regulation 2000, Council’s development consent conditions and to achieve reasonable levels of environmental amenity.
Consent Requirements
2. The requirements and amendments detailed in the ‘General Conditions’ must be complied with and be included in the construction certificate plans and associated documentation.
Compliance Fee
3. A development compliance and enforcement fee of $93.00 shall be paid to Council in accordance with Council’s adopted Fees & Charges Pricing Policy, prior to the issue of a Construction Certificate for development.
Long Service Levy Payments
4. The required Long Service Levy payment, under the Building and Construction Industry Long Service Payments Act 1986, must be forwarded to the Long Service Levy Corporation or the Council, in accordance with Section 6.8 of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979.
At the time of this development consent, Long Service Levy payment is applicable on building work having a value of $25,000 or more, at the rate of 0.35% of the cost of the works.
Sydney Water Requirements
5. All building, plumbing and drainage work must be carried out in accordance with the requirements of the Sydney Water Corporation.
The approved plans must be submitted to the Sydney Water Tap in™ online service, to determine whether the development will affect Sydney Water’s waste water and water mains, stormwater drains and/or easements, and if any further requirements need to be met.
The Sydney Water Tap in™ online service replaces the Quick Check Agents as of 30 November 2015
The Tap in™ service provides 24/7 access to a range of services, including:
· Building plan approvals
· Connection and disconnection approvals
· Diagrams
· Trade waste approvals
· Pressure information
· Water meter installations
· Pressure boosting and pump approvals
· Change to an existing service or asset, e.g. relocating or moving an asset.
Sydney Water’s Tap in™ in online service is available at:
The Principal Certifying Authority must ensure that the developer/owner has submitted the approved plans to Sydney Water Tap in online service.
Landscape Plans
6. Written certification from a qualified professional in the Landscape/Horticultural industry (must be eligible for membership with a nationally recognised organisation/association) must state that the Landscape Plans submitted for the Construction Certificate are substantially consistent with the Landscape Plans by Taylor Brammer Landscape Architects Pty Ltd, as reference in Condition 1, with both this statement and plans to then be submitted to, and be approved by, the PCA/Certifying Authority.
Street Tree Protection
7. In order to ensure retention of the Ulmus parvifolia (Chinese Weeping Elm) that is located on Council’s Day Avenue verge, to the west of the driveway in good health, the following measures are to be undertaken:
a. All documentation submitted for the Construction Certificate application must show its retention, with the position and diameter of both its trunk and canopy to be clearly and accurately shown on all plans.
b. Any excavations associated with the installation of new services, pipes, stormwater systems or similar over this frontage must be within existing services lines only, with the Certifying Authority/PCA to ensure all site services plans are both prepared and installed on-site to comply with this requirement.
c. This tree must be physically protected by installing evenly spaced star pickets at a setback of 1.5 metres to its east and west (measured off the outside edge of its trunk at ground level), matching up with the kerb to its south and footpath to its north, to which, safety tape/para-webbing/shade cloth or similar shall be permanently attached so as to completely enclose the tree for the duration of works.
d. This fencing shall be installed prior to the commencement of demolition and construction works and shall remain in place until all works are completed, to which, signage containing the following words shall be clearly displayed and permanently attached: “TREE PROTECTION ZONE (TPZ), DO NOT REMOVE/ENTER".
e. The applicant is not authorised to perform any other works to this public tree, and must contact Council’s Landscape Development Officer on 9093-6613 should clearance pruning or similar appear necessary. If approval is given, it can only be performed by Council (giving 4 weeks notice), wholly at the applicants cost, with payment to be received prior to pruning, and prior to any Occupation Certificate.
f. Within the TPZ, there is to be no storage of materials, machinery or site office/sheds, nor is cement to be mixed or chemicals spilt/disposed of and no stockpiling of soil or rubble, with all Site Management Plans needing to acknowledge these requirements.
g. The PCA must ensure compliance with all of these requirements, both on the plans as well as on-site during the course of construction, and prior to any Occupation Certificate.
h. A refundable deposit in the form of cash, credit card or cheque for an amount of $1,000.00 must be paid at the Cashier on the Ground Floor of the Administrative Centre, prior to a Construction Certificate being issued for the development, in order to ensure compliance with the conditions listed in this consent, and ultimately, preservation of the tree.
The refundable deposit will be eligible for refund following the issue of an Occupation Certificate, subject to completion and submission of Council’s ‘Security Deposit Refund Application Form’, and pending a satisfactory inspection by Council’s Landscape Development Officer (9093-6613).
Any contravention of Council's conditions relating to the tree at any time during the course of the works, or prior to an Occupation Certificate, may result in Council claiming all or part of the lodged security in order to perform any rectification works necessary, as per the requirements of 80A (6) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.
Tree Protection Measures
8. In order to also ensure retention of the mature Corymbia maculata (Spotted Gum) that is located in the rear setback of the subject site, in the northeast corner in good health as shown, the following measures are to be undertaken:
a. All documentation submitted for the Construction Certificate application must show its retention, with the position and diameter of both its trunk and canopy to be clearly and accurately shown in relation to all works.
b. Prior to the commencement of any site works, the Certifying Authority/PCA must ensure that an AQF Level 5 Arborist (who is eligible for membership with a nationally recognized organization/association) has been engaged as ‘the Project Arborist’ for the duration of works, and will be responsible for both implementing and monitoring the conditions of development consent, as well as the Tree Management Plan (TMP) contained at Section 4.0 of the Arboricultural Impact Assessment by Leigh Brennan of Tree Management Strategies, dated 02/03/20 (‘the Arborists Report’), along with any other instructions issued on-site.
c. The Project Arborist must be present on-site at the relevant stages of works, and must keep a log of the dates of attendance and the works performed, which is to be presented as a Final Compliance Report, for the approval of the PCA, prior to an Occupation Certificate.
d. In the event of any discrepancy between the Arborists Reports and the conditions of consent, the Arborist must contact Council’s Landscape Development Officer on 9093-6613 to reach agreement on the outcome before proceeding further with any works.
e. All plans submitted for the Construction Certificate must be amended to include the following additional requirements:
· Notations and details showing that the part of the existing concrete surfacing that falls beneath the new timber deck will be demolished/removed by hand;
· Distances (in millimetres) being included to show that a minimum setback of 3000mm will be provided from the centre of its trunk to excavations for the northern edge of the paved pool surrounds;
· The northern wall of the actual pool being offset a minimum of 3600mm, also measured from the centre of its trunk.
f. Amended plans complying with the requirements specified above must then be submitted to, and be approved by, the Certifying Authority/PCA, who must ensure that these requirements are also complied with on-site as part of construction.
g. The existing wall/planter box to its west, as well as the ground levels beneath the new timber deck must both be maintained as existing, with the deck to be supported on a flexible footing system, with minimal ground penetrations, such as localised pads, pier and beam sections or similar, as has been detailed at Step 3, page 16 of the Arborist Report.
h. Where major roots with a diameter of 50mm or more are encountered for the deck, the Project Arborist must ensure they are retained, with the footings to then be relocated around them as necessary.
i. The Project Arborist must certify (in writing) that excavations associated with the installation of new pipes associated with the pool filter, equipment or similar, will be performed at an acceptable offset from the tree, with the setback and locations to be shown on a plan, that must then be submitted to, and be approved by, the Certifying Authority/PCA.
j. All initial excavations associated with footings for the deck, the northern edge of the paved pool surrounds, the northern edge of the pool, as well as any pipework, pool equipment or changes to existing ground levels within its TPZ must be performed by hand, either by; or; under direct supervision of, the Project Arborist, with certification (including photos) to be presented as a Final Compliance Report to the Certifying Authority/PCA, with a copy to also be forwarded to Council
k. This tree is to be physically protected by the installation of trunk and ground protection, as well as 1.8 metre high steel mesh/chainwire fencing panels, as per Step 1 & 2 of the TMP in the Arborists Report, and to the extent that is shown ‘Tree Impact Plan’.
l. This fencing shall be installed prior to the commencement of demolition and construction works and shall remain in place until all works are completed, to which, signage containing the following words shall be clearly displayed and permanently attached: “TREE PROTECTION ZONE (TPZ), DO NOT REMOVE/ENTER".
m. In order to prevent soil/sediment being washed over its root system, erosion control measures must also be provided at ground level around the perimeter of the TPZ.
n. Within the TPZ, there is to be no storage of materials, machinery or site office/sheds, nor is cement to be mixed or chemicals spilt/disposed of and no stockpiling of soil or rubble, with all Site Management Plans needing to acknowledge these requirements.
o. Any new pool or boundary fencing, within a radius of 3 metres of its trunk, can only be a system which is supported on localised pad footings, not strip footings, with details confirming compliance to be shown on the Construction Certificate plans. If roots are encountered during installation of these footings, the Project Arborist must determine the appropriate course of action.
p. The Project Arborist and Certifying Authority/PCA must ensure compliance with all of these requirements, both on the plans as well as on-site during the course of construction, and prior to any Occupation Certificate.
REQUIREMENTS TO BE INCLUDED IN THE CONSTRUCTION CERTIFICATE
The requirements contained in the following conditions of consent must be complied with and details of compliance must be included in the construction certificate for the development.
These conditions have been applied to satisfy the relevant requirements of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979, Environmental Planning & Assessment Regulation 2000, Councils development consent conditions and to achieve reasonable levels of environmental amenity.
Compliance with the Building Code of Australia & Relevant Standards
9. In accordance with section 4.17 (11) of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979 and clause 98 of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Regulation 2000, it is a prescribed condition that all building work must be carried out in accordance with the provisions of the Building Code of Australia (BCA).
Site stability, Excavation and Construction work
10. A report must be obtained from a suitably qualified and experienced professional engineer, which includes the following details, to the satisfaction of the Certifying Authority for the development:-
a) Geotechnical details which confirm the suitability and stability of the site for the development and relevant design and construction requirements to be implemented to ensure the stability and adequacy of the development and adjacent land.
b) Details of the proposed methods of excavation and support for the adjoining land (including any public place) and buildings.
c) Details to demonstrate that the proposed methods of excavation, support and construction are suitable for the site and should not result in any damage to the adjoining premises, buildings or any public place, as a result of the works and any associated vibration.
d) The adjoining land and buildings located upon the adjoining land must be adequately supported at all times throughout demolition, excavation and building work, to the satisfaction of the Principal Certifying Authority.
e) Written approval must be obtained from the owners of the adjoining land to install any ground or rock anchors underneath the adjoining premises (including any public roadway or public place) and details must be provided to the Certifying Authority.
REQUIREMENTS PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORKS
The following conditions of consent must be complied with prior to the commencement of any works on the site. The necessary documentation and information must be provided to the Council or the ‘Principal Certifying Authority’, as applicable.
These conditions have been applied to satisfy the relevant requirements of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979, Environmental Planning & Assessment Regulation 2000 and to provide reasonable levels of public health, safety and environmental amenity.
Certification and Building Inspection Requirements
11. Prior to the commencement of any building works, the following requirements must be complied with:
a) a Construction Certificate must be obtained from the Council or an accredited certifier, in accordance with the provisions of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979.
A copy of the construction certificate, the approved development consent plans and consent conditions must be kept on the site at all times and be made available to the Council officers and all building contractors for assessment.
b) a Principal Certifying Authority (PCA) must be appointed to carry out the necessary building inspections and to issue an occupation certificate; and
c) a principal contractor must be appointed for the building work and the requirements of the Home Building Act 1989 must be satisfied accordingly; and
d) the principal contractor must be advised of the required critical stage inspections and other inspections to be carried out, as specified by the Principal Certifying Authority; and
e) at least two days notice must be given to the Council, in writing, prior to commencing any works.
Dilapidation Reports
12. A dilapidation report (incorporating photographs of relevant buildings) must be obtained from a Professional Engineer, detailing the current condition and status of all of the buildings and structures located upon all of the properties adjoining the subject site and any other property or public land which may be affected by the works, to the satisfaction of the Principal Certifying Authority.
The dilapidation report must be submitted to the Council, the Principal Certifying Authority and the owners of the adjoining/nearby premises encompassed in the report, prior to commencing any site works (including any demolition work, excavation work or building work).
Construction Site Management Plan
13. A Construction Site Management Plan must be developed and implemented prior to the commencement of any works. The construction site management plan must include the following measures, as applicable to the type of development:
· location and construction of protective site fencing / hoardings;
· location of site storage areas/sheds/equipment;
· location of building materials for construction;
· provisions for public safety;
· dust control measures;
· details of proposed sediment and erosion control measures;
· site access location and construction
· details of methods of disposal of demolition materials;
· protective measures for tree preservation;
· location and size of waste containers/bulk bins;
· provisions for temporary stormwater drainage;
· construction noise and vibration management;
· construction traffic management details;
· provisions for temporary sanitary facilities.
The site management measures must be implemented prior to the commencement of any site works and be maintained throughout the works, to the satisfaction of Council.
A copy of the Construction Site Management Plan must be provided to the Principal Certifying Authority and Council prior to commencing site works. A copy must also be maintained on site and be made available to Council officers upon request.
Demolition Work Plan
14. A Demolition Work Plan must be prepared for the development in accordance with Australian Standard AS2601-2001, Demolition of Structures and relevant environmental/work health and safety requirements.
The Demolition Work Plan must be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority (PCA), not less than two (2) working days before commencing any demolition work. A copy of the Demolition Work Plan must be maintained on site and be made available to Council officers upon request.
If the work involves asbestos products or materials, a copy of the Demolition Work Plan must also be provided to Council not less than 2 days before commencing those works.
Construction Noise & Vibration Management Plan
15. A Construction Noise & Vibration Management Plan, prepared in accordance with the Environment Protection Authority (EPA) Guidelines for Construction Noise and Assessing Vibration, by a suitably qualified person, is to be developed and implemented prior to commencing site work and throughout the course of construction, in accordance with the following requirements:
a) Noise and vibration emissions during the construction of the building and associated site works must not result in damage to nearby premises or result in an unreasonable loss of amenity to nearby residents.
Noise and vibration from any rock excavation machinery, pile drivers and all plant and equipment must be minimised, by using appropriate plant and equipment, silencers and the implementation of noise management strategies.
b) The Construction Noise & Vibration Management Plan must include details of measurements, analysis and relevant criteria and demonstrate that the noise and vibration emissions from the work satisfy the relevant provisions of the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997, current EPA Guidelines for Construction Noise and Assessing Vibration and Councils conditions of consent.
c) A further report/correspondence must be obtained from the consultant as soon as practicable upon the commencement of works, which reviews and confirms the implementation and suitability of the noise and vibration strategies in the Construction Noise & Vibration Management Plan and which demonstrates compliance with relevant criteria.
d) Any recommendations and requirements contained in the Construction Noise & Vibration Management Plan and associated reports are to be implemented accordingly and should noise and vibration emissions not comply with the terms and conditions of consent, work must cease forthwith and is not to recommence until details of compliance are submitted to Council and the PCA.
A copy of the Construction Noise & Vibration Management Plan and associated acoustic/vibration report/s must be maintained on-site and a copy must be provided to Council and the Principal Certifying Authority accordingly.
Public Utilities
16. The applicant must meet the full cost for telecommunication companies, gas providers, Ausgrid, and Sydney Water to adjust/repair/relocate their services as required. The applicant must make the necessary arrangements with the service authority.
REQUIREMENTS DURING CONSTRUCTION & SITE WORK
The following conditions of consent must be complied with during the demolition, excavation and construction of the development.
These conditions have been applied to satisfy the relevant requirements of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979, Environmental Planning & Assessment Regulation 2000 and to provide reasonable levels of public health, safety and environmental amenity during construction.
Inspections during Construction
17. Building works are required to be inspected by the Principal Certifying Authority, in accordance with section 6.5 of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979 and clause 162A of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Regulation 2000, to monitor compliance with the relevant standards of construction, Council’s development consent and the construction certificate.
Building & Demolition Work Requirements
18. The demolition, removal, storage, handling and disposal of products and materials containing asbestos must be carried out in accordance with Randwick City Council’s Asbestos Policy and the relevant requirements of SafeWork NSW and the NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA), including:
• Work Health and Safety Act 2011;
• Work Health and Safety Regulation 2011;
• SafeWork NSW Code of Practice for the Safe Removal of Asbestos;
• Australian Standard 2601 (2001) – Demolition of Structures;
• The Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997;
• Randwick City Council Asbestos Policy (adopted 13 September 2005).
A copy of Council’s Asbestos Policy is available on Council’s web site or a copy can be obtained from Council’s Customer Service Centre.
Removal of Asbestos Materials
19. Any work involving the demolition, storage or disposal of asbestos products and materials must be carried out in accordance with the following requirements:
· Occupational Health & Safety legislation and WorkCover NSW requirements
· Randwick City Council’s Asbestos Policy
· A WorkCover licensed demolition or asbestos removal contractor must undertake removal of more than 10m2 of bonded asbestos (or as otherwise specified by WorkCover or relevant legislation). Removal of friable asbestos material must only be undertaken by contractor that holds a current friable asbestos removal licence. A copy of the relevant licence must be provided to the Principal Certifying Authority.
· On sites involving the removal of asbestos, a sign must be clearly displayed in a prominent visible position at the front of the site, containing the words ‘DANGER ASBESTOS REMOVAL IN PROGRESS’ and include details of the licensed contractor.
· Asbestos waste must be stored, transported and disposed of in compliance with the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 and the Protection of the Environment Operations (Waste) Regulation 2005. Details of the landfill site (which must be lawfully able to receive asbestos materials) must be provided to the Principal Certifying Authority.
· A Clearance Certificate or Statement, prepared by a suitably qualified person (i.e. an occupational hygienist, licensed asbestos assessor or other competent person), must be provided to Council and the Principal certifying authority upon completion of the asbestos related works which confirms that the asbestos material have been removed appropriately and the relevant conditions of consent have been satisfied.
A copy of Council’s Asbestos Policy is available on Council’s web site at www.randwick.nsw.gov.au in the Building & Development Section or a copy can be obtained from Council’s Customer Service Centre.
Support of Adjoining Land
20. In accordance with section 4.17 (11) of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979 and clause 98 E of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Regulation 2000, it is a prescribed condition that the adjoining land and buildings located upon the adjoining land must be adequately supported at all times.
Sediment & Erosion Control
21. Sediment and erosion control measures, must be implemented throughout the site works in accordance with the manual for Managing Urban Stormwater – Soils and Construction, published by Landcom.
Details must be included in the Construction Site Management Plan and a copy must be provided to the Principal Certifying Authority and Council. A copy must also be maintained on site and be made available to Council officers upon request.
Temporary Site Fencing
22. Temporary site safety fencing or site hoarding must be provided to the perimeter of the site throughout demolition, excavation and construction works, to the satisfaction of Council, in accordance with the following requirements:
a) Temporary site fences or hoardings must have a height of 1.8 metres and be a cyclone wire fence (with geotextile fabric attached to the inside of the fence to provide dust control), or heavy-duty plywood sheeting (painted white), or other material approved by Council.
b) Hoardings and site fencing must be designed to prevent any substance from, or in connection with, the work from falling into the public place or adjoining premises and if necessary, be provided with artificial lighting.
c) All site fencing and hoardings must be structurally adequate, safe and be constructed in a professional manner and the use of poor quality materials or steel reinforcement mesh as fencing is not permissible.
d) An overhead (‘B’ Class) type hoarding is required is be provided to protect the public (unless otherwise approved by Council) if:
· materials are to be hoisted (i.e. via a crane or hoist) over a public footway;
· building or demolition works are to be carried out on buildings which are over 7.5m in height and located within 3.6m of the street alignment;
· it is necessary to prevent articles or materials from falling and causing a potential danger or hazard to the public or occupants upon adjoining land;
· as may otherwise be required by WorkCover, Council or the PCA.
Notes:
· Temporary site fencing may not be necessary if there is an existing adequate fence in place having a minimum height of 1.5m.
· If it is proposed to locate any site fencing, hoardings, amenities or articles upon any part of the footpath, nature strip or public place at any time, a separate Local Approval application must be submitted to and approved by Council’s Health, Building & Regulatory Services before placing any fencing, hoarding or other article on the road, footpath or nature strip.
Public Safety & Site Management
23. Public safety and convenience must be maintained at all times during demolition, excavation and construction works and the following requirements must be complied with to the satisfaction of Council:
a) Building materials, sand, soil, waste materials, construction equipment or other articles must not be placed upon the footpath, roadway or nature strip at any time.
b) The road, footpath, vehicular crossing and nature strip must be maintained in a good, safe, clean condition and free from any excavations, obstructions, trip hazards, goods, materials, soils or debris at all times. Any damage caused to the road, footway, vehicular crossing, nature strip or any public place must be repaired immediately, to the satisfaction of Council.
c) All building and site activities (including storage or placement of materials or waste and concrete mixing/pouring/pumping activities) must not cause or be likely to cause ‘pollution’ of any waters, including any stormwater drainage systems, street gutters or roadways.
Note: It is an offence under the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 to cause or be likely to cause ‘pollution of waters’, which may result in significant penalties and fines.
d) Access gates and doorways within site fencing, hoardings and temporary site buildings or amenities must not open outwards into the road or footway.
e) Bulk bins/waste containers must not be located upon the footpath, roadway or nature strip at any time without the prior written approval of the Council. Applications to place a waste container in a public place can be made to Council’s Health, Building and Regulatory Services department.
f) Adequate provisions must be made to ensure pedestrian safety and traffic flow during the site works, and traffic control measures are to be implemented in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Roads and Traffic Manual “Traffic Control at Work Sites” (Version 4), to the satisfaction of Council.
Site Signage
24. A sign must be erected and maintained in a prominent position on the site for the duration of the works, which contains the following details:
· name, address, contractor licence number and telephone number of the principal contractor, including a telephone number at which the person may be contacted outside working hours, or owner-builder permit details (as applicable)
· name, address and telephone number of the Principal Certifying Authority,
· a statement stating that “unauthorised entry to the work site is prohibited”.
Restriction on Working Hours
25. Building, demolition and associated site works must be carried out in accordance with the following requirements:
Activity |
Permitted working hours |
All building, demolition and site work, including site deliveries (except as detailed below) |
· Monday to Friday - 7.00am to 5.00pm · Saturday - 8.00am to 5.00pm · Sunday & public holidays - No work permitted |
Excavating or sawing of rock, use of jack-hammers, pile-drivers, vibratory rollers/compactors or the like
|
· Monday to Friday - 8.00am to 1.00pm only · Saturday - No work permitted · Sunday & public holidays - No work permitted |
Additional requirements for all development |
· Saturdays and Sundays where the preceding Friday and/or the following Monday is a public holiday - No work permitted |
An application to vary the abovementioned hours may be submitted to Council’s Manager Health, Building & Regulatory Services for consideration and approval to vary the specified hours may be granted in exceptional circumstances and for limited occasions (e.g. for public safety, traffic management or road safety reasons). Any applications are to be made on the standard application form and include payment of the relevant fees and supporting information. Applications must be made at least 10 days prior to the date of the proposed work and the prior written approval of Council must be obtained to vary the standard permitted working hours.
Building Encroachments
26. There must be no encroachment of any structures or building work onto Council’s road reserve, footway, nature strip or public place.
REQUIREMENTS PRIOR TO THE ISSUE OF AN OCCUPATION CERTIFICATE
The following conditions of consent must be complied with prior to the ‘Principal Certifying Authority’ issuing an ‘Occupation Certificate’.
Note: For the purpose of this consent, any reference to ‘occupation certificate’ shall also be taken to mean ‘interim occupation certificate’ unless otherwise stated.
These conditions have been applied to satisfy the relevant requirements of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979, Environmental Planning & Assessment Regulation 2000, Council’s development consent and to maintain reasonable levels of public health, safety and amenity.
Occupation Certificate Requirements
27. An Occupation Certificate must be obtained from the Principal Certifying Authority prior to any occupation of the building work encompassed in this development consent (including alterations and additions to existing buildings), in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979.
Swimming & Spa Pools
28. Swimming pools are to be designed and installed in accordance with the relevant requirements of the Building Code of Australia and be provided with childproof fences and self-locking gates, in accordance with the Swimming Pools Act 1992 and the Swimming Pools Regulation 2008.
The swimming pool is to be surrounded by a child-resistant barrier (e.g. fence), that separates the pool from any residential building (as defined in the Swimming Pools Act 1992) that is situated on the premises and from any place (whether public or private) adjoining the premises; and that is designed, constructed and installed in accordance with Australian Standard AS 1926.1 – 2012 (Swimming Pool Safety Part 1 - Safety Barriers for Swimming Pools).
Gates to pool area must be self-closing and latching at all times and, the gate is required to open outwards from the pool area and prevent a small child opening the gate or door when the gate or door is closed.
Temporary pool safety fencing is to be provided pending the completion of all building work and the pool must not be filled until a fencing inspection has been carried out and approved by the principal certifying authority.
A ‘warning notice’ must be erected in a prominent position in the immediate vicinity of the swimming pool, in accordance with the provisions of the Swimming Pools Regulation 2008, detailing pool safety requirements, resuscitation techniques and the importance of the supervision of children at all times.
29. Swimming pools (and spa pools) are to be designed, installed and operated in accordance with the following general requirements:
a) Backwash of the pool filter and other discharge of water is to be drained to the sewer in accordance with the requirements of the Sydney Water Corporation; and
b) All pool overflow water is to be drained away from the building and adjoining premises, so as not to result in a nuisance or damage to premises; and
c) Water recirculation and filtrations systems are required to comply with AS 1926.3 – 2010: Swimming Pool Safety – Water Recirculation and Filtration Systems; and
d) Pool plant and equipment is to be enclosed in a sound absorbing enclosure or installed within a building, to minimise noise emissions and possible nuisance to nearby residents.
Notification of Swimming Pools & Spa Pools
30. The owner of the premises must ‘register’ the swimming pool [or spa pool] on the NSW Swimming Pool Register, in accordance with the Swimming Pools Amendment Act 2012.
The Swimming Pool Register is administered by the NSW Office of Local Government and registration on the Swimming Pool Register may be made on-line via their website www.swimmingpoolregister.nsw.gov.au.
Registration must be made prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate for the pool and a copy of the NSW Swimming Pool Certificate of Registration must be forwarded to the Principal Certifying Authority and Council accordingly.
Council’s Infrastructure, Vehicular Crossings, street verge
31. The applicant must meet the full cost for Council or a Council approved contractor to repair/replace any damaged sections of Council's footpath, kerb & gutter, nature strip etc which are due to building works being carried out at the above site. This includes the removal of cement slurry from Council's footpath and roadway.
32. All external civil work to be carried out on Council property (including the installation and repair of roads, footpaths, vehicular crossings, kerb and guttering and drainage works), must be carried out in accordance with Council's "Crossings and Entrances – Contributions Policy” and “Residents’ Requests for Special Verge Crossings Policy” and the following requirements:
a) Details of the proposed civil works to be carried out on Council land must be submitted to Council in a Civil Works Application Form. Council will respond, typically within 4 weeks, with a letter of approval outlining conditions for working on Council land, associated fees and workmanship bonds. Council will also provide details of the approved works including specifications and construction details.
b) Works on Council land, must not commence until the written letter of approval has been obtained from Council and heavy construction works within the property are complete. The work must be carried out in accordance with the conditions of development consent, Council’s conditions for working on Council land, design details and payment of the fees and bonds outlined in the letter of approval.
c) The civil works must be completed in accordance with the above, prior to the issuing of an occupation certificate for the development, or as otherwise approved by Council in writing.
Landscaping
33. Prior to any Occupation Certificate, certification from a qualified professional in the landscape/horticultural industry must be submitted to, and be approved by, the PCA, confirming the date that the completed landscaping was inspected, and that it has been installed substantially in accordance with the Landscape Plans by Taylor Brammer Landscape Architects Pty Ltd as referenced in Condition 1.
34. Suitable strategies shall be implemented to ensure that the landscaping is maintained in a healthy and vigorous state until maturity, for the life of the development.
Site Arborist Certification
35. Prior to any Occupation Certificate, the Project Arborist must submit to, and have approved by, the Certifying Authority/PCA, written certification which confirms compliance with the conditions of consent and TMP in the Arborists Report; the dates of attendance and works performed/supervised relating to retention of the Spotted Gum.
36. That part of the nature-strip upon Council's footway which is damaged during the course of the works shall be re-graded and re-turfed with Kikuyu Turf rolls, including turf underlay, wholly at the applicant’s cost, to Council’s satisfaction, prior to any Occupation Certificate.
OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS
The following operational conditions must be complied with at all times, throughout the use and operation of the development.
These conditions have been applied to satisfy the relevant requirements of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979, Environmental Planning & Assessment Regulation 2000, Council’s development consent and to maintain reasonable levels of public health and environmental amenity.
Environmental Amenity
37. External lighting to the premises must be designed and located so as to minimise light-spill beyond the property boundary or cause a public nuisance.
Plant & Equipment
38. Noise from the operation of all plant and equipment upon the premises shall not give rise to an ‘offensive noise’ as defined in the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 and Regulations.
In this regard, the operation of the plant and equipment shall not give rise to an LAeq, 15 min sound pressure level at any affected premises that exceeds the background LA90, 15 min noise level, measured in the absence of the noise source/s under consideration by more than 5dB(A) in accordance with relevant NSW Office of Environment & Heritage (EPA) Noise Control Guidelines.
Swimming/Spa Pools
39. The pool plant and equipment shall not be operated during the following hours if the noise emitted can be heard within a habitable room in any other residential premises, or, as otherwise specified in relevant Noise Control Regulations:
· before 8.00am or after 8.00pm on any Sunday or public holiday; or
· before 7.00am or after 8.00pm on any other day.
GENERAL ADVISORY NOTES
The following information is provided for your assistance to ensure compliance with the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979, Environmental Planning & Assessment Regulation 2000, or other relevant legislation and requirements. This information does not form part of the conditions of development consent pursuant to Section 4.17 of the Act.
A1 The requirements and provisions of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979 and Environmental Planning & Assessment Regulation 2000, must be fully complied with at all times.
Failure to comply with these requirements is an offence, which renders the responsible person liable to a maximum penalty of $1.1 million. Alternatively, Council may issue a penalty infringement notice (for up to $6,000) for each offence. Council may also issue notices and orders to demolish unauthorised or non-complying building work, or to comply with the requirements of Council’s development consent.
A2 In accordance with the requirements of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979, building works, including associated demolition and excavation works (as applicable) must not be commenced until:
§ A Construction Certificate has been obtained from an Accredited Certifier or Council,
§ An Accredited Certifier or Council has been appointed as the Principal Certifying Authority for the development,
§ Council and the Principal Certifying Authority have been given at least 2 days notice (in writing) prior to commencing any works.
A3 Council can issue your Construction Certificate and be your Principal Certifying Authority for the development, to undertake inspections and ensure compliance with the development consent and relevant building regulations. For further details contact Council on 9093 6944.
A4 This determination does not include an assessment of the proposed works under the Building Code of Australia (BCA), Disability (Access to Premises – Buildings) Standards 2010 and other relevant Standards. All new building work (including alterations and additions) must comply with the BCA and relevant Standards. You are advised to liaise with your architect, engineer and building consultant prior to lodgement of your construction certificate.
A5 Any proposed amendments to the design and construction of the building may require a new development application or a section 4.55 amendment to the existing consent to be obtained from Council, before carrying out such works
A6 A Local Approval application must be submitted to and be approved by Council prior to commencing any of the following activities on a footpath, road, nature strip or in any public place:-
§ Install or erect any site fencing, hoardings or site structures
§ Operate a crane or hoist goods or materials over a footpath or road
§ Placement of a waste skip or any other container or article.
For further information please contact Council on 9093 6971.
A7 Specific details of the location of the building/s should be provided in the Construction Certificate to demonstrate that the proposed building work will not encroach onto the adjoining properties, Council’s road reserve or any public place.
A8 This consent does not authorise any trespass or encroachment upon any adjoining or supported land or building whether private or public. Where any underpinning, shoring, soil anchoring (temporary or permanent) or the like is proposed to be carried out upon any adjoining or supported land, the land owner or principal contractor must obtain:
§ the consent of the owners of such adjoining or supported land to trespass or encroach, or
§ an access order under the Access to Neighbouring Land Act 2000, or
§ an easement under section 88K of the Conveyancing Act 1919, or
§ an easement under section 40 of the Land & Environment Court Act 1979, as appropriate.
Section 177 of the Conveyancing Act 1919 creates a statutory duty of care in relation to support of land. Accordingly, a person has a duty of care not to do anything on or in relation to land being developed (the supporting land) that removes the support provided by the supporting land to any other adjoining land (the supported land).
A9 External paths and ground surfaces are to be constructed at appropriate levels and be graded and drained away from the building and adjoining premises, so as not to result in the entry of water into the building, or cause a nuisance or damage to any adjoining land.
Finished ground levels external to the building are to be consistent with the development consent and are not to be raised, other than for the provision of approved paving or the like on the ground.
A10 The necessary development consent and a construction certificate or a complying development certificate (as applicable) must be obtained for any proposed cooling towers and external plant and equipment, if not included in this consent.
A11 There are to be no emissions or discharges from the premises, which will give rise to an environmental or public nuisance or result in an offence under the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 and Regulations.
A12 Council’s assessment of this application does not include an assessment of compliance with the Swimming Pool Act 1992. All pool barriers, fences and structures within properties containing a swimming pool must comply with the requirements of the Swimming Pool Act 1992, BCA and relevant Australian Standards.
Details of compliance with the Swimming Pool Act 1992, Building Code of Australia and relevant Standards must be included in the Construction Certificate to the satisfaction of the Certifying Authority.
A13 Underground assets (e.g. pipes, cables etc.) may exist in the area that is subject to your application. In the interests of health and safety and in order to protect damage to third party assets please contact Dial before you dig at www.1100.com.au or telephone on 1100 before excavating or erecting structures (This is the law in NSW). If alterations are required to the configuration, size, form or design of the development upon contacting the Dial before You Dig service, an amendment to the development consent (or a new development application) may be necessary. Individuals owe asset owners a duty of care that must be observed when working in the vicinity of plant or assets. It is the individual’s responsibility to anticipate and request the nominal location of plant or assets on the relevant property via contacting the Dial before you dig service in advance of any construction or planning activities.
A14 The applicant is to advise Council in writing and/or photographs of any signs of existing damage to the Council roadway, footway, or verge prior to the commencement of any building/demolition works.
A15 Further information and details on Council's requirements for trees on development sites can be obtained from the recently adopted Tree Technical Manual, which can be downloaded from Council’s website at the following link, http://www.randwick.nsw.gov.au - Looking after our environment – Trees – Tree Management Technical Manual; which aims to achieve consistency of approach and compliance with appropriate standards and best practice guidelines.